http://www.cnn.com/2025/11/13/scienc...na-documentary
I think this is a joke.
Well, I clicked on the link and got this:
This site can’t be reached
https’s server IP address could not be found.
Try:
Checking the connection
Checking the proxy, firewall, and DNS configuration
Running Connectivity Diagnostics
ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED
I read a long time ago that the Russians supposedly have Hitler's skull but they tested it and found it belongs to a woman, not a man.
small men are naturally drawn to repressive, authoritarian politics to compensate for their powerlessness in day to day life. When you're a hung giga chad, you don't worry about policing others' behavior or abstract notions like "nations" and "white purity" because your pride and self-esteem is internal and rooted in your own unique qualities and accomplishments.
"I'm a failed artist and a genetic dead-end, but I'm better than you because I share a race with great men who built empires and made masterpieces"
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/pai...-adolf-hitler/
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/wp-...Hitler-08.webp
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/wp-...Hitler-18.webp
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/wp-...Hitler-28.webp
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/wp-...Hitler-36.webp
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/wp-...Hitler-30.webp
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/wp-...Hitler-14.webp
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/pai...-adolf-hitler/
This is pure propaganda coming out of perfidious albion :
No genes for 'mental disorders' have been found. When you go into a mental hospital they give you no biological or genetic tests :Quote:
In addition to suggesting the possibility that Hitler had a hormone-disrupting congenital condition called Kallmann syndrome, the documentary examined rumors that the dictator had Jewish ancestry and looked at whether he had a genetic predisposition to certain mental health conditions. Called “Hitler’s DNA: Blueprint of a Dictator,” the documentary premieres Saturday on Channel 4 in the UK.
However, the findings shared in the documentary haven’t been reviewed by other scientists in the field or published in a scientific journal, making it hard for experts not involved in the project to evaluate the validity of its assertions. King said that the analysis had been submitted to a “high-profile” journal and said she hopes the work will be published soon.
Psychiatric insiders have openly admitted the lack of science to their area of operations. Allen Frances (cited in Whitaker and Cosgrove 2015: 61), for example, has recently stated that the mental disorders given in the DSM are “better understood as no more than currently convenient constructs or heuristics that allow [psychiatrists] to communicate with one another.” This has included the classic constructs of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (formerly manic-depression), of which the mental health researcher Joel Paris at the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, has admitted “[i]n reality, we do not know whether [such] conditions … are true diseases” (cited in Whitaker and Cosgrove 2015: 61). Even National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) director and strong advocate of biomedical psychiatry, Thomas Insel (cited in Masson 2015: xii), announced on the release of the DSM-5 in 2013 that the categories of mental disorder lacked validity and NIMH would no longer be using such diagnoses for research purposes.
Despite the claims to “progress” made by official historians of psychiatry such as Lieberman and Shorter, there is no evidence for the supposed “science” of psychiatry. There is no test for any mental illness, no proof of causation, no evidence of successful “treatment” that relates specifically to an individual disorder, and no accurate prediction of future cases. Thus, the claim that psychiatric constructs are real disease has not been proven. Consequently, it is necessary to utilise the existing evidence to more accurately theorise the real vocation of the psy-professions in capitalist society. As the faulty knowledge claims of the DSM are summarised by Burstow (2015: 78, emphasis original), “reliability cannot legitimately function as a validity claim and no studies have established validity”; therefore, “it follows that … no foundation of any sort exists for the DSM categories. This is a serious issue that calls into question the power vested in psychiatry.” It necessarily leads us to consider such institutions as moral and political enterprises rather than medical ones (Szasz 1974: xii) because psy-professionals make historically and culturally bound judgements on the “correct” and “appropriate” behaviour of society’s members. This is a point summated by Ingelby (1980: 55, emphasis added) when he states that
what one thinks psychiatrists are up to depends crucially on what one thinks their patients are up to; and the latter question cannot be answered without taking an essentially
political stand on what constitutes a “reasonable” response to a social situation.
In the same manner, British psychiatrist Joanna Moncrieff (2010: 371) agrees that a “psychiatric diagnosis can be understood as functioning as a political device, in the sense that it legitimates a particular social response to aberrant behaviour of various sorts, but protects that response from any democratic challenge.” Even Shorter (1997: viii) accepts that the profession is responsible for policing social deviance when he remarks that “[p]sychiatry is, to be sure, the ultimate rulemaker of acceptable behaviour through its ability to specify what counts as ‘crazy.’” Likewise, the concept of “health” within the mental health system is understood as whatever counts as “normal” within a specific historical epoch and cultural setting. Sayers (cited in Christian 1997: 33–34) states of this relative concept of “health” that
[t]he society and the individual’s role within it are assumed to be normal (that is to say, “healthy”: “normality” is a common synonym for “health” in psychiatry as in other areas of medicine). Indeed, the prevailing social environment is made the very criterion of normality, and the individual is judged ill insofar as he or she fails to “adjust” to it.
From the book Psychiatric Hegemony : A Marxist Theory of Mental Illness by Bruce M.Z. Cohen
How “Garbage-In-Garbage-Out” Academic Psychiatry Research Has Become Even More Ridiculous, and How Taking It Seriously Impoverishes Critical Thinkers By Bruce Levine, PhD :
https://www.madinamerica.com/2025/09...ical-thinkers/
Out of all the mental illnesses Schizophrenia is thought to be the most 'provable' :
Searching for the “Psychiatric Yeti”: Schizophrenia Is Not Genetic
After decades of study, billions of dollars spent, and thousands of studies conducted, the failure to identify any genes for schizophrenia should definitively put to rest the notion that schizophrenia is a genetic disorder, according to E. Fuller Torrey.
https://www.madinamerica.com/2024/01...renia-genetic/
Now they did not claim Hitler had a predisposition to a mental illness but a rare condition that affects puberty. This was not a finding of a team of international scientists and the plan to publish but it is well established that most published scientific research is false :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Mo...ings_Are_False
https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/...=655&h=783&m=6
Quote:
Groundbreaking DNA analysis of Adolf Hitler's blood has uncovered some extraordinary findings about the dictator's ancestry and possible health conditions.
Painstaking scientific testing by a team of international experts has been able to debunk a rumour on whether Hitler had Jewish ancestry (he didn't) and determine that he had a genetic disorder which affects the the development of sexual organs - all from an old blood-stained swatch of fabric.
While clickbait headlines have focused on whether the Nazi dictator had a micropenis and only one testicle, more serious are the findings that his DNA showed "very high" scores - in the top 1% - for a predisposition to autism, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Does this mean he had these neurological conditions? Absolutely not, say the experts - it's not a diagnosis.
Quote:
The bloodied swatch of fabric - now 80 years old - was cut out of the sofa in Hitler's underground bunker, where he killed himself when Allied forces descended on Berlin at the end of World War Two.
While inspecting the bunker, Colonel Roswell P Rosengren of the US army saw an opportunity to get a unique war trophy and he pocketed the fabric. It's now framed and on display at the Gettysburg Museum of History in the US.
The scientists are confident it really is Hitler's blood, because they were able to perfectly match the Y-chromosome with a DNA sample from a male relative that had been collected a decade prior.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/oth...ne/ar-AA1Qtl5Y
Pure propaganda :
I never understood people who criticized Hitler's artwork. It's genuinely very good. I'd like to see people critical of it do better.
This is not a political endorsement. Just about artwork.
What he painted, is this is the Cologne Cathedral? It is considered one of the most majestic and monumental buildings in Europe, and this painting does not evoke any feelings or desire to see the cathedral in person.
Edit: it is in cathedral from Vienna. OK, any way nothing special in this paintings, some technics without emotions and ideas
There are not many things more gay than making a thread about the size of a dead man's pp.
Still waiting for the G25
I read that Hitler had one ball because he had a condition that one ball was stuck inside
I had that too and had a ball surgery as seven years old i still have very small uneven balls one better visible then the other my penis is also very small
This micropenis bollox is based on the finding that Hitler had Kallmann syndrome, which can affect secondary sexual traits & leave the person in a state of incomplete puberty
Now, given that Hitler had quite a deep voice & strong facial hair growth, it is clear his secondary sexual traits were not affected
Yall going hard on defending shitler. And what facial hair growth? That little shitstain on his lips?
Hitler and the Nazis did study and admire certain U.S. racial laws, especially segregation, anti-miscegenation laws, and the 1924 immigration act. Hitler praised America’s “handling of racial questions” in Mein Kampf. However, the Nazis took these ideas much further and developed a far more violent and genocidal ideology.
Despite all that, Nazi Germany was a better place to be a black person than USA in 1930s and 1940s. Black people were banned from marrying Germans but they weren't lynched or killed like in the American South. Even Imperial Germany committed more crimes and genocides to Africans than Nazi Germany did. Nazi Germany probably would too, but Blacks weren't really important for it, as they were few and Germany already had no colonies.
Comment about this on another forum:
"There’s going to be a whole TV series about it. The first episode is already available.
https://www.channel4.com/programmes/...-of-a-dictatorQuote:
For the first time ever, experts identify Hitler’s DNA. What do his genes reveal about Hitler's heritage and origins, his neurology and drives?
Now, if Hitler’s DNA made him do it, can we look at why certain non-Whites seem to commit certain crimes over and over again?
I would reallly like to know if muh dick, skin colour, etc, has anything to do with bike theft, stabbings, robberies, low-IQ, etc. or if giant hooked beaks cause greed and parasitic and deeply immoral behaviour."
You are being way too generous. He has just enough technical skill in painting to not look overtly bad at art.
But... if you really look at his paintings youll notice that his perspective and field of depth is wonky and all over the place.
Because of this parts of his buildings are giant and other parts are tiny.
Some of them face the wrong way when they're supposed to be parallel.
Hes got some fundamentals he is lacking, but I guess its hard for laics to notice, because hes skilled in other areas of painting.
Perspective is one of the first things that any "good" artist has to learn.
His lack of care to have a single cohesive perspective makes his art kinda hard to look at.
https://i.imgur.com/5eD4HPb.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/H9TnlXn.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/751n43V.jpeg
I didnt read the thread but i did read an article about the subject yesterday. Apparently he had a genetic predisposition toward schizophrenia, bipolar, and... autism.
Further evidence for my argument that high functioning autists are the greatest threat to humanity.
Interesting post. Did you study art? I honestly have no ability to judge art as it's expressed. I think just as some people are 'tone deaf' some people are what I call 'spatially deaf.' Id say im spatially defective. I can't explain why a piece of art is a masterpiece other than what objects are supposed to symbolize in medieval art, etc.
I once saw a thread or an article about Hitler's beautiful artwork being rejected by the Jews in charge of the art school and the hideous distorted monstrosities by the untalented people who were accepted by the art school instead of Hitler.
If you had seen what I saw you'd be convinced of what I'm convinced.
Psychiatry is a pseudo-science when you are admitted to a psych-ward there are no biological or genetic tests given. It is all based on a checklist of subjective symptoms from a scientificically invalid and mathematically unreliable DSM-5. The increase in the autism diagnosis is at the behest of neoliberal capital. It is the pathologizition of shyness : it is no longer sufficient to just shift product in the marketplace one must now do it with a smile and a friendly touch :
https://www.madinamerica.com/2024/01...renia-genetic/
https://www.madinamerica.com/2025/09...ical-thinkers/
Like you pointed out before there were not any significant black people in Germany at that time though
Hitler was clearly a white supremacist and his black people were roma - the racial laws regarding purity were stricter for roma then for jews and roma had the black triangle tattooed on their bodies in concentration camps (black for colored/dark skinn/dark blood)
I think the nazis considered jews as white but not as aryan though but they were not as strict on their impure blood like on the roma
Roma are a black population
Not only africans are black
Roma dravidians australian aboriginals melanasians papuans and adamnese islanders are black too
If Hitler did that because of colored impure blood he would have done it to africans too
Did Hitler copy parts of his ideology from American white supremacy?
Yes — historically, Hitler and other Nazi ideologists did observe, study, and sometimes openly admire certain aspects of early-20th-century American racial policies.
This does not mean the U.S. government supported Nazism, but some American laws influenced Nazi thinking.
Here are the key historical points:
1. U.S. racial laws influenced Nazi racial policy
Historians such as James Q. Whitman (Hitler’s American Model, 2017) show that Nazi lawyers studied American laws when developing the Nuremberg Race Laws — especially:
Jim Crow segregation
Anti-miscegenation laws (laws banning interracial marriage in many U.S. states)
Racial immigration restrictions (especially the 1924 Johnson-Reed Immigration Act)
Native American reservation policies
The Nazis saw the U.S. as a real-world example of how a large modern country applied racial hierarchy in law.
2. Hitler praised aspects of American racism in Mein Kampf
Hitler wrote approvingly about:
The “conquest” of the American West and the treatment of Native Americans
America’s immigration restrictions, which he saw as a model for “racial purity”
In Mein Kampf, he called the United States a “Nordic” success story (in his racial fantasy) and admired how it “protected” what he saw as the dominance of Anglo-Saxon settlers.
He did not admire American democracy — he hated that — but he appreciated America’s racial segregation and immigration policy of the time.
3. Nazis studied U.S. eugenics
Before WWII, the U.S. had one of the world’s most active eugenics movements.
American states even had forced-sterilization laws for disabled people.
Nazi eugenics programs cited American precedents and sometimes said the U.S. was “ahead” in racial hygiene before Germany implemented its own much more extreme version.