Privacy Error: Let This Be A Warning
I'm getting the dreaded "Your connection is not private" when trying to enter the Promethease website.
SCREENCAPTURE PROMETHEASE 2022-01-21:
https://i.ibb.co/t4y2ZYr/screencaptu...1-17-49-37.png
Quote:
Your connection is not private
Attackers might be trying to steal your information from promethease.com (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). Learn more
NET::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID
To get Chrome’s highest level of security, turn on enhanced protection
I detest paying directly online and only use PayPal. This way I can also directly cancel unneeded, unwanted subscriptions! GEDmatch also does not accept PayPal so I'm reluctant to upgrade my membership and join Tier 1.
Let's see what can happen if you decide to pay directly online instead of using a PayPal account:
https://www.productreview.com.au/rev...b-de5f0ee025fe
https://www.productreview.com.au/rev...e-776f23e2b3fa
https://www.productreview.com.au/rev...1-16bbb181d759
https://www.productreview.com.au/rev...4-da5af201969a
Jennifer T. Campbell, Mark Ciampa, Barbara Clemens, Technology for Success: Computer Concepts, 2019, page 2-10:
Quote:
Identify Secure and Insecure Websites Before you make a payment on a website or provide sensitive information such as a credit card number, make sure the website is secure. Otherwise, an unauthorized web user could intercept the payment or information and steal your funds or identity.
Quote:
Check if a site's connection is secure
To see whether a website is safe to visit, you can check for security info about the site. Chrome will alert you if you can’t visit the site safely or privately.
In Chrome, open a page.
To check a site's security, to the left of the web address, look at the security status:
Secure
Info or Not secure
Not secure or Dangerous
Not secure or Dangerous
We suggest you don't enter any private or personal information on this page. If possible, don't use the site.
Not secure: Proceed with caution. Something is severely wrong with the privacy of this site’s connection. Someone might be able to see the information you send or get through this site.
You might see a "Login not secure" or "Payment not secure" message.
Dangerous: Avoid this site. If you see a full-page red warning screen, the site has been flagged as unsafe by Safe Browsing. Using the site will likely put your private information at risk.
https://support.google.com/chrome/an...indicator&rd=1
Comparing Apples with....Apples
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VikLevaPatel
And if that wasn't bad enough, MDLP K11 shows a result of 63.03 for ASI and MDLP K14 shows a result of 29.55 for ASI!
The importance of an accurate result, one in which bias is removed as far as possible, cannot be over-emphasized. Two laboratories performing an analysis, for instance, may give significantly different results, indicating that one or the other, or both, may be biased.
So basically, what we see here are different calculators giving vastly different results, and that is precisely why they, the individual calculators, each considered singly by it self, are inconclusive and cannot have the final say. MDLP K11 is not available on Genoplot, but, in all fairness, none of them can be expected to give satisfactory results on their own. Perfect results or the best results are obtainable only when population categories are selected, and then followed by an across-the-board comparison of the selected category. (Comparing Apples with....Apples.) In other words, going through all of the Genoplot admixture calculators so as to arrive at an accurate conclusion (truth).
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VikLevaPatel
I stand corrected on this point. Genoplot is an excellent tool for making personal comparisons. That is, comparing your selected admixture results (such as your steppe admixture) with the findings from other genetic tests. In my particular case, Genoplot has been most useful for comparing results for the Euro Hunter-Gatherer, Western Hunter-Gatherer (WHG), Early European Farmer (EEF), Steppe Pastoralist (Yamnaya), and Sintashta populations with results particularly from FTDNA, Genomelink, GenePlaza, and Illustrative DNA (G25).
SO LONG AS you are comparing apples and apples and not apples against oranges.
GEDmatch on the other hand . . . :picard2::rolleyes2::shakefist:lmao:lmao:lmao:rotf l::rotfl::rotfl::1127::smilie_stop::smilie_stop::s milie_stop::machine gun::machine gun::machine gun::hitler::2headsalt::banghead::flynch::comp26:: cussing:dumbass::violin::fuckyou::puke::bullet puke
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...59#post7494159
I Nuked My Gedmatch Account From Orbit :thumb001::thumb001::thumb001:
Numbskulls would have you believe that I (and for that matter, my caste and my lineage) only carry a measly 1-3 percent Steppe ancestry, when, in actual fact, the opposite is true.
The evolutionary history of human populations in Europe: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1805/1805.01579.pdf
Sample report: https://i.ibb.co/MR3fCgM/screencapture-ass.png, https://assets.website-files.com/5cb...e%20Report.pdf
Early farmers from across Europe directly descended from Neolithic Aegeans: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1523951113
When the First Farmers Arrived in Europe, Inequality Evolved: https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ality-evolved/
Ancient European Samples Point to Steppe Herder Migration with Potential Language Implications: https://www.genomeweb.com/sequencing...ntial-language
Populating Europe. aDNA research shows that present-day Europeans are the result of a mixture of different ancient populations (blue diamonds): (1) West hunter-gatherers who had inhabited Europe since Paleolithic times; (2) Early European farmers, who descended from Near Eastern farmers and entered Europe during the Early Neolithic; and (3) Steppe herders, who arrived in Europe during the Bronze Age. The steppe herders themselves were a mixture of eastern Eurasian hunter-gatherers (Eastern hunter-gatherers) and Near Easterners. Additionally, Europeans have ~2 % archaic ancestry from mixture with Neanderthals that arose ~50,000–60,000 ya, probably somewhere in the Near East (purple star). There is also evidence that admixture with Neanderthals occurred again in Europe (purple triangle), as evident from the DNA of a 37,000–42,000-year-old human from Romania. However, this population appears not to have contributed detectably to later humans in Europe. Grey arrows represent the model for populating Europe inferred from modern DNA analysis. aDNA research refined this model by adding several additional layers of information, including multiple migrations and mixtures leading to present-day Europeans (black arrows)
From: Ancient DNA and the rewriting of human history: be sparing with Occam’s razor
https://media.springernature.com/ful...ML.gif?as=webp
1 Attachment(s)
Nuke Your Gedmatch Account
Gedmatch is now allowing a max upload size of five files before requiring the user to pay.
Have they heard that you can create Multiple Gmail Accounts :confused::picard2:
It's not like everyone is flocking to Gedmatch and just cant get enough of it!
"JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH OF GEDMATCH" Said No One Ever
GEDmatch has been the main database used by police for genealogy.
No Warrant Required for Public Third-Party Sites
An estimated 1.3 million users have uploaded their DNA data onto it, without knowing it would be accessible by law enforcement.
A DNA Firm That Caters to Police Just Bought a Genealogy Site
In 2018, GEDmatch played a key role in reopening the 40-year-old Golden State Killer case. Now a company that serves law enforcement is gobbling it up.
How a Tiny Website Became the Police's Go-To Genealogy Database
Upload DNA To The Police's Go-To Genealogy Database GEDmatch? Ain't Nobody Got Time for That
https://i.ibb.co/ckJfgzH/6fo085.jpg
Attachment 113910
Intellectual Property And Privacy
I will try to cover the great issues of intellectual property and privacy and will try to address these issues in my research and in my next few posts.
I have some great stuff and ideas or compositions coming up.
:notworth::clapping:thumbs:bounce::whoo::notworth: :clapping:thumbs:bounce::whoo:
There may be nothing new under the sun, but be sure to cite any passage or research data.