View Full Version : This map is correct ?
Anonymous211
09-12-2013, 12:56 PM
The history and geography of human genes Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza map genetic
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/The_history_and_geography_of_human_genes_Luigi_Luc a_Cavalli-Sforza_map_genetic.png
This is a reproduction of the map made by Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza in his book The History and Geography of Human Genes (1994). It displays the genetic relationship between human populations. Description from page 136 (unabridged edition): "The color map of the world shows very distinctly the differences that we know exist among the continents: Africans (yellow), Caucasoids (green), Mongoloids, including American Indians (purple), and Australian Aborigines (red). The map does not show well the strong Caucasoid component in Northern Africa, but it does show the unity of the other Caucasoids from Europe, and in West, South, and much of Central Asia."
Fire Haired
09-13-2013, 02:37 AM
The history and geography of human genes Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza map genetic
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/The_history_and_geography_of_human_genes_Luigi_Luc a_Cavalli-Sforza_map_genetic.png
This is a reproduction of the map made by Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza in his book The History and Geography of Human Genes (1994). It displays the genetic relationship between human populations. Description from page 136 (unabridged edition): "The color map of the world shows very distinctly the differences that we know exist among the continents: Africans (yellow), Caucasoids (green), Mongoloids, including American Indians (purple), and Australian Aborigines (red). The map does not show well the strong Caucasoid component in Northern Africa, but it does show the unity of the other Caucasoids from Europe, and in West, South, and much of Central Asia."
What type of genetics is she using because this is way off.
Look at what real experts with aust dna say click here (http://dodecad.blogspot.com/). There are three human families Caucasin, Sub Sahran african, and Mongliod Oceania. Oceania is Austrlia or really any of the black looking people in southeast Asia. Unlike what people said before DNA testing they are not anymore related to sub sharen africans than chinese are. They are actulley very very related to Chinese as shocking as that is. Y DNa and mtDNA haplogroups tell the smae story.
Unlike what national geographic says Mongliods ancestors migrated with Oceania ancestors. and they were not the first to leave africa they were the first to leave the mid east and north africa. Humans most likely left Africa and made big settlements in the mid east well over 100,000ybp. I get sick of the BS so many people have said about human migrations. Caucasians stayed in the mid east and eventulley starting about 50,000-60,000ybp went to Europe and north Africa. i am going to make a thread soon about this to cover up all the total garbage national geographic says.
ButlerKing
09-13-2013, 02:39 AM
Why is Burma and Malaystian colored in blue when their Asian Mongoloids too?
Hadouken
09-13-2013, 03:08 AM
what does the blue color mean ?
Smeagol
09-13-2013, 03:10 AM
I don't think it's very accurate.
Maleficent
09-13-2013, 09:19 AM
This version of the same map looks much more accurate even though it's kinda blurry:
http://kenanmalik.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/cavalli_sforza_covermap_of_races.jpg
It's actually one of my favorite anthropological race maps.
Anonymous211
09-13-2013, 09:23 AM
This version of the same map looks much more accurate even though it's kinda blurry:
http://kenanmalik.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/cavalli_sforza_covermap_of_races.jpg
It's actually one of my favorite anthropological race maps.
Why North Africa is Yellow ?
Maleficent
09-13-2013, 09:28 AM
Why North Africa is Yellow ?
You're right. These versions are even better:
http://press.princeton.edu/images/k4593.gif
http://z3.ifrm.com/67/29/0/a70582/avatar-70582.png
Peikko
09-13-2013, 09:29 AM
Non-whites approve.
Gaston
09-21-2013, 01:11 PM
Very outdated! In genetics, one year is already a lot, let alone 15 or so.
Libertas
09-21-2013, 01:18 PM
What type of genetics is she using because this is way off.
Look at what real experts with aust dna say click here (http://dodecad.blogspot.com/). There are three human families Caucasin, Sub Sahran african, and Mongliod Oceania. Oceania is Austrlia or really any of the black looking people in southeast Asia. Unlike what people said before DNA testing they are not anymore related to sub sharen africans than chinese are. They are actulley very very related to Chinese as shocking as that is. Y DNa and mtDNA haplogroups tell the smae story.
Unlike what national geographic says Mongliods ancestors migrated with Oceania ancestors. and they were not the first to leave africa they were the first to leave the mid east and north africa. Humans most likely left Africa and made big settlements in the mid east well over 100,000ybp. I get sick of the BS so many people have said about human migrations. Caucasians stayed in the mid east and eventulley starting about 50,000-60,000ybp went to Europe and north Africa. i am going to make a thread soon about this to cover up all the total garbage national geographic says.
It's a HE!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.