I guess the NA would mainly be typed as ENF.
Printable View
I'm guessing the rest would either be shuffled into East African or some middle eastern cluster. What makes this calculator more reliable than any other one? If results aren't consistent then I don't see why I should trust something that's one off.
Me either. Usually all percentages are in the Zeros for West African, rarely East African, but whenever North or NorthWest_African appears, all of the other African categories are empty. This only brings me to one conclusion. It's North African.
ANE K7
ANE 11.68%
ASE 0.28%
WHG-UHG 48.64%
East_Eurasian 0.32%
West_African -
East_African 1.21%
ENF 37.87%
K36 African Percentages
Central_African -
East_African -
North_African 2.95%
Northeast_African -
Omotic -
Pygmy -
West_African -
K13 African Percentages
Northeast_African 0.61%
Sub-Saharan -
K15 African Percentages
Northeast_African 0.58%
Sub-Saharan -
Dodecad K12b African Percentage
Northwest_African 4.79%
East_African -
Sub_Saharan -
I find it odd that Northeast_African and East African don't appear in the K36 or K12b.
Some averages I took a week ago.
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...ps4425dd6d.jpg
Wow. I'm surprised at the E-African for the Anglo Saxons.
ANE 15.05%
ASE 1.62%
WHG-UHG 63.27%
West_African 0.78%
East_African 0.71%
ENF 18.58%
Updated results, due to my first run being wrong.
The results for a lot of people here are very odd indeed. I am quite taken aback.