PDA

View Full Version : 7 Most Dangerous Places on Earth



Atlantic Islander
09-05-2013, 08:22 PM
http://imageshack.us/a/img834/1/f8l7.jpg

Intro

From its churning, sometimes stormy atmosphere to its shifting tectonic plates, Earth can be a dangerous place. Earthquakes, floods and other natural disasters killed more than 780,000 people between 2009 and 2009, according to the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat. Millions more were injured or displaced. No one knows how the next decade will shape out, but some areas have more reason to worry than others.

http://imageshack.us/a/img571/3363/14ll.jpg

#7 - Lake Nyos, Cameroon

A silent killer lurks beneath the surface of this West African lake. A pocket of magma deep below the lake bed leaks carbon dioxide into the lake above. Under the pressure of 650 feet (200 meters) of water, this carbon dioxide stays dissolved, much like the carbonation in a bottle of soda.

But on the night of August 21, 1986, the water in the lake abruptly turned over, and the now-depressurized carbon dioxide exploded upward like a shaken soft drink. The resulting carbon dioxide cloud rushed downhill, asphyxiating 1,700 people and thousands more animals. In the 15 miles (24 kilometers) of valleys below the lake, almost nothing survived.

Today, pipes are used to siphon carbon dioxide-rich water from the bottom of Lake Nyos. The pipes prevent carbon dioxide buildup, but that doesn't make Lake Nyos entirely safe, said George Kling, a University of Michigan geochemist who was on the team that originally investigated the 1986 disaster.

"We're keeping ahead of the game, but we're not drawing the gas down very quickly," Kling said. "That means that it still is a very dangerous lake."

http://imageshack.us/a/img43/3826/xyap.jpg

#6 - Naples, Italy

In 79 A.D., Mount Vesuvius blew its top, burying the ancient cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum. More than 50 subsequent eruptions and the eerie human-shaped cavities left behind in the volcano's ash haven't dissuaded people from populating the slopes of this volcano by the sea. The city of Naples lies at its base, and up to 650,000 people may live on its slopes, according to Guido Bertolaso, the head of Italy's civil protection agency. An impending eruption could force the evacuation of more than a million people.

Vesuvius isn't the only active volcano threatening this densely-populated area. The Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Italy is littered with volcanoes. The most worrisome, according to Bertolaso, is the resort island of Ischia. An eruption there would affect Naples and "could be worse than a hypothetical Vesuvius eruption," Bertolaso said.

http://imageshack.us/a/img35/2618/j4ep.jpg

#5 - Miami, Florida

No one can predict where a hurricane will hit next, but south Florida is always a reasonable bet. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates the southern tip of Florida can expect more than 60 hurricanes over a 100-year period. And in 2008, sustainability company SustainLane ranked Miami as the most risky city for natural disasters in the United States.

Hurricane destruction in Miami and the nearby Florida Keys is nothing new. In 1926, the Great Miami Hurricane destroyed or damaged every building in downtown Miami and killed at least 373 people, according to the Red Cross. Less than 10 years later, the Labor Day hurricane of 1935 killed 408 people in the Florida Keys. In 1960, Hurricane Donna roared through the Keys and South Florida, bringing with it 11 to 15-foot storm surges.

Perhaps the most famous hurricane to hit south Florida was 1992's Hurricane Andrew . Andrew blasted through Florida as a Category 4 storm with winds so high they broke measurement instruments. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Andrew killed 23 people in the United States. The destruction totaled more than $26.5 billion.

http://imageshack.us/a/img842/561/fmrn.jpg

#4 - The Sahel region of Africa

Drought often doesn't get as much attention as other natural disasters, but it can be a killer. According to the United Nations Environmental Programme, more than 100,000 people died because of drought in the Sahel region of Africa from 1972 to 1984. Another 750,000 were unable to grow their own crops and were completely dependent on food aid.

The arid Sahel region borders the Sahara Desert , stretching across northern Africa through Mauritania, Senegal, Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Chad, Sudan, Algeria, Ethiopia and Eritrea. According to the U.N., human exploitation of the area's limited water is causing desertification, raising the risk of future drought and famine.

http://imageshack.us/a/img827/719/cpd9.jpg

#3 - Guatemala

Central America gets hit by a triple threat of natural disasters: earthquakes, hurricanes and mudslides.

Along with the western coast of North and South America, Central America lies on the Ring of Fire, a seismically active loop that encircles the Pacific Ocean. Guatemala isn't the only country affected, but it's been hit hard: In 1976, a 7.5-magnitude earthquake killed 23,000 people, according to the USGS. Thanks to the country's mountainous terrain, landslides hampered transportation and rescue efforts.

The combination of topography and weather can be deadly as well. Heavy rains can saturate hillsides, leading to devastating mudslides. In 2005, the remnants of Hurricane Stan soaked Guatemala, El Salvador and southern Mexico, causing more than 900 mudslides. Entire villages were buried; one, Panabaj, was declared a cemetery after officials gave up hope of excavating the bodies of 300 missing villagers. The exact death toll is unknown, but some estimates suggest that up to 2,000 people lost their lives.

http://imageshack.us/a/img28/126/26z7.jpg

#2 - Java and Sumatra, Indonesia


These two Indonesia islands face perhaps more natural disaster hazards than anywhere else. Droughts, floods, earthquakes, landslides, volcanoes and tsunamis all threaten Indonesia, and Java and Sumatra have the highest risk, according to the Center for Hazards and Risk Research at Columbia University.

The most famous disaster to hit Indonesia is the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami , which killed an estimated 227,898 people after a 9.1-magnitude earthquake triggered the enormous wave. Indonesia was hardest hit among the affected Southeast Asian countries, with over 130,000 people confirmed dead.

But smaller disasters cause more regular suffering. Between 1907 and 2004 (before the tsunami), droughts killed 9,329 Indonesians, according to the Columbia University group. Volcanoes killed 17,945 people in the same time period, and earthquakes killed 21,856. One of the most famous eruptions in history, of the volcano Krakatoa, occurred in the Sunda Strait between the two islands. And as recently as this February, floods drove thousands of west Java residents from their homes, and a landslide in the village of Tenjolaya killed dozens.

http://imageshack.us/a/img17/9950/qgqb.jpg

#1 - Istanbul, Turkey

No one knows when the North Anatolian Fault will rupture, but one thing is certain: It will rupture. The resulting earthquake could be very bad news for the 12.8 million people in Istanbul.

For the past century, earthquakes on the North Anatolian Fault in northern Turkey have been creeping westward. The last big quake happened in 1999, when a 7.6-magnitude temblor devastated the city of Izmit . The official death toll was around 17,000, but a 2004 estimate by University of Brasilia researcher Vasile Marza put the number at 45,000.

The next time the ground shakes, scientists expect that it will be even further west, just south Istanbul. A January 2010 study in the journal Nature Geosciences found that tensions along the fault are building and could trigger multiple small-to-moderate quakes. Or the fault could go all at once. In March, USGS geophysicist Tom Parsons told Nature that the chances of Istanbul being hit by a magnitude 7 or greater quake in the next 25 years are between 30 and 60 percent.

source (http://www.livescience.com/30602-7-most-dangerous-places-earth-natural-disasters.html)

Shah-Jehan
09-05-2013, 09:20 PM
Didn't know Istanbul was the number one dangerous city:lol:

finly
12-17-2013, 05:59 AM
I wonder to know about the danger places around the world. These all are really dangerous places. A silent killer lake (NYOS), I think is most horrible place..

Carlito's Way
12-17-2013, 06:18 AM
i wonder where they would place California since we have the San Andres fault that may destroy California
everyone in California is aware of the future big earthquake that will hit our state anytime soon

Atlantic Islander
12-17-2013, 06:35 AM
i wonder where they would place California since we have the San Andres fault that may destroy California
everyone in California is aware of the future big earthquake that will hit our state anytime soon

Well that's a bit over-dramatic, the big quake they are predicting is for Southern California. It would hardly affect the valley or most of Northern California.

SardiniaAtlantis
12-17-2013, 06:36 AM
Well that's over-dramatic, the quake they are predicting is for Southern California.

By the way Naples is very dangerous but not only because of Vesuvius! Haha ;P

Caismeachd
12-17-2013, 06:57 AM
San Francisco only has about 800,000 people and they are all fruitcakes, degenerates etc so no one will miss them when the next earthquake comes.

Atlantic Islander
12-17-2013, 07:11 AM
San Francisco only has about 800,000 people and they are all fruitcakes, degenerates etc so no one will miss them when the next earthquake comes.

That's rude.

One of my great grandfathers was in San Fransisco on a work visa when the 1906 one hit.

The next big one is predicted for Southern California not San Fransisco:



The next "Big One"

A study in 2006 concluded that the San Andreas fault has reached a sufficient stress level for the next "big one", or a M ≥ 7.0, to occur.[9] It also concluded that the risk of a large earthquake may be increasing more rapidly than researchers had previously thought. The paper stated that, while the San Andreas Fault had experienced massive earthquakes in the central (1857) and northern (1906) segments, the southern section of the fault has not seen any similar rupture for at least 300 years.[9] Such an event would result in substantial damage to Palm Springs and other cities in San Bernardino, Riverside and Imperial counties in California, and Mexicali municipality in Baja California. It would be felt throughout much of Southern California, including densely populated areas of San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, Ensenada and Tijuana, Baja California, San Luis Rio Colorado in Sonora and Yuma, Arizona.[9] It concluded:

The information available suggests that the fault is ready for the next big earthquake but exactly when the triggering will happen and when the earthquake will occur we cannot tell [...] It could be tomorrow or it could be 10 years or more from now.[9]

As both the public and scientific community continue to speculate on the size of the next earthquake to strike California, predicting major earthquakes with sufficient precision to warrant taking increased precautions has long been sought but remains elusive.[10] Nonetheless, the 2008 Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF) has estimated that the probability of an M ≥ 6.7 earthquake within the next 30 years on the northern and southern segments of the San Andreas fault is somewhere between 21% and 59%.

KidMulat
12-17-2013, 07:15 AM
San Francisco only has about 800,000 people and they are all fruitcakes, degenerates etc so no one will miss them when the next earthquake comes.

We make more money than some nations and have the second highest educated population in the US along with some extremely relevant industries Tech being one of them.

Don't be mad because you can't be in a cutting edge city that you most likely could not even afford living in.

armenianbodyhair
12-17-2013, 07:26 AM
San Francisco only has about 800,000 people and they are all fruitcakes, degenerates etc so no one will miss them when the next earthquake comes.
You can be a real idiot sometimes.

Caismeachd
12-17-2013, 05:24 PM
We make more money than some nations and have the second highest educated population in the US along with some extremely relevant industries Tech being one of them.

Don't be mad because you can't be in a cutting edge city that you most likely could not even afford living in.

I lived in SF for 3 years and before that I lived in Mill Valley. I could afford living there just fine but what is the point in living there in the first place? It's a hipster city for kids who don't mind living in poverty like conditions even if they are making $50,000 a year or a city for retired old gay men who have already made their fortunes and goto the castro to lure young twinks.

San Francisco isn't on the cutting edge of anything. You are thinking of San Jose and down towards Los Gatos (Los Gatos and Mill Valley are both very nice areas in comparison to living in awful San Francisco). San Francisco is a dirty and corrupt city full of crackheads in the Tenderloin and Mission districts, and homeless people everywhere.

Caismeachd
12-17-2013, 05:26 PM
You can be a real idiot sometimes.

So says the "everybody poops" girl.

curupira
12-17-2013, 09:09 PM
When it comes to earthquakes this is the most dangerous region in the world, the 'Ring of Fire':


The Ring of Fire is an area where a large number of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions occur in the basin of the Pacific Ocean. In a 40,000 km (25,000 mi) horseshoe shape, it is associated with a nearly continuous series of oceanic trenches, volcanic arcs, and volcanic belts and/or plate movements.It has 452 volcanoes and is home to over 75% of the world's active and dormant volcanoes. It is sometimes called the circum-Pacific belt or the circum-Pacific seismic belt.

About 90% of the world's earthquakes and 81% of the world's largest earthquakes occur along the Ring of Fire.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_ring_of_fire

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Pacific_Ring_of_Fire.svg

armenianbodyhair
12-17-2013, 09:09 PM
So says the "everybody poops" girl.
At least I am not butthurt that your country exists and a don't make stupid generalizations about everyone in it. Everyone does shit, including you, and it stinks just as much as anyone's in SF, you'd do good to remember that.

Graham
12-17-2013, 09:15 PM
My view of San Francisco is that of South Parks (I know it's silly). So not very good. :P The one with the drugs and the smug cloud.

McCauley
12-17-2013, 09:19 PM
I lived in SF for 3 years and before that I lived in Mill Valley. I could afford living there just fine but what is the point in living there in the first place? It's a hipster city for kids who don't mind living in poverty like conditions even if they are making $50,000 a year or a city for retired old gay men who have already made their fortunes and goto the castro to lure young twinks.

San Francisco isn't on the cutting edge of anything. You are thinking of San Jose and down towards Los Gatos (Los Gatos and Mill Valley are both very nice areas in comparison to living in awful San Francisco). San Francisco is a dirty and corrupt city full of crackheads in the Tenderloin and Mission districts, and homeless people everywhere.


Give it up Robert, you're not making any friends this way man.

morski
12-17-2013, 10:11 PM
My view of San Francisco is that of South Parks (I know it's silly). So not very good. :P The one with the drugs and the smug cloud.

Ye, remember them being addicted to smelling their own farts.:laugh:

rhiannon
12-17-2013, 10:14 PM
San Francisco only has about 800,000 people and they are all fruitcakes, degenerates etc so no one will miss them when the next earthquake comes.Not cool. I have a lot of family history in the Bay Area :( Your continued assault on Americans is getting old. You once left another forum because you thought people there were mean-spirited.....but these posts of yours are becoming rather similar about Americans, don't you see the similarities?

You can be a very good poster otherwise.