Wrong. The croatians in Hungary have origins from Dalmatia & Bosnia, they are refugees from the constant warfare with Ottomans.
My Croatian ancestor had surname which exist only is specific area of southern Dalmatia, and nowhere else in Croatia.
Printable View
Your Croatian ancestor is not directly from Daolmatia than you thin that your Croatian ancestor have a far Dalmatian origin.
Your Croatian ancestor is probably from Bunjevci people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunjevci
Origin of Bunjevci is in Herzegovina, in the Middle Age in Herzegovina they were known as Catholic Vlachs, they migrated from Hezegovina in 16th century to Dalmatia and Lika and in 17th century they settled in Baranya, Bacska.
In southern Hungary Bunjevci live around Mohacs and Baja.
The villagers haven't mixed with anybody. When she married my Hungarian grand-grandfather, she was 100% Croatian, and spoke the croatian language.
As I said, before the 20th century, there was no mixing with Swabians, Croatians and Slovaks in Transdanubia. They mostly married their own ethnic group from village or neighbouring villages.
Now they are mixed. But it wasn't the case before.
1/2 Turkish, 1/4 Kyrgyz, 1/4 Kazakh results.
https://i.hizliresim.com/lbOOng.png
ya nenevizhu tebya
Attachment 69901
Anyone wanna take a guess at my origins?
'Murica.
https://i.imgur.com/9uyNGtX.png
balkan stronk
https://s33.postimg.org/epexng78f/dna.land.png
https://i.imgur.com/ag0ydsg.png
NOTE: They have included Bulgarians as "BALKAN", but Bulgarians are the same people like Romanians, Serbs, Bosnians. They are Slavic people, and Romanian spoke Slavonic languages before they adopted Romance.
So anther completely wrong Autosomal reference. Please share yours so I can see the difference (if there is any).
BALKANS
Includes: Albanian in Albania; Bulgarian in Bulgaria and Greek in (2 sites) Greece
Does not include: Egyptian in (2 sites) Egypt; Belarusian in Belarus; Italian/EastSicilian, Italian/Bergamo and Toscani in (Bergamo and 2 other sites) Italy; Lithuanian in Lithuania; Ashkenazi Jew in Poland; Turkish in (Aydin, Balikesir and Istanbul) Turkey; Ukrainian in (East) Ukraine and Ashkenazi Jew from East Europe especially Lithuania (expat in Baltimore MD)
North Slavic
NORTH SLAVIC
Includes: Belarusian in Belarus; Estonian in Estonia; Lithuanian in Lithuania; Mordovian and Russian in Russia and Ukrainian in (East) Ukraine
Does not include: Altaian, Kalmyk, Nganasan and Adygei in (Caucasus and 3 other sites) Russia; Turkmen in Uzbekistan; Albanian in Albania; Bulgarian in Bulgaria; Italian/Bergamo in (Bergamo) Italy; Norwegian in Norway; Ashkenazi Jew in Poland; Turkish in (Istanbul) Turkey; Finnish in Finland and Ashkenazi Jew from East Europe especially Lithuania (expat in Baltimore MD)
Amazonian
Damn, Amazonians in Bosnia? Anyway, cool score , extremely high Balkan.
100% Balkan.
Just because South Slavs are included doesnt mean Slavic genes are includes
98% Balkan
1.6% Northwest European
Што је у мене Балкан овако велик, нисам ја Шиптар :/
https://i.imgur.com/cvxkTAY.png
My grand grand grand grand grand mother was Wonder Women.
actually it's ambiguous 1 point something:
https://i.imgur.com/p0WWFO3.png
Deleted
Northwest Euro: 64%
Southwest Euro: 14%
Balkan: 6%
South/Central Euro: 5.2%
Finnish: 5%
North Slavic: 3.9%
Nganasan: 1.8%
i am all over the place from pakistan in the east to iberia in the west
acording to this dna land joke i preffer my origins 2.0 and my heritage
and above them kurd k29 the best :)
Attachment 71274
were is my east slavic of kurd k29 which is inline with with my heritage and my origins 2.0 and dna tribes snp report
i want those cossack genes https://fanparty.ru/fanclubs/aleksan..._domogarov.jpg ....:cry
cool results :thumb001:
the indo-iranian are aryan genes
maybe fractal was correct ;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika
Thanks yo.
lol yeah the indo-iranian is pretty cool. It reflects the baloch ancestry I think. I dont think i have aryan genes though, although i wish i had some. Many north indians get indus valley and all in huge percentages, which is a sign of aryan admixture. I lack that component since I'm south indian. Indus valley is huge in central asians and persians as well.
Also what did fractal say?
he just said that the swastika is aryan sign
and in the link about it is written that it was first found in 3000 bc indus valley civilization
so the indus valley component is probably aryan componet and not the indo iranian
maybe the indo- iranian were brought to india by the ancient persians
but i saw some results in russian language forum molgen and some bashkirs scored indo-iranian there this could also be Scythian stuff :)
regards
adam