bottom line there imputation process fucked up everything
thats why other tests results are fucking different ....
:picard2:
p.s
if ftdna doesn't use imputation process than there results are more reliable :thumb001:
Printable View
bottom line there imputation process fucked up everything
thats why other tests results are fucking different ....
:picard2:
p.s
if ftdna doesn't use imputation process than there results are more reliable :thumb001:
I get that the reference pop for Northern Italy is Tuscans, who are Central Italians, but seriously how can a Macedonian score over twice the Northern Italy of an actual Northern Italian..
https://s18.postimg.org/xbk6tpn6h/gencoveupd.png
litvin told me ftdna doesn't do imputation { guessing}
i don't know if you will like your results from them yes or no
but it will be still more reliable ....
share results when you have them :)
regards
adam
p.s
i am speaking about 23and me v5
23and me v3 and v4 was ok without imputation
from there site :
blue moon you were correct :(
We've used a method called imputation to fill in blanks in your genome, which means some blanks may be filled incorrectly. Please read this great article by DNA.land to learn more about it. This is one of the reasons data in your Gencove account should only be used for research or educational purposes.
:picard2:
Attachment 71681
Attachment 71682
Attachment 71683
Attachment 71684
Attachment 71685
Average of all of them(rounded)
North and Central Europe 91%
Northern British isles 5%
East Mediterranean 3%
Finland 1%
Given I'm nearly a 3rd Scottish the Northern British isles is surprisingly low. Indeed it appears to be lower than quite a few non British people.