Federal Reserve Exposed on Bill Maher

[Sol Invictus]

cGxmdIwgB2s

Richard Belzer on Real Time with Bill Maher exposing the Federal Reserve plot to destroy the country and their role in the assassination of JFK.

Thoughts?

[Creeping Death]

Richard Belzer on Real Time with Bill Maher exposing the Federal Reserve plot to destroy the country and their role in the assassination of JFK.

Thoughts?
Doesnt make sense why would they have JFK assassinated? Executive Order No. 11110 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_11110) which only repealed the Silver Purchase Act hardly a threat to the Fed.

[Sol Invictus]

Doesnt make sense why would they have JFK assassinated? Executive Order No. 11110 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_11110) which only repealed the Silver Purchase Act hardly a threat to the Fed.

Under this order, Kennedy issued US notes which were backed with silver in an attempt to phase out the fiat federal reserve notes. Google US Note and there should be pictures of them. Immediately after Kennedy's death, LBJ recalled all of the notes and destroyed them except for a bunch that are still around in collectors hands.

[Rudy]

JFK's opposition to the NWO may have been a factor in his assassination. I usually think of the three main players as Cord Meyer, Hoover, and LBJ. I have not read any firm evidence implicating bankers yet.

Kennedy was far more hopeful of its long-term success and disliked Meyer's ideas on world government. Meyer also objected to Kennedy's relationship with his new wife.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmeyerC.htm

[SwordoftheVistula]

JFK's opposition to the NWO may have been a factor in his assassination. I usually think of the three main players as Cord Meyer, Hoover, and LBJ.

If Hoover is involved, wouldn't it be Hoover's opposition to the NWO? JFK was an internationalist and a Catholic who wanted to open the borders to third world immigration, Hoover was an 'old school' WASP who was anti-communist and not a fan of the changes which took place in the 60s.

[Sol Invictus]

If Hoover is involved, wouldn't it be Hoover's opposition to the NWO? JFK was an internationalist and a Catholic who wanted to open the borders to third world immigration, Hoover was an 'old school' WASP who was anti-communist and not a fan of the changes which took place in the 60s.

Not if you look in the grander scheme of things. He might proclaim that he was against immigration, just like Obama was against the Iraqi war and gitmo, yet, where are they facts and statistics to prove it? We know time and time again that politicians say one thing and do exactly the opposite to get what they want at one particular point in time to suit whoever the perceived majority is. I'm not claiming he didn't shut down the borders and stopped immigration significantly, but I just don't see the statistical facts to back this up. Hoover was 'old school' alright. And he was also implicated in a number of criminal activities prior to the assassination of JFK, whom he actually despised. Being anti-communist doesn't matter really either. The cold war was nothing but a boost for the weapons industry and brought in lots of revenue as I understand it, as was vietnam, both of which Kennedy was opposed to. Another reason to have him killed. So that really doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things, because people are filling their pockets at the same time they are banging their anti-red drums.

[Sol Invictus]

And for the record, I think the Banks did organize the assassinations of not only JFK,
but the attempted assassination of President Andrew Jackson, and Abraham Lincoln.
All of them hated the Banks and the Fed. So bye bye to you.
Just a hunch, really. ;)

Ron Paul I'd be packin' some heat if I were you.

[SwordoftheVistula]

Well if they managed to bump off both JFK and Lincoln must be something good about them :thumb001:



Lincoln is actually a mixed bag, but JFK is a scumbag who planned the destruction of America by opening our borders to the third world invasion. Unfortunately, JFK's brother Ted managed to get it passed anyways.





as was vietnam, both of which Kennedy was opposed to.

No, he was the one who started the whole thing.

[Sol Invictus]

Kennedy's support for South Vietnam was through support of military arms and supplies and not direct confrontation of North Vietnam. LBJ was, and expanded on the war and even oversaw the False Flag attack on the PT boats that were blamed on the NVA in the Gulf of Tonkin. He used this as an excuse to use direct military intervention, which is something Kennedy was strictly opposed to. He wanted the Vietnemese to fight the war on their own.

[Rudy]

Hoover was an 'old school' WASP who was anti-communist and not a fan of the changes which took place in the 60s.
With no verification, I read that JFK had given military secrets to the Communist (Chinese?).

This would enrage the old school anti-Communist like Hoover and Meyer. They also did not like when he backed out on the Bay of Pigs invasion.

LBJ just had a personal dislike, and was the only one with banker connections.
One would have to do some "banker and LBJ" reading to rediscover the links.

[Sol Invictus]

This would enrage the old school anti-Communist like Hoover and Meyer. They also did not like when he backed out on the Bay of Pigs invasion.


I think they used their anti-Communist leanings as an excuse to expand on the cold war. I don't for a moment think that the sociological ethics of a country on a geopolitical scale really mattered one iota with these people. War is big business. And if you pound your drums hard enough and attack the enemies way of thinking enough to get the people behind the effort, particularily in the Christian denominations, then you can basically let slip the dogs of war and do whatever you want to fill your pockets. Even if it comes to threatening other nations and the entire world with nuclear holocaust.

[Thorum]

Thoughts? Hilarious...

[Rudy]

In his speech JFK called for public information, and government secrecy at the same time. He was worried about the spread of Communism, the Cold War, which was happening outside of the usual lines of conflict. It could be seen as a next generation war. He was worried about government secrets given freely by the newspapers. At the same time, the citizens need the appropriate information for elections.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed--and no republic can survive. JFK

Usual conspiracy quote, which I think only deals with Communism.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion. JFK
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Speeches/JFK/003POF03NewspaperPublishers04271961.htm

[Rudy]

LBJ’s Mistress Blows Whistle On JFK Assassination
http://hidhist.wordpress.com/assassination/jfk/lbjs-mistress-blows-whistle-on-jfk-assassination/

Story says LBJ was avoiding criminal proceedings.

"It was a political crime for political power," said Brown as she highlighted how people who were set to testify against Johnson for indictment proceedings, related to illegal kickbacks Johnson was receiving from agriculture programs before the assassination, were mysteriously set-up in homosexual scandals or found dead having allegedly shot themselves five times in the head.
"Had the assassination not happened the day that it did, Lyndon Johnson would have probably gone to prison - they would have gotten rid of him - he was so involved with some of this," said Brown.
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=15167


Story backing some sort of banker connection. I recently read that all Federal Reserve Notes collect 5% interest per year for as long as they are in circulation. They are a debt, not an asset.

A number of "Kennedy bills" were indeed issued - with the heading "United States Note", instead of "Federal Reserve Note" - but were quickly withdrawn after Kennedy's death. Records show that Kennedy issued $4,292,893,825 of true money. It was clear that Kennedy was out to eliminate the criminal Federal Reserve System. It is interesting to note that, only one day after Kennedy's assassination, all the United States notes which Kennedy had issued were called out of circulation.
He may have been viewed as not pro-war enough.

The day after Kennedy's funeral, on November 26, 1963, Lyndon Johnson signed national security resolution no. 273, which completely reversed Kennedy's plan for a withdrawal from Vietnam.
http://nstarzone.com/JFK.html

[SwordoftheVistula]

Story backing some sort of banker connection. I recently read that all Federal Reserve Notes collect 5% interest per year for as long as they are in circulation.

No, the way the federal reserve works is they loan money to banks, and then the banks reloan it at a higher rate of interest.

[Rudy]

.
All of our currency states "Federal Reserve Note" on it. This simply means that the private owners of the Federal Reserve Banks are charging 5% interest (according to the Act) on every dollar bill that is issued. This is 5% of the face value! So, if a dollar bill stays in circulation for 20 years, we pay back the dollar itself, plus a dollar in interest to the private banks. Paul A. Drockton
http://deadmanmusings.blogspot.com/2009/10/13-illuminati-bloodlines-and-federal.html

I cannot find where this is verified in the Federal Reserve Act, someone would have to email Drockton.

Paul A Drockton M.A. has a "perfect IQ"
(190+). He is known for accurately predicting

1. The stock market collapses.

2. Gold Hitting $1,000 an ounce
http://www.moneyteachers.org/gold.htm

[SwordoftheVistula]

Yeah, someone either just made it up entirely, or maybe somehow confused it with the US govt selling treasury bonds to the federal reserve. How would you even charge someone 5% interest on a paper bill anyways? It doesn't even make sense.

[Sol Invictus]

Yeah, someone either just made it up entirely, or maybe somehow confused it with the US govt selling treasury bonds to the federal reserve. How would you even charge someone 5% interest on a paper bill anyways? It doesn't even make sense.

How dare you for asking such questions.

[Birka]

Just before his assignation, Kennedy was going to pull out any and all of the troops in Vietnam. Of course, LBJ totally ignored that direction of his predecessor.

I think the connection of his death and ordering non Fed Ban secured notes is very valid. Probably the main reason. You don't fuck with the Rothschilds of the world.

[Rudy]

Further explanation for the interest on the dollars.

3. Every time the government spends a penny, it sells a note or bond to cover the obligation. These are known as Treasury Bills and Bonds. The treasury Bills themselves cost us the interest that is stated on the Note or Bonds. The hidden tax is on the underlying currency that supports the bond.
Drockton
http://deadmanmusings.blogspot.com/2009/10/13-illuminati-bloodlines-and-federal.html

[SwordoftheVistula]

Further explanation for the interest on the dollars.

http://deadmanmusings.blogspot.com/2009/10/13-illuminati-bloodlines-and-federal.html

Yes, that's called the 'national debt' and occurs any time the government budget runs on a deficit. It doesn't have anything to do with the currency type or federal reserve, unless the government just decides to make up the difference through purely printing money. The money issued by the federal reserve is not backed by treasury bonds, it's not actually backed by anything aside from the US government's power to enforce it, nor is the money issued or loaned by the federal reserve 'government spending' since the federal reserve essentially makes up its own money.

[Rudy]

It doesn't have anything to do with the currency type or federal reserve
I believe the US had sometimes run budget surpluses in the past, before the invention of the Federal Reserve. Although, there were two previous bank attempts. The bottom line is that debt is not necessary for money to be produced.

As Thomas Edison had said, if a government can produce a bond, it can produce a dollar. Debt is unnecessary.

The US government could save over $300 billion per year in interest. JFK had been able to print American notes. In the debt clock link, it says that "money creation" is close to two trillion, but it does not give enough information.

As an aside, many people do not realize that the Federal Reserve also invests in the stock market, and can influence to expand or contract the markets.

[SwordoftheVistula]

The main problem is with government spending. If they just printed money and didn't get spending under control, there would be massive inflation problems like Zimbabwe has today or Weimar Germany. If there was a gold or silver standard, the government would have to issue treasury bonds and pay interest on them any time there was a budget deficit.