9/11 Truckload of Explosives Found Under George Washington Bridge!!

[Birka]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTkYOhiefRs

Why have we not heard more about this story? Other articles I can find about this seem to point that Israelis were involved in this truck story. ?

[Sol Invictus]

Why have we not heard more about this story? Other articles I can find about this seem to point that Israelis were involved in this truck story. ?

It's called damage control. People would rather believe that their government was stupid/negligent than actually be involved in crimes on this scale. Oh well.. Whatever people want to believe..

[Rudy]

Other articles I can find about this seem to point that Israelis were involved in this truck story. ?


I was contacted by an individual who led me to this information about the art students living in WTC Tower 1 before 9/11. In fact, in May of 2000, they were living on the 91st floor where they were doing construction and sleeping in tents.
http://www.rense.com/general87/14_1.htm
It would be nice know what type of construction they were doing. There is an older link to spies on the bottom of the page.

Two links for people interested in this subject.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/spyring.html
http://100777.com/usa/israeli_spyring

[Sol Invictus]

I covered it in this thread named : "14 Suspects Linked To Mossad Doing Construction on WTC" (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9336) with video included.

You can bet this sort of breaking news will not make the light of day.

Meanwhile back at the State Supreme Court:

"80,000 New Yorkers' demands for 9/11 Truth are silenced."

Fuck them.

[Thorum]

Why have we not heard more about this story?

I remember this story as it happened live on TV on 9/11 and the days following. The reason we have not heard any more? Because it is was false. There were no explosives in a van stopped that day. The story was retracted by those that reported it.

"On CBS Tuesday (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/17/business/after-the-attacks-the-coverage-some-flawed-information-occasionally-creeps-in.html?sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all) night there was a report -- originated by its New York station, WCBS -- that a van filled with explosives had been found on the George Washington Bridge. Though men in a van were detained, the vehicle did not contain explosives. Still, CBS said the report was based on trusted sources and the station corrected it when it learned that the report was in dispute."

"Though no explosives (http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2001/09/15/2001-09-15_blunders_mar_scoops_in_the_r.html) were involved after all, Kramer noted in an update that the vehicle's occupants were detained."

[Thorum]

Oh well.. Whatever people want to believe..

Yes, like a supernatural being impregnated a woman 2000 years ago and gave birth to a guy who died and came back to life and vanished again into thin air and loves you and can heal you and make you live forever. Yes, people will believe anything...

[Sol Invictus]

I remember this story as it happened live on TV on 9/11 and the days following. The reason we have not heard any more? Because it is was false. There were no explosives in a van stopped that day. The story was retracted by those that reported it.

"On CBS Tuesday (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/17/business/after-the-attacks-the-coverage-some-flawed-information-occasionally-creeps-in.html?sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all) night there was a report -- originated by its New York station, WCBS -- that a van filled with explosives had been found on the George Washington Bridge. Though men in a van were detained, the vehicle did not contain explosives. Still, CBS said the report was based on trusted sources and the station corrected it when it learned that the report was in dispute."

" Though no explosives (http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2001/09/15/2001-09-15_blunders_mar_scoops_in_the_r.html) were involved after all, Kramer noted in an update that the vehicle's occupants were detained."

Thank you for pointing out these mainstream news articles, they are indeed helpful.

[Sol Invictus]

Yes, like a supernatural being impregnated a woman 2000 years ago and gave birth to a guy who died and came back to life and vanished again into thin air and loves you and can heal you and make you live forever. Yes, people will believe anything...

I believe it. And you can choose to believe it or not yourself. I quite frankly couldn't care less. I'm too busy working on my own salvation than to be worried about anyone elses'. But, as you are implying - and I apologize if I am wrong - but I most certainly do not believe in everything or anything, and I hope you don't either.

[Thorum]

Thank you for pointing out these mainstream news articles, they are indeed helpful.

Quite right considering the original story came from the "mainstream" news...

[Thorum]

"80,000 New Yorkers' demands for 9/11 Truth are silenced."

Actually there were less than 25,000 signatures when the petition was filed. Ironic, that "Truth" is used in your title when it is false. (See attached).

[Sol Invictus]

Actually there were less than 25,000 signatures when the petition was filed. Ironic, that "Truth" is used in your title when it is false. (See attached).

Justice Lehner's order was a typo (meant to say 26,003) and is also only
referring to the number of signatures initially validated by the City
Clerk.

The City did concede that over 30,000 valid signatures were
contained in NYC CAN's first submission of 52,000 signatures, and
presumptively validated the 28,000 signatures contained in NYC CAN's second
submission when it decided not to count and validate them.

In total 80,000 signatures were collected and submitted, and an excess of 45,000 were validated. Under New York Municipal Home Rule Law this would have been enough signatures to put the referendum on the ballot had the Court deemed the petition legally valid.

http://www.nyccan.org

Have a nice day.