Printable View
If Bulgars were mostly at Northeast region of Bulgaria, somewhere near Silistra, then Bulgarian refugees from this region who moved to Ukraine, probably are the most Bulgar Bulgarians in this case, because they did not mix with Western Bulgarians who came due to Communism to to east Bulgaria, like Kaspias saidQuote:
Originally Posted by War Chef
I'm not a genetist nor a antropologist, i just try to follow the "spoilers" from that bulgarian study. So, i don't who were those gentlemen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfEck9mUoJAQuote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
By the way, Thracian and Dacian DNA has lots of "west-med" Sardinian-like DNA and lacks west-Asian.
Where did Kaspias write that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Abriekman
Do you know which components they use at the final part of the video? Eastern-Mediterranean,European,North african etc?Quote:
Originally Posted by War Chef
"1- Eastern Bulgaria, where Proto-Bulgars settled, was a Turkish region before the Russo-Turkish War. The Bulgars who had lived there mixed with Turks. Most of the Bulgarians who live in the East now came from the West during Communism."- Kaspias said. I think he means Bulgarians and Turks, who lived in this region were admixed with Bulgars, but now there are not Bulgarians in Bulgaria, who has, that high Bulgar admix, that inhabitants of this region had before because of mixing with Bulgarians of other regions. Refugees to Russian Empire from this region of Bulgaria can save this admix, because mixed with each other in isolation in other countryQuote:
Originally Posted by War Chef
This is my result, I added Hun_Avar_Szolad for my Slavic ancestry
Distance: 2.2586% / 0.02258608
Target: Abriekman_scaled
84.7 Slavs
6.8 Romans
6.7 Proto-Bulgars
1.8 Magyars
My Anthropologies. I thought that was your own calculatorQuote:
Originally Posted by andre
Yes, it’s my amateur calculator.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick
..