This science is at its infancy don't expect 0.01 accuracy.It's good enough for a general idea though.
Printable View
Daniel take in consideration we have very few samples of mesolithic europeans, yet we need more samples
Population
ANE 11.77%
ASE 1.39%
WHG-UHG 44.59%
East_Eurasian -
West_African -
East_African -
ENF 42.26%
I honestly don't know, you'll have to ask Polako on that one.
It is found in the oldest Europeans. You are going way back before then probably. Before the arrival into Europe. That is a guess.
Ajvide58
ANE 17.92
ASE 5.21
WHG-UHG 66.67
East_Eurasian 8.68
West_African 0.17
East_African 1.34
ENF 0
Gokhem2
ANE 3.41
ASE 4.09
WHG-UHG 52.56
East_Eurasian 7.37
West_African 0
East_African 0.83
ENF 31.72
Oetzi
ANE 0.02
ASE 1.33
WHG-UHG 38.49
East_Eurasian 7.57
West_African 0.06
East_African 2.32
ENF 50.2
ASE might be related to the ancient Mongoloid immigration wave into Europe which would have peaked in the Northeast.
Or it could just be that Easterners are more Asian influenced anyway.
I think this shows that the WHG-UHG component has a lot of alleles in it that either came in with the early Neolithic farmers from the Near East or were from Balkan hunter-gatherers that were absorbed into the early Neolithic farming groups very early on since NE5 and NE7 have a lot of the WHG-UHG component among them yet in the recent study on them in the ADMIXTURE test they used they look very Sardinian like (green) component. and only show extremely small amounts of the yellow North European like component.
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/14...ms6257_F4.html
My results are quite close to yours for the main 3 components :)
Mine:
Population
ANE 16.64%
ASE 1.86%
WHG-UHG 63.80%
East_Eurasian -
West_African 0.49%
East_African 0.28%
ENF 16.93%
My parents:
Mum's:
Population
ANE 16.76%
ASE 2.67%
WHG-UHG 63.15%
East_Eurasian -
West_African 1.02%
East_African -
ENF 16.40%
Dad's:
Population
ANE 17.38%
ASE 1.61%
WHG-UHG 62.12%
East_Eurasian -
West_African -
East_African 0.27%
ENF 18.61%