Typical local Moldavian folk music, nothing Bulgarian.
Printable View
You can see their perspective here.
I personally don't have a problem with them being russophones in their autonomy. All the Gagauz people that I've ever known in Chisinau spoke decent Romanian. They are just not incentivised to use it in the autonomy, since their population is very homogeneous and Russian is native for them. Ironically they received autonomy, but instead of using its benefits to preserve their Turkic language, they started teaching mainly in Russian. The media is also mostly Russian. So they are now in a situation were Gagauz is a dying language, which is kept on life support by Turkish investments.
What about Poles? I think many dress well but mostly in bigger cities like Warsaw or Wrocław. Elsewhere ... you can even find what we call Faszyn from Raszyn, Raszyn is a village near Warsaw ... and many who don't care either. And it sounds like Russian in English too.
:D
https://d-pt.ppstatic.pl/k/r/1/8b/48...jpg?1529952485
I wouldn't mind them leaving Moldova for Russia altogether ;)
Better than any fucking Muslims.
But the point is they are genetically almost completely native to the region.
By the way, I think there were some questions in the PMs I sent you some days ago. About the Romanian language in Moldova.
That is bullshit commercial folklore with roots in Lautar music, peasant music is different, more simplistic and authentic. Especially in today Republic she is still very alive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkHcTPDNQPA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_JkRvvOcqc
There's no need to visit. Probably half of the working age Transnistrians are every day either in Chisinau or Odessa. There are long queues every morning and afternoon on the Dniester, since they commute to Chisinau for work. Chisinau is like 50km away from Tiraspol.
The conflict is mostly political, as people haven't really been separated.
I understand.
Real Latin speaking Moldavians without recent Russian/Ukrainian admixture are Romanian like people on average, not Bosniak, Bosnian Serb and Croatian like as Gedmatch average say. Make sense that Moldavian are closer to Romanians than to people who are located hundreds of km from them and speak different language.
Yes, but also there is overlap. My closest matches on G25 are Croatians, Bosnians, Slovenes and Hungarians. Same goes for my parents.
On K13, I get the following:
# Population Percent 1 Baltic 29.33 2 North_Atlantic 25.27 3 West_Med 15.21 4 East_Med 13.04 5 West_Asian 9.95 6 Siberian 2.85 7 East_Asian 1.83 8 Red_Sea 1.42 9 South_Asian 0.7 10 Oceanian 0.4
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance 1 Serbian 4.31 2 Moldavian 5.04 3 Romanian 7.02 4 Croatian 7.86 5 Hungarian 8.13 6 Bulgarian 9.24 7 Austrian 11.88 8 East_German 13.07 9 Ukrainian_Lviv 13.8 10 South_Polish 14.54 11 Ukrainian 15.09 12 West_German 17.6 13 Greek_Thessaly 17.77 14 Polish 18.25 15 Southwest_Russian 18.34 16 Ukrainian_Belgorod 18.59 17 South_Dutch 19.05 18 Tatar 19.21 19 French 19.66 20 North_Italian 20.22
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance 1 83.1% Serbian + 16.9% Tatar @ 1.87 2 88% Serbian + 12% Chuvash @ 1.97 3 90.1% Serbian + 9.9% Mari @ 2.25 4 79.3% Romanian + 20.7% East_Finnish @ 2.33 5 76.6% Romanian + 23.4% Kargopol_Russian @ 2.48 6 78.8% Romanian + 21.2% Finnish @ 2.58 7 55.7% Serbian + 44.3% Moldavian @ 2.65 8 87.2% Serbian + 12.8% Erzya @ 2.66 9 61.2% Ukrainian + 38.8% Italian_Abruzzo @ 2.71 10 73.3% Bulgarian + 26.7% Finnish @ 2.73 11 60.5% Moldavian + 39.5% Romanian @ 2.77 12 86.8% Serbian + 13.2% Kargopol_Russian @ 2.82 13 83.8% Moldavian + 16.2% Tuscan @ 2.83 14 67.8% Romanian + 32.2% Ukrainian_Lviv @ 2.83 15 84.9% Moldavian + 15.1% Italian_Abruzzo @ 2.86 16 69.8% Romanian + 30.2% Ukrainian @ 2.86 17 79.4% Romanian + 20.6% Estonian @ 2.88 18 74.2% Bulgarian + 25.8% East_Finnish @ 2.91 19 71.7% Bulgarian + 28.3% Southwest_Finnish @ 2.91 20 51.7% Tuscan + 48.3% Erzya @ 2.93
You speak Russian, right?
https://moldova.europalibera.org/a/28825691.html
I recommend this book on how they treat their own people.
new_Moldavian,23.90,28.82,16.52,10.09,14.90,1.80,0 .53,0.57,1.47,0.68,0.41,0.14,0.10
Still, I am closer to new_Moldavian than to Croatian. :thumb001:
https://i.imgur.com/Vbb5BwA.jpg
The people who are close to Romanian average are these from the south who live close to Bulgarians and Gagauz colonists, and people who have origins from that area, northern the situation is different, many in fact are very close to that average, some are even more northern (Mold/Ukro mixes). But since you are Serb, and you skip my response, not surprised me.
Unrelated to the topic.
I wonder what is amount of kaykavians in Croatian average on Gedmatch when Krajina Serb woman (Đurić, your match) who have 44.11% North_European on K12b stay little more southern on K15 map than official Croatian average https://i.imgur.com/4U5kt90.png
So colled Croatian average must be 45% NE according to this, and in my opinion that is too much for average for Croatians as whole.
On Poreklo Croatian average NE on K12b is 41.75%, and on Eupedia stay 42.6%.
New Moldavian and Serbian averages are basically overlapped.
new_Moldavian,23.90,28.82,16.52,10.09,14.90,1.80,0 .53,0.57,1.47,0.68,0.41,0.14,0.10
Serbian_new,25.1342857143,30.1357142857,16.5271428 571,8.7135714286,15.37,1.75,0.3692857143,0.2928571 429,0.8414285714,0.3471428571,0.3021428571,0.04357 14286,0.0978571429
https://i.imgur.com/Lvy8unD.jpg
This match of my mother is most likely Moldovan. It's unmixed East Romance speaker (Radu is his name), but with very weird and almost nonexistant surname.
It exists only on 3 locations in northern part of Romanian Moldova.
https://www.hartanumeromanesti.eu/en...hichi&s=Search
1 Baltic 31.36
2 North_Atlantic 22.58
3 East_Med 16.01
4 West_Med 14.37
5 West_Asian 10.9
6 Red_Sea 2.56
7 Siberian 1.23
8 Amerindian 0.53
9 Northeast_African 0.27
10 Oceanian 0.19
Single Population Sharing:
1 Serbian 5.73
2 Moldavian 5.78
3 Romanian 7.01
4 Bulgarian 8.19
5 Croatian 8.64
6 Hungarian 10.5
7 Ukrainian_Lviv 14.32
8 Austrian 14.82
9 South_Polish 15.39
10 Ukrainian 15.6
11 East_German 15.91
12 Greek_Thessaly 16.95
13 Southwest_Russian 17.98
14 Ukrainian_Belgorod 18.16
15 Polish 18.73
16 Russian_Smolensk 20.22
17 Tatar 20.59
18 Estonian_Polish 20.74
19 West_German 20.92
20 Belorussian 21.33
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
1 56.9% Southwest_Russian + 43.1% Central_Greek @ 1.08
2 61.1% Southwest_Russian + 38.9% South_Italian @ 1.35
3 60.8% Ukrainian_Belgorod + 39.2% South_Italian @ 1.45
4 69% Bulgarian + 31% Southwest_Russian @ 1.48
5 51.7% Greek_Thessaly + 48.3% Ukrainian_Belgorod @ 1.5
6 52.1% Central_Greek + 47.9% Lithuanian @ 1.5
7 56.6% Ukrainian_Belgorod + 43.4% Central_Greek @ 1.53
8 69.2% Bulgarian + 30.8% Ukrainian_Belgorod @ 1.54
9 54% Russian_Smolensk + 46% Central_Greek @ 1.6
10 70.9% Ukrainian + 29.1% Cyprian @ 1.68
11 58.1% Southwest_Russian + 41.9% East_Sicilian @ 1.7
12 71.2% South_Polish + 28.8% Cyprian @ 1.71
13 57.9% Ukrainian_Belgorod + 42.1% East_Sicilian @ 1.73
14 51.5% Greek_Thessaly + 48.5% Southwest_Russian @ 1.76
15 53.3% Estonian_Polish + 46.7% Central_Greek @ 1.79
16 67% Polish + 33% Cyprian @ 1.85
17 71.6% Bulgarian + 28.4% Russian_Smolensk @ 1.88
18 76.4% Bulgarian + 23.6% Lithuanian @ 1.93
19 74.2% Bulgarian + 25.8% Erzya @ 1.96
20 52.7% Belorussian + 47.3% Central_Greek @ 1.97
These results look rather Moldovan than Wallachian or Transylvanian to me. Your opinion?
I would say in Croatian autosomal average there is higher % kaykavians than their % in total Croatian population. Because Croatians wannabe as much possible more northern and central Euro shifted close to Austrians and Hungarians on "average."
In y dna they use predominantly Dalmatian and Herzegovinian samples for artificial pumping of I2a-Din, for the claim that haplo as Croatian.
"Latins (Catholics) are old cheaters" our peple said long time ago in our epic songs!
Have a read at this if you are curious about the situation. A bit old, but not much has changed since.
Update v12 (Raw)
https://i.imgur.com/VuAE2yk.png
I ran his data trough updated K13. Definitely full Moldovan IMO. Surname seem to be from Botosani district too on that map.
Distance to: X
4.06997543 Romanian_Botosani
4.24080134 Bosnian
4.35920519 Serbian_new
4.50043331 South_Croat_Morlach_Cluster
4.50470865 Romanian_North_Moldova_Bukovina
4.82304883 Romanian_South_Central_Moldova
4.82922354 Romanian_Average
4.87378703 Serb_Croatia
5.82579072 Serbian_Bosnia
6.30053966 Bulgarian_Sofia
Target: X
Distance: 1.4016% / 1.40157899 | ADC: 0.25x
63.0 Romanian_Botosani
16.2 Pomak_Central-Macedonia
7.8 Bosniak_Tuzla
5.4 Pomak_Xanthi
4.8 Bulgarian_Ruse
2.8 Bulgarian_Burgas
Target: X
Distance: 2.1127% / 2.11272287 | ADC: 0.5x
60.0 Romanian_Botosani
12.8 Romanian_South_Central_Moldova
11.6 Turk_N-Macedonia
8.0 Serbian_new
4.8 Pomak_Kavala
1.8 Pomak_Central-Macedonia
1.0 Pomak_Plovdiv
The Oceanian is just noise. Even 2 percent can be noise if it pops up only on one calculator. The Oceanians are basically Australian Aboriginals, they ain't Siberian at all.
Update v12 (Final)
I'll provide the average coordinates for K13 in a sec, so don't bother transcribing from the image
https://i.imgur.com/Ra4tijq.png
Exist this study about frequency of haplogroups in today Republic compared to Romania (Moldova region). And from southern parts the samples were taken from the same region, village Carahasani, neighboring with Caplani.
In that village exist just one haplogroup who seems to be of Turanic origin, N-P43. Theoretically, similar situation need to be in Caplani too. In the north, in Sofia, one individual have haplogroup Q.
Spoiler!