UPDATE: Interactive MDS analysis of the East Baltic
Component #1 seems to be largely a Finnic-like (Left) vs. Baltic-like (Right) component.
Component #2 is less obvious, or at least doesn't have a general rule like the first component.
Printable View
UPDATE: Interactive MDS analysis of the East Baltic
Component #1 seems to be largely a Finnic-like (Left) vs. Baltic-like (Right) component.
Component #2 is less obvious, or at least doesn't have a general rule like the first component.
The MDS seems a little unclear to me. I took the data from EU7c and applied it to a few individuals:
http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f3...Dimensions.gif
Let's say, RU35, RU38, RU43 and UARU1 are practically on the same spot in Gnuplot, but their admixture data are rather disparate (EU9b):
RU38 has a low East Euro score, UARU1 has a high one. RU38 has a major NW Euro score, UARU1 has a low one. RU35 has an above average Baltic score, RU43 a below average one.Code:RU35 RU38 RU43 UARU1
West European 0.00001 0.00001 0.04354 0.12867
East European 0.23711 0.10697 0.19530 0.27455
Northwest Euro 0.16932 0.26514 0.12118 0.00001
North European 0.00757 0.00001 0.13341 0.08963
East Asian 0.00001 0.00001 0.00948 0.00001
South European 0.09117 0.00001 0.10884 0.08717
Sub-Saharan 0.00001 0.00001 0.00001 0.00001
North Asian 0.00001 0.00695 0.01003 0.00001
Baltic 0.49481 0.62087 0.37817 0.41992
Genetic substructures across West Eurasia (DIY teaser)
My results:
27.54% Northeast_Euro
2.24% Sub-Saharan
0.00% North_African
0.87% South_Asian
49.94% West_Euro
0.93% Southeast_Asian
0.02% South_Siberian
0.00% North_Asian
0.01% East_Siberian
0.07% East_Asian
9.28% East_Mediterranean
1.32% Middle_Eastern
6.07% West_Asian
1.72% Volga-Ural
My results:
West_Asian 44.36
East_Mediterranean 24.61
Middle_Eastern 17.63
West_Euro 10.24
South_Asian 2.23
East_Asian 0.42
Volga-Ural 0.29
Northeast_Euro 0.12
Sub-Saharan 0.1
North_African 0
Southeast_Asian 0
South_Siberian 0
North_Asian 0
East_Siberian 0
DIY? DIFM please...
Yes. Eurogenes modification of the Dodecad DIY. Genetic substructures across West Eurasia (DIY teaser)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dušan
My results in that K14, test tool:
35.26% Northeast_Euro
0.04% Sub-Saharan
0.00% North_African
0.01% South_Asian
49.38% West_Euro
0.00% Southeast_Asian
0.00% South_Siberian
0.00% North_Asian
0.01% East_Siberian
0.00% East_Asian
2.32% East_Mediterranean
3.69% Middle_Eastern
5.14% West_Asian
4.15% Volga-Ural
63.00% West_Euro
16.89% East_Mediterranean
13.31% Northeast_Euro
3.50% Middle_Eastern
1.16% North_African
1.10% Sub-Saharan
0.73% East_Siberian
0.27% East_Asian
Looking forward for something more groundbreaking. Some results are a bit off too, low NA and high SSA
Well, that certainly is quite general. I would have preferred a North European and a West Mediterranean cluster as well. This way, everyone seems part-Northeast European, and it is largely impossible to tell apart between East Europeans.
82.35% Northeast_Euro
11.85% West_Euro
2.45% East_Mediterranean
1.82% Middle_Eastern
0.72% West_Asian
0.77% Volga-Ural
0.04% South_Asian
0.00% Sub-Saharan
0.00% North_African
0.00% Southeast_Asian
0.00% South_Siberian
0.00% North_Asian
0.00% East_Siberian
0.00% East_Asian
I have a lower Volga score than Germans and Englishmen :)
After some of my experiments, I doubt there that is a general North African cluster. It seems this was a composite, and soaking up a lot of Sub-Saharan African.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kadu
So I tried to break it up. That left only 50-60% North African in the Mozabite Berbers, and higher Middle Eastern and Sub-Saharan scores in everyone who used to score North African.
This can be done with a lot of clusters that represent large regions, but are based on small groups of people from the same ethnic groups.
I think the ADMIXTURE run will be different for you. From memory it was. But I didn't save the results.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanophage
It looks like the DIY didn't get the same amount of detail because you matched other Russians so well.