PDA

View Full Version : The Zionist Elephant In The Room



Sol Invictus
10-20-2009, 08:38 PM
Saw this featured on Militia Radio:

by David Icke
June 14th, 2009

Hello all …
The political creed of Zionism has big ears and a long trunk and I think it’s time that was pointed out. It also stampedes through our lives at every level and that needs to be said, too.

It has created a pincer-movement on the human mind by hijacking staggering amounts of political, corporate, banking and media power on one side and by using the fear of being called ‘anti-Semitic’ if you dare to state the bloody obvious.

They have been able to do this by equating in public perception that Zionism = Jewish people. It does not. Zionism is a political creed introduced by the House of Rothschild to advance the goals of the Illuminati families that are largely controlled by the Rothschilds.

When people think of Zionism they think of Jewish people. When they think of Israel they think of Jewish people. That’s understandable given the propaganda, but it is seriously misleading and those instant connections need to be broken if we are going to understand what’s going on here.

Zionism means Rothschild just as Israel means Rothschild. When we see the extraordinary number of Zionists in key positions around the world we are looking not at ‘manipulating Jews’, but manipulating Zionists representing the interests and demands of the Rothschilds.

Significant numbers of Jewish people are not Zionists and oppose that appalling creed while many Zionists are not Jewish. These include the Christian Zionists and Obama’s vice-president, Joe Biden, who told Israeli television ‘I’m a Zionist’. Here’s the clip if you can stand it … If, as Biden rightly says, you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, how can it be a racial rather than a political movement? It can’t. It’s just made to appear like that to manipulate public perception because opposing Zionism then becomes opposing Jewish people as a whole and the ‘you’re a racist’ card can be played over and over.

Far from protecting and advancing the interests of the mass of Jewish people it has often been devastating for them and caused millions to be labelled unfairly by the actions of the Zionist elite. On the Jews Against Zionism website one feature highlights how Rothschild Zionism targeted Jews who had lived for generations in Palestine side-by-side with Arabs in peace and harmony:

‘The religious Jews who by virtue of their faith, clearly contradicted Zionist nationalism, and who had lived peacefully with their Arab neighbors for generations, became unwillingly identified with the Zionist cause and their struggle with the Arabs.

They requested the United Nations that Jerusalem be designated as a defacto international city. They appealed to the diplomatic corps assigned to Jerusalem — but to no avail. They were hence confronted with the choice of either becoming a part of the Zionist State, which diametrically opposed the interests of Jews as a religion, or abandoning the land of which their forefathers were the first Jewish settlers.

Let’s get this straight. Zionism doesn’t give a damn about Jewish people. To the Rothschilds and their Zionist gofers and thugs the Jewish people as a whole are merely cattle to be used and abused as necessary – just like the rest of the human population.

The networks of the House of Rothschild were behind Hitler and the rise of the Nazi Party in the Rothschild heartland of Germany where they had changed their name from Bauer in 18th century Frankfurt and launched the dynasty that was to control global finance.

After the war the Rothschilds used public sympathy for Jewish people targeted by the Nazis to press for a homeland in Palestine. This was the alleged reason for the founding of Zionism, but that is only part of it.

As I show in my books, the campaign to impose a Rothschild fiefdom in Palestine goes back at least to the earlier part of the 19th century and probably long before. It was given a massive boost with the Balfour Declaration in 1917 when the British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour declared in a letter his government’s support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

This letter was sent by Balfour, an inner-circle member of an elite secret society called the Round Table, to Baron (Walter) Rothschild who funded the Round Table.

Today, Rothschild Illuminati fronts like the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Royal Institute of International Affairs, and others, still answer to the Round Table which string-pulls and coordinates from the shadows. This is why Zionists in government are invariably connected with these Rothschild-controlled organisations.

The Rothschilds funded the early settlers from Europe to relocate in post-war Palestine and they also funded and armed the terrorist groups, like Irgun, which bombed and terrorised Israel into existence in 1948, a campaign which forced 800,000 Palestinians to leave the land of their birth.

Israel is simply the State of Rothschild and how appropriate that they paid for the construction of the Israeli parliament building, the Knesset, and the Israel Supreme Court. The name Rothschild means Red-shield and it originates with the red shield ‘Star of David’ symbol (not a Jewish symbol before the Rothschilds) which they displayed on their house in Frankfurt …

The very flag of Israel tells you who owns it. There are many reasons why the Rothschilds and their allies wanted to hijack Palestine and one was to keep the Middle East in a state of disruption and turmoil from which a global war can eventually be triggered to usher in the New World Order of world government dictatorship.

The creation of Israel is a means not an end and the Rothschilds will be quite happy to leave the Jewish population to their fate if it suits them. After all, they’ve done it before.

The world’s second biggest Zionist population is in the United States and given that both America and Israel are controlled by the Rothschild networks it is not hard to fathom why that slither of land in the Middle East receives around a third of all US overseas aid.

An average $3 billion a year is handed to the State of Rothschild as a result of decisions made by American administrations that are always, ‘Republican’ or ‘Democrat’, controlled by the Rothschilds. One hand of the network hands over the cash to another.

This explains why the United States never talks about the arsenal of nuclear weapons stockpiled by one of the world’s most trigger-happy states. Israel refuses to discuss them and the American policy, recently reconfirmed by Obama, is never to ask or bring up the subject.

The last two US administrations are testament to the extent of Zionist (Rothschild) control of America and thus its foreign policy, not least with regard to Iraq, the former land of Sumer and Babylon, which according to some just happens to be part of the ‘Greater Israel’ that the Zionists seek to secure.

The ‘Bush’ government was the glove-puppet of the so-called neo-cons, or neoconservatives, whose only political philosophy in truth was the interests of Zionism. At the heart of the Rothschild-controlled neocon cabal were Richard Perle (Zionist), Paul Wolfowitz (Zionist), Dov Zakheim (Zionist), Douglas Feith (Zionist), John Bolton (Zionist), Lewis Libby (Zionist), the list goes on and on. These were the people who orchestrated the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq on behalf of the Rothschilds.

Economic policy was dictated through the years of Reagan-Bush, Father Bush, Clinton and most of Boy Bush by Alan Greenspan (Zionist), chairman of the privately-owned US ‘central bank’, the Federal Reserve. Privately owned, that is, by the Rothschilds through a network of front people and organisations.

Greenspan introduced the policies of deregulation that culminated, as designed, in the free-for-all frenzy of greed by banks and financial markets in general that led to the crash in the last weeks of the Bush presidency. Greenspan resigned from the Fed before the consequences of his long-term game-plan exploded in lost homes, jobs and savings. He was replaced by Bernard Bernanke (Zionist).

Greenspan was enthusiastically supported in his deregulation through successive administrations by Treasury Secretaries in the Clinton years, Robert E. Rubin (Zionist) and Larry Summers (Zionist), and also by the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the most powerful in the Fed cabal, Timothy Geithner (Zionist).

When Mr. Fake Change won the presidency amid the gathering financial crisis, caused by all of the above, and others, he appointed Geithner as his Treasury Secretary and Summers as head of the White House Economic Council. Both are protégés of Robert Rubin who resigned from Citigroup earlier this year for his role in ‘advising’ it to the brink of collapse.

Obama’s Budget Director is Peter Orszag (Zionist) who headed the company that advised the Icelandic Central Bank in the prelude to the crash of Iceland’s financial system. This has led to Iceland being fast-tracked into the Rothschild-created European Union to ’save’ its economy. Orszag also advised the Russian Treasury when state-owned assets and resources were handed to Zionist oligarchs, including Roman Abramovich who is famous in the UK as the owner of Chelsea Football Club.

Add to all this the fact that the World Bank is headed by Robert Zoellick (Zionist), who replaced Paul Wolfowitz (Zionist), and that the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, is run by Dominique Strauss-Kahn (Zionist).

Anyone still doubt that the Rothschild network controls global finance and therefore the lives and choices of virtually every man, woman and child on the planet?

The Rothschilds are at the heart of the Obama White House in the form of Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel (Zionist) and Chief White House Advisor David Axelrod (Zionist). Emanuel has served in the Israeli army and his father was an operative with the Rothschild terrorist group, Irgun, as it bombed Israel into being. This included the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in 1946 that killed 91 people.

Rahm Emanuel also worked closely Robert E. Rubin (Zionist) during the Clinton years to impose NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, which was designed from the start to be a stepping-stone to a North American, and eventually an American Union, along the lines of the EU. The Zionist world is very small indeed.

David Axelrod ran Obama’s election campaigns and now oversees his every word slavishly read from his teleprompter screens. There is little that Obama says that his Zionist handlers don’t tell him or give him to say.

They have also ensured that US policy for Iran and the Persian Gulf is headed by Dennis Ross (Zionist) who has served Israeli interests in successive American administrations. There will not be a cigarette paper behind the scenes between him and that trio of tyranny, Netanyahu, Lieberman, Barak, the prime minister, foreign minister and defence minister of Israel. Rothschild stooges, in other words.

Zionist Mandelson works for the pyramid

The most influential figure by far in the current British government is Peter Mandelson (Zionist) who continues to amass more titles and powers from the beleaguered Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Mandelson is an insider operative for the Rothschilds and has frequently accepted hospitality from his close friend and associate, Nathaniel Rothschild. This week Mandelson called for the UK to join the (Rothschild) single European currency.

Meanwhile, the hapless and hopeless Gordon Brown did as he was told and appointed Ivan Lewis (Zionist) to be minister of state with responsibility for, wait for it … British policy on the Middle East. Lewis, vice-chair of the Labour Friends of Israel, was an outspoken supporter of Israel’s slaughter of the innocent in Gaza this year. Lewis said of his new job:

‘My responsibility for the Middle East peace process is particularly poignant. I have never hidden my pride at being Jewish or my support for the State of Israel.’

What chance do the Palestinians have of fairness and justice? None.
In France, as I mentioned last week, President Sarkozy (Zionist) is a long-time asset of Mossad, the Rothschild enforcement agency masquerading as the intelligence agency of Israel. Mossad has been implicated in terror attacks and other horrors all over the world because it represents the Rothschild global agenda and not the people of Israel.

Look also at the Zionist (Rothschild) control of the entertainment and media industry in the form of people like Fox News President Peter Chernin (Zionist); Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Zionist); Walt Disney CEO Robert Igor (Zionist); Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (Zionist); Warner Brothers Chairman Barry Meyer (Zionist); CBS CEO Leslie Moonves (Zionist); MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Zionist); and NBC/Universal Studios CEO Jeff Zucker (Zionist).

The Rothschilds control America

The Los Angeles Times columnist Joel Stein (Zionist) wrote an article proclaiming that Americans who don’t think Jews (Zionists) control Hollywood are just plain ‘dumb’. Stein went on:

‘The Jews are so dominant. I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. But lo and behold, even one of that six, AMC President Charles Collier, turned out to be a Jew! … As a proud Jew, I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood.’

And not only Hollywood. Shahar Ilan, a daily features editor with the leading Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz, wrote: ‘The Jews do control the American media. This is very clear, and claiming otherwise is an insult to common knowledge’. Zionists have truly massive influence over the news media with the likes of Rupert Murdoch (Zionist) with his vast television and newspaper empire, and the Sulzberger family (Zionists) who own the New York Times. The list is enormous across television, radio, newspapers and the Internet.

When you look at the number of Zionists in key positions of power and control in politics, banking, corporations, news media, Hollywood and so on, it is sobering to think that Jewish people are just 1.7% of the American population and many of those won’t be Zionists.

What if the same situation happened with Arab people or Chinese, Irish or even black Americans? There would be an outcry and questions asked about how one group can have so much influence over the lives of a whole nation, indeed many nations. And I stress again that, in the end, this control system leads to the Rothschilds and the spider they represent at the centre of the web.

The Rothschilds established B’nai B’rith in 1843 to prevent exposure of the global Zionist networks. The ‘ BB’ is an offshoot of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and operates worldwide to brand as ‘anti-Semitic’ anyone who exposes the Rothschild operation.

In 1913, B’nai B’rith launched an organisation specifically to target and defame researchers, in fact anyone, who questions, criticises or exposes Israel and the ever-gathering Zionist influence across the world. With typical irony they called it the Anti-Defamation League, better known as the ADL, and claimed it was there to protect Jewish people.

As Plato said: ‘This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector’.
The ADL is, in fact, a sub-agency of the Israeli (Rothschild) centre for covert operations, the Mossad, which, according to a former agent, has the motto: ‘By way of deception, thou shalt do war’. If that isn’t the motto, it should be. The ADL is behind the introduction of ‘hate laws’ which are aimed at silencing dissent against Zionism or Israel. The Jewish academic, Noam Chomsky, said this of the ADL in his book, Necessary Illusions:

‘The ADL has virtually abandoned its earlier role as a civil rights organization, becoming “one of the main pillars” of Israeli propaganda in the U.S., as the Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on.
These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel’s refusal, with U.S. support, to move towards a general political settlement.’

The American rabbi, Michael Lerner, agrees:

‘The ADL lost most of it credibility in my eyes as a civil rights organization when it began to identify criticisms of Israel with anti-Semitism, still more when it failed to defend me when I was receiving threats to my life from right-wing Jewish groups because of my critique of Israeli policy toward Palestinians (it said that these were not threats that came from my being Jewish, so therefore they were not within their area of concern).’

Firstly, the ADL has never been a civil rights organisation. Its very purpose has been to take them away. Secondly, it is not there to defend anyone, Jewish or otherwise. It’s there to represent the sadistic interests of the House of Rothschild and the wider Illuminati.

It is so important that people are aware of this background to Zionism because at the moment it is basically speeding along unchallenged through lack of awareness and fear of being dubbed ‘racist’.

Well, I couldn’t care less what people say about me with regard to this or anything else. I want to uncover the truth, not win a popularity contest.
Please, let’s circulate this information as effectively as we can and bring it from the shadows to public attention. We must refuse to be intimidated into silence over this.

Martin Luther King said: ‘… we must straighten our backs and work for our freedom. A man can’t ride you unless your back is bent.’

It is time to stand up, in every sense.

SuuT
10-20-2009, 08:52 PM
When Victims Rule. A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence (http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/open.htm)

IMO - one cannot have a real discussion about European Preservation with out discussing Jews, more generally.

Perhaps the Apricity is old enough now...? :)

Sol Invictus
10-20-2009, 08:54 PM
European Preservation with out discussing Jews, more generally.


Indeed. No patriot, in any country, no matter what colour or creed you are can afford to ignore the elephant in the room. It's too bloody obvious.

Loki
10-20-2009, 08:59 PM
IMO - one cannot have a real discussion about European Preservation with out discussing Jews, more generally.


I don't agree with this assertion (i.e. that Jews are important for European preservation), but of course anything can be discussed on Apricity.

Perhaps what you're talking about is the Nutzi obsession with Jews? In any case it doesn't particularly interest me personally. But go right ahead, different things amuse different people. :wink



Perhaps the Apricity is old enough now...? :)

We can handle anything. And I mean anything.

Skandi
10-20-2009, 09:00 PM
Well go ahead and post a thread on it, but it really should stay in this section, for many different reasons.

Electronic God-Man
10-20-2009, 09:02 PM
We can handle anything. And I mean anything.

What about "Gaypricity"? ;)

Sol Invictus
10-20-2009, 09:03 PM
I don't agree with this assertion (i.e. that Jews are important for European preservation), but of course anything can be discussed on Apricity.

Perhaps what you're talking about is the Nutzi obsession with Jews? In any case it doesn't particularly interest me personally. But go right ahead, different things amuse different people. :wink



We can handle anything. And I mean anything.

I don't agree with the Aryan Nations creed that if you're a Jew than you're immediately part of a Blood Order therefore you must be a Zionist. Not all Jews are horrible people, and not all of them are control freaks. But there are those who hide behind their Jewness and use it as a shield to further their cause, which is a cause that is part of the problem that we as Colonials and Europeans face in everyday life.

SuuT
10-20-2009, 09:18 PM
...Perhaps what you're talking about is the Nutzi obsession with Jews? In any case it doesn't particularly interest me personally. But go right ahead, different things amuse different people.

I truly understand the desire to distance one's self from Stormfront-ish stuff, but that's a bit reactionary and a lot belittling, I'd say. Do you think me a Nutzi and that I am/might/would be amused by such things? :D Am I an irrational man because I think it pertinent?

I'm talking an intelligent discussion about the facts as they are, just as that which goes on here about Islam (some of the time).

I think that there is an objective and intelligent manner in which to discuss Jewish influence and how it (and it does) affect the European way of life.



We can handle anything. And I mean anything.

I think so, too. And I like to think I have contributed to the backbone of the forum, right along with your good self and many others. :)


Having a reflexive aversion to the topic is no good. The e-book I posted should be read by anyone interested in an objective gathering of facts so that people can take them under consideration.

Loki
10-20-2009, 09:22 PM
I think so, too. And I like to think I have contributed to the backbone of the forum, right along with your good self and many others. :)


Indeed, you have. :)



Having a reflexive aversion to the topic is no good. The e-book I posted should be read by anyone interested in an objective gathering of facts so that people can take them under consideration.

As I said, anything can be discussed. Some people will believe this particular conspiracy theory, whilst others won't. It's everyone's own choice. :) Go right ahead and post, friend. :)

Óttar
10-20-2009, 09:23 PM
If the Militia Movement wants to maintain credibility I suggest it stop associating with David Icke.

Sol Invictus
10-20-2009, 09:31 PM
If the Militia Movement wants to maintain credibility I suggest it stop associating with David Icke.

I've said it before and I'll say it again; with David Icke, he has alot of non-sense to say about reptilians and the like, but he also has alot of credible, and important things to say. I count this article among them.

SuuT
10-20-2009, 09:38 PM
... Some people will believe this particular conspiracy theory,

Which is...?;)


Say the word "Jew" and everyone jumps - but each in a seemingly different direction.

I am ever-mindful of the ambit of this forum. It is not mine: As far as I am concerned, I am a guest in the house of Loki and Foxie and I have fine and venerable hosts. If this topic is off limits in your home, do say so, if you would, for everyone's benefit.

RoyBatty
10-20-2009, 09:56 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again; with David Icke, he has alot of non-sense to say about reptilians and the like, but he also has alot of credible, and important things to say. I count this article among them.

That's my take on him as well. He's a strange mix of weirdness and incredible political insight. One can't take everything he says for "gospel truth" but then again, nobody is completely correct about everything.


From the article:



The Los Angeles Times columnist Joel Stein (Zionist) wrote an article proclaiming that Americans who don’t think Jews (Zionists) control Hollywood are just plain ‘dumb’. Stein went on:

‘The Jews are so dominant. I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. But lo and behold, even one of that six, AMC President Charles Collier, turned out to be a Jew! … As a proud Jew, I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood.’

And not only Hollywood. Shahar Ilan, a daily features editor with the leading Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz, wrote: ‘The Jews do control the American media. This is very clear, and claiming otherwise is an insult to common knowledge’. Zionists have truly massive influence over the news media with the likes of Rupert Murdoch (Zionist) with his vast television and newspaper empire, and the Sulzberger family (Zionists) who own the New York Times. The list is enormous across television, radio, newspapers and the Internet.


Yet when the goyim state these rather obvious facts they are of course being "haters", "extremists" and naturally, "anti-semitic", "Nazis" and "obsessed".

Funny that eh... :D

Loki
10-20-2009, 09:58 PM
Which is...?;)


I don't know, that is up to the theorists to properly formulate. ;)



Say the word "Jew" and everyone jumps - but each in a seemingly different direction.


I tend to be more on the indifferent side.



I am ever-mindful of the ambit of this forum. It is not mine: As far as I am concerned, I am a guest in the house of Loki and Foxie and I have fine and venerable hosts. If this topic is off limits in your home, do say so, if you would, for everyone's benefit.

Thank you SuuT, it is much appreciated. However I want to assure you that not many topics are off limits here ... you are most welcome to discuss. :)

Psychonaut
10-20-2009, 10:01 PM
IMO - one cannot have a real discussion about European Preservation with out discussing Jews, more generally.

So long as it can be kept within the realm of realism, I agree. Although, I've only encountered three authors who I felt treated the subject with the depth, clarity and truth it deserves:

Oswald Spengler's (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_spengler) The Decline of the West (I (http://www.scribd.com/doc/4654238/Decline-of-the-West-Volume-I-Form-and-Actuality-by-Oswald-Spengler-) and II (http://www.scribd.com/doc/4654389/Decline-of-the-West-Volume-II-Perspectives-of-World-by-Oswald-Spengler))
Francis Parker Yockey's (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Parker_Yockey) Imperium (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=451)
Dr. Kevin MacDonald's (http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/) books generally, especially The Culture of Critique (http://www.amazon.com/Culture-Critique-Evolutionary-Twentieth-Century-Intellectual/dp/0759672229/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256075698&sr=8-1)

Sol Invictus
10-20-2009, 10:12 PM
I tend to be more on the indifferent side.


Indifference is as much part of the problem as the problem itself.

A little video I made:

It turns out Huxley was more correct in his thesis than Orwell.
I dunno, you descide.

Eoru5FKp3oo

Loki
10-21-2009, 12:21 AM
Indifference is as much part of the problem as the problem itself.


In your view, which you are welcome to. Indifference regarding extraterrestrials is perhaps an even bigger problem. The REAL elephant in the house. Everybody think they are fictional. :coffee:

Sol Invictus
10-21-2009, 12:30 AM
In your view, which you are welcome to. Indifference regarding extraterrestrials is perhaps an even bigger problem. The REAL elephant in the house. Everybody think they are fictional. :coffee:

I'm not sure I understand..
So finding out whether aliens exist or not is the key to solving our woes?

Loki
10-21-2009, 12:46 AM
I'm not sure I understand..
So finding out whether aliens exist or not is the key to solving our woes?

Perhaps! :D Who knows ... after all, this is the conspiracy section. :coffee:

Wölfin
10-21-2009, 12:49 AM
I'm not sure I understand..
So finding out whether aliens exist or not is the key to solving our woes?

:thumb001: They could answer our questions and give us tips an tricks in our mission.

Ulf
10-21-2009, 04:50 AM
I KNEW IT. Jews are space lizards.

That said. Orwell and Huxley were both right. Just combine the two and there you have it.

Fortis in Arduis
10-21-2009, 06:31 AM
Israel is Rothschild bank dominated, but so is every other country on earth except Iran, Libya, Cuba and North Korea.

David Icke is correct in asserting that Zionism is not necessarily Jewish, however, Israel is the future of the Jewish people because Jews everywhere else are assimilating rapidly into very liberal multicultural societies.

In America, where Reformed Judaism is the norm, one need only have one paternal grandfather to be considered Jewish. Jewish conservatives refer to this as 'Deformed Judaism', and it is.

I have a different view to Icke and most of you.

Zionism is a perfectly legitimate expression of Jewish nationalism which has been hijacked by wicked politicians and materialists, the American military-industrial complex and the NWO.

I believe this to be the case because right from Israel's very inception there were underground Jewish political movements which sought to:

A. Prevent the Jewish Holocaust by warning European Jews that they should emigrate to Israel.

B. Oppose Marxism and internationalism.

C. Make Israel a free sovereign progressive nationalist nation.

What has tragically happened, is that:

Israel is a Stalinistic-Marxist, multicultural puppet of US-based capitalism and the NWO,

and,

Israel was the country, which, with a Marxist leadership, which in collusion with the British government of Winston Churchill, turned away victims fleeing Nazi persecution last century only for them to perish and for the story to be whitewashed in the Israeli, American and European education systems.

Funny how we never hear about this (http://jtf.org/israel/israel.treason.story.beyond.belief.htm) is it not?



For me, the problem is not Zionism but the diverse and nefarious political ideologues who have hijacked it and the obtuse individuals like David Duke, Lee Barnes of the BNP and David Icke who refuse to acknowledge the good within Zionism, siding even with Jewish leftists and traitors.

What a disgusting position for any nationalist or patriot to take!

Perhaps the Davids have issues because they 'bear the cross' of having the most Jewish 'Christian' names known to humanity.

SuuT
10-21-2009, 10:47 AM
So long as it can be kept within the realm of realism, I agree.

This is where many may part ways. Ergo, 'talking it out' can be of remarkable value.


My stance on what is 'real' about the situation of the Jew:

1.) There is no conspiracy: Ancient Jewish triabal affiliation stands as the bulwark of said group's collective conscience and consciousness.

2.) This tribal affiliation provides for the entirety of the Jewish weltanschauung.

3.) Within this weltanschauung are the means by which to discriminate entirely towards the end of 'Chosenism' in all realms of inquiry and interest on behalf of the Jew, at the behest of a religio-moral schema that - in itself - clearly and distinctly defines the term.

4.) For the reasons of 1-3, the Jew can be juxtaposed against virtually all other groups as they are an enigmatic phenomenon in the theatre that is the past, present and future of the memetic, genetic, and cultural milieu of mankind.