Longobards appear to be showing up in most Northwestern/Northern Europeans just different orders. The Longobards are very northern genetically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Matxe92
Printable View
Longobards appear to be showing up in most Northwestern/Northern Europeans just different orders. The Longobards are very northern genetically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Matxe92
Quote:
Originally Posted by *****
Damn, you kill the Bulgars who claim that we are Bulgars.Quote:
Originally Posted by *****
Are Iberians actually just lost Tracians and Illyrians? It seems they are from the results on these tests. :p
Dio Cassius would say, "let us not forget that Trajan was a true-born Thracian.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vojnik
The fights between Trajan and Decebalus were fratricidal wars, and the Thracians were Dacians."
Trajan was Born in SPAIN!!!
Also our Scythian + Roman mix means that Scythian (Slavic) Mass Immigration actually happened in certain degree.
But Paternally I think Thracians were I2 people mostly while Greeks and Romans ended with J2, E1b
My combined 23andMe and Living dna using 20=1st 19=2nd etc
Celtic Briton (0 AD) - Hinxton 4 40
Bronze Age Celt England (1000 BC) - I5383 37
Celtic/Viking Iceland (1000 AD) - VDP-A6 36
Nordic Lombard (670 AD) - CL92 29
Alemannic Bavaria (500 AD) - ALH_10 26
Briton Gladiator York (250 AD) - 6DRIF-23 25
Anglo Saxon (700 AD) - Hinxton HS3 23
Nordic Lombard (590 AD) - SZ4 22
Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) - 6DRIF-3 21
Late Medieval Gotlander (1600 AD) - Unknown 20
Pict (670 AD) - CL83 20
Ireland Copper Age (1880 BC) - Rathlin2 19
Czech Velke Prilepy (0 AD) - Rise577 16
Nordic Lombard (590 AD) - SZ15 16
Bronze Age Jutland Denmark (1400 BC) - Rise47 15
Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) - 3DRIF-16 15
Alemannic Bavaria (500 AD) - AED_249 11
Nordic Lombard (670 AD) - CL92 11
Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) - SZ38 10
Viking Sweden (1100 AD) - Sigtuna stg021 6
https://i.imgur.com/wQVeW0C.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/MfnLJse.jpg
Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
1. Ottoman (1500 AD) (14.51)
2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (15.07)
3. Copper Age Armenia (4000 BC) (16.53)
4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (17.01)
5. Medieval Iran (1450 AD) (18.49)
6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (19.02)
7. Bronze Age Armenia (1500 BC) (20.38)
8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (20.68)
9. Iron Age Kurdistan (900 BC) (20.74)
10. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (22.89)
11. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (24.53)
Your closest genetic modern populations...
1. Turkish (8.376)
2. Azeri (9.894)
3. Turkmen (12.19)
4. Kurdish (15.24)
5. [Hidden] - upgrade your account
6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account
7. [Hidden] - upgrade your account
8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account
Longobards are a Germanic tribe. It's not your polish.Quote:
Originally Posted by Matxe92
I would thumb this up but I also lost the function lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by North Sea
I'm surprised for one. You (portuguese) appear so eastern, albeit ancient, from these.Quote:
Originally Posted by Restless Kiwi
No cannanite/semite hereQuote:
Originally Posted by ModernMaskil
Likes are not allowed for me, for some reason. +1. Your scores are similar to mine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas
Not mine
Kievan Rus (11.7)
Sarmatian + Kievan Rus (12.61)
Sarmatian + Avar (13.48)
https://mytrueancestry.com/c/image.py?&j=m16oenbe9s
I cant see them, but you dont have to upload, just right click on the image and you can post them here. Curious to see your results after the other portuguese I saw.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas
Can you see now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulu
Yes! What about Spanish, do they score same as Portuguese?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas
I haven't seen Spanish results but I assume that they do. The three of us get close approximations to Spanish samples and my gf even gets Galiza as her best fit, so most Iberians will score Gallo-Roman\Illyrian plus something else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulu
+1 my extremely distant ancient bruvQuote:
Originally Posted by Nazarene
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernMaskil
No, but I don't believe there are any Caananite samples. And while there is no Semite, that one spot on the edge at the intersection of Turkey and Iran is firmly Middle Eastern, as is the Hittite sample.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulu
Keep in mind that this is based on autosomal distance, based on which Ashkenazi Jews are close neither to ancient Levantines nor Poles but rather cluster firmly with South Italians, as the website show.
What are your results?Quote:
Originally Posted by xripkan
I sent them email with attached AncestryDNA raw data file and friendly message, do you think I will get results soon?
It shows Y-DNA famous peopleQuote:
Originally Posted by Markos
Are these results accurate for mixed peoples?
Hellenic Romans, Romans and Ostrogoths( based on Greek origin Crimea Ostrogoth sample). I cannot upload it now because it has expired but I remember I also had matches the Mycenean Greeks, the Illyrian and the Scythian 270 BC. I used the V5 raw data file but I suppose it would not be much different if I used the converted V3. To be honest I was not impressed. I find K36 ancient genomes similarity better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Markos
I think its also because Illyrians/Thracians were a little more south-west shifted. At least the samples discovered so far. Illyrians come out like Spanish/North Italian like. Its exactly these 2 scoring closer, I imagine all our results would change as the database grows and they average out each sample group.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas
Ah okay. What is the K36 ancient genome similarity exactly? Was it that one with the charts?Quote:
Originally Posted by xripkan
This one http://gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/ancient.htmQuote:
Originally Posted by Markos
It shows how close you are with more genomes. At the other page we have to pay to see our full oracle. In addition I am not sure about the interpretation of results. For example the Roman samples are really Romans?
Ah yeah this is the one I meant. Ya it'd be cool to see the GEDMatch results of all the reference population groups they use for their results, definitely.Quote:
Originally Posted by xripkan
I think I got Canaanite/Semite on mine.Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernMaskil
Thanks for user @Paradox she has offer to help me but then I got my result.
Scythian + Avar (10.83)
Avar + Kievan Rus (11.2)
Scythian (12.11)
Avar (12.15)
Kievan Rus (12.42)
I got one too, I posted it on page 6.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nazarene
Thats right move your longboard, celt, roman jew ass from here boy! Hahah
#SCYTHIANSISTHRACIANS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nazarene
Fair enough, I'm not particularly surprised though. Again it's a based on Autosomal distance. I'd probably get one somewhere near the end of the top 20.Quote:
Originally Posted by talombo
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernMaskil
Check out page 23 for my results. I got Canaanite/Semite.
Nice results niggers
I know, North Germanic to be specific. But theres probably some sort of slight slavic element in Longobards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gründig
25% Polish should influence one of them, and it's not Vikings.
So that might be the reason im drawn more towards Longobards rather than vikings.