From the genetic studies I've seen, the EEF were likely at least Olive skin toned with dark hair & eyes like Mediterraneans (which makes sense do to their Anatolian & Levantine ancestryQuote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
Printable View
From the genetic studies I've seen, the EEF were likely at least Olive skin toned with dark hair & eyes like Mediterraneans (which makes sense do to their Anatolian & Levantine ancestryQuote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
They would of been the "darkest" of the three by far. Indo Europeans were pale skinned, and late hunter gatherers who had adjusted to the climate were mainly blonde and white. Modern Sardinians have elevated EEF, but are heavily hunter gatherer in Y dna (i2a1a).Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOldNorth
This is not really what the data say: Hunter Gatherer lacks a light skin gene, unlike the Early European Farmer who had this gene. This does not mean that the Early European Farmer had no people in their population who had a more tanned skin color or conversely, a lighter skin color ... Same for Hunther Gatherer: no one said they had black skin, but it's assumed they have more darker skin than Early European Farmer for the reason i mentioned above.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOldNorth
On this site we can see the pigmentation of England N (Neolithic):
https://genetiker.wordpress.com/pigmentation/
Which one am I if I'm I2/I-M438 and my subclade is I-Z17855?
I2a1Quote:
Originally Posted by arkas
O.M.G my ancestor in the Roman legion!
http://solarey.net/wp-content/upload...omans-00-1.jpg
R1b-L21. Don't want to post the specific subclade as for some reason, googling it actually links back to my family surname lol.
R1a-M417 (most likely)
Why most likely? Did you do a DNA Test?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyp Snow
I did the MorleyDNA.com Predictor. Other users said it's pretty accurate for telling the main Hg. I'm aware that it doesn't mean anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Armenian Bishop
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ediction/page9