Andalusian autosomal result

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leto

Hey, can you share your K36 results for a map?

---

Eurogenes K36 Admixture Proportions


Population
Amerindian -
Arabian -
Armenian 0.06 Pct
Basque 10.27 Pct
Central_African -
Central_Euro 3.51 Pct
East_African 0.16 Pct
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 4.03 Pct
East_Central_Asian 0.07 Pct
East_Central_Euro 2.24 Pct
East_Med -
Eastern_Euro 0.11 Pct
Fennoscandian 0.68 Pct
French 2.81 Pct
Iberian 22.66 Pct
Indo-Chinese -
Italian 8.41 Pct
Malayan -
Near_Eastern 1.33 Pct
North_African 3.96 Pct
North_Atlantic 12.55 Pct
North_Caucasian 3.57 Pct
North_Sea 10.08 Pct
Northeast_African 1.87 Pct
Oceanian -
Omotic -
Pygmy 0.11 Pct
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian -
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural 0.30 Pct
West_African -
West_Caucasian 1.57 Pct
West_Med 9.67 Pct

I´m with the name: Juan

MDS plot (with minimum spanning tree)
Here are not only the dots and branches connected with you important, but also the dots nearest to you, just to a lesser extent. A span of longer distance on a
branch shows also shows a greater genetic distance to you.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RbJv3DGuZ...0/MDSplot.jpeg

CA (Correspondence Analysis plot)
In the case of mixed individuals (with distant ancestry) thIs tool will show them as a mid-point between their ancestral admixtures.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AlbkTAGZa...cssection.jpeg

Euclidean distances map
From most to less similar population to your sample. Although top of the list is
nearly similar to ordering in correlation list, nevertheless lower positions are in
better order (for exmple at the bottom every Europan has Melanesians,
Amerindians and Africans) compared to distant position on the correlation list
which were random, so I don't provide them.
[IMG]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NiLkbDddDWA/XhpcYmB-5eI/AAAAAAAACKI/zhlVxDIN4W0TOHWfE1L
oYsovPFeTx3XwCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/maparojo.jpeg[/IMG]

Correlation map
Below is a Pearson`s linear correlation map which compares your results to
different regional averages around the world (scale – 1, 1). In the case of mixed
persons with distant parental admixtures, the top results are often midpoint
between them, however results lower down the list should show areas from the
derived parental admixtures. For many people this is the best way to show their
actual regional ancestry. It's also worth mentioning that some similar genetic
regions like those from the North Sea Germanic cluster can show up even if they
aren't part of your actual ancestry. The map is a graphical representation of the
correlation values list.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Z3WsHOmpq...600/mape2.jpeg

nMonte3 oracle
nMonte3 provides you with frequencies related to your recent ancestry. It is also very adept at detecting subtle regional differences. Author of nMonte alghoritm -
Ger Huijbregts.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0MYrhnbAc...es3Oracle.jpeg

Admix4 oracle (two methods, one of them is usually more speculative)
The oracle works in a similar way to the Gedmatch Oracles, though the estimates here are far more robust. One shouldn‘t take all of them literaly, but rather as
extreme examples of possible diistant admixtures. Admix4 is a different tool which is similar to the Gedmatch oracles. it compares your frequencies to the list of most
similar averages ( The same process as nMonte single item distances) or models you as a combination (two-way, three-way, or four-way) of different populations. In
some cases it will be in line with the actual ethnic combination you inherited from your parents and grandparents ancestries. It may be the case that different
populations show up in each oracle, especially for people of a mixed background. Author of Admix4 oracle - Alexander Burnashev .

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bjV45jspu...pulations.jpeg

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uCGFDJ3hm...pulations.jpeg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gallop

I´m with the name: Juan
tance to you.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RbJv3DGuZ...0/MDSplot.jpeg

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AlbkTAGZa...cssection.jpeg


[IMG]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NiLkbDddDWA/XhpcYmB-5eI/AAAAAAAACKI/zhlVxDIN4W0TOHWfE1L
oYsovPFeTx3XwCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/maparojo.jpeg[/IMG]
.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Z3WsHOmpq...600/mape2.jpeg


https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0MYrhnbAc...es3Oracle.jpeg



https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bjV45jspu...pulations.jpeg

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uCGFDJ3hm...pulations.jpeg

---

So it was you. In in single distances or on the map you have Huelva at the top, for Andalusian is good match. But interesingly in oracle you are somewhat French shifted.

But in this oracle you were majority south Spanish.
https://i.imgur.com/zwobnMi.png

Nice LM report you seem French shifted though mine I came out going Eastward

https://imgur.com/a/B7DH0oB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lukasz

So it was you. In in single distances or on the map you have Huelva at the top, for Andalusian is good match. But interesingly in oracle you are somewhat French shifted.

But in this oracle you were majority south Spanish.
https://i.imgur.com/zwobnMi.png

---

Yes, Huelva appears first when France and Italy are taken out. I look for the result that is more complete and enlightening.

targeted nMonte Oracle (without French
and Italian references)

ES_Huelva 56
ES_Aragón 11.8
ES_Extremadura 10
ES_Galicia 6
ES_Cataluna 4.6
ES_Leon 4
ES_País_Vasco 3.8
Saharawi 0.8
Moroccan_South 0,6
South_Morocco_Berbers 0.4
TUN_Tunis 0.4
Copt_Sudan 0.4
Portugal_South 0.4
ALG_Oase_Berber 0.2
East_Moroccan_Berbers 0.2

In all oracles it is Cantabria that always appears first. Aunque en esta PCA 2D It is best seen between the Franco-Cantabrian zone and Aragon.

Your closest genetic modern populations...
1. Spanish_Cantabria (6.258)
2. Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha (7.723)
3. Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon (8.458)
4. Southwest_French (8.469)
5. Spanish_Aragon (8.66)
6. Spanish_Cataluna (9.217)
7. Spanish_Extremadura (9.510)
8. Spanish_Andalucia (9.892)

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6c7W_U-GZ...enero2019.jpeg

I am publishing all my results of the dozens of existing calculators. Sometimes there are small differences, but more or less I already get an idea where the subject is going. Huelva is the first time it has come out in such a remarkable way, I really don't have any ancestors from Huelva that I know of, yes from the province of Cádiz and some from the province of Malaga; in this case I can understand it as Andalusia-South; although in the last value appears South of Andalusia-South with its own value.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gallop

Yes, Huelva appears first when France and Italy are taken out. I look for the result that is more complete and enlightening.


I am publishing all my results of the dozens of existing calculators. Sometimes there are small differences, but more or less I already get an idea where the subject is going. Huelva is the first time it has come out in such a remarkable way, I really don't have any ancestors from Huelva that I know of, yes from the province of Cádiz and some from the province of Malaga; in this case I can understand it as Andalusia-South; although in the last value appears South of Andalusia-South with its own value.

---

Probably Huelva is more straightforward south Spain result in my spreadsheet because it is small region and so so admixed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gallop

Eurogenes K36 Admixture Proportions


Population
Amerindian -
Arabian -
Armenian 0.06 Pct
Basque 10.27 Pct
Central_African -
Central_Euro 3.51 Pct
East_African 0.16 Pct
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 4.03 Pct
East_Central_Asian 0.07 Pct
East_Central_Euro 2.24 Pct
East_Med -
Eastern_Euro 0.11 Pct
Fennoscandian 0.68 Pct
French 2.81 Pct
Iberian 22.66 Pct
Indo-Chinese -
Italian 8.41 Pct
Malayan -
Near_Eastern 1.33 Pct
North_African 3.96 Pct
North_Atlantic 12.55 Pct
North_Caucasian 3.57 Pct
North_Sea 10.08 Pct
Northeast_African 1.87 Pct
Oceanian -
Omotic -
Pygmy 0.11 Pct
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian -
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural 0.30 Pct
West_African -
West_Caucasian 1.57 Pct
West_Med 9.67 Pct

---

Interesante todo tus resultados. Estan parecidos a los de Spaniard 2.0, que plotea bastante al norte tambien.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lukasz

Probably Huelva is more straightforward south Spain result in my spreadsheet because it is small region and so so admixed.

---

https://www.mapasdeespana.com/comuni...provincias.png

Huelva is not a region is a province of the 8 that has the region or autonomous community of Andalusia and as in the rest of Spanish provinces its capital gives name to the entire province. They are quite balanced I do not see Huelva much smaller than the rest of Andalusian regions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gallop

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dxuqlNMiB...%25ADgenes.jpg

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ptr8NGumY...25282%2529.png

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-m58DxVGM0...litude.htm.png

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wQLbMiK7v...25281%2529.png

K7
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8bHVgQvg8...25281%2529.png


Hi all. I am getting these results and I would like to know your opinions.

---

Its interesting how Zagoraza, Cantabria and Valladolid appear the closest to Andalusia. I thought Extremadura and Catalonia would be ahead. Basques are obviously far and that expected, but also galicians are the farest among peninsulares and also Baleares is extremely far. In Europe, it interesting how people from Belfast in Northern Ireland are closer than people living around Rome and London. At last, its strange how far is USA with only 19 when England is very close with 60, its also expected Argentina with 66 because of their italians and Venezuelans ahead of other hispanics because of probably their whites were the most testes. Unfortunately Brazil and Uruguay dont have numbers, but it would be very high, especially for Uruguay.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gallop

Eurogenes K36 Admixture Proportions


Population
Amerindian -
Arabian -
Armenian 0.06 Pct
Basque 10.27 Pct
Central_African -
Central_Euro 3.51 Pct
East_African 0.16 Pct
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 4.03 Pct
East_Central_Asian 0.07 Pct
East_Central_Euro 2.24 Pct
East_Med -
Eastern_Euro 0.11 Pct
Fennoscandian 0.68 Pct
French 2.81 Pct
Iberian 22.66 Pct
Indo-Chinese -
Italian 8.41 Pct
Malayan -
Near_Eastern 1.33 Pct
North_African 3.96 Pct
North_Atlantic 12.55 Pct
North_Caucasian 3.57 Pct
North_Sea 10.08 Pct
Northeast_African 1.87 Pct
Oceanian -
Omotic -
Pygmy 0.11 Pct
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian -
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural 0.30 Pct
West_African -
West_Caucasian 1.57 Pct
West_Med 9.67 Pct

---

Le he echado una leida a tu K36, calculadora que a mi me gusta mucho, y mi breve conclusion es que tu a juro debes ser ascendiente de la repoblacion del norte de Europa en Sierra Morena. Tienes un absurdo nivel de north-atlantic/north-sea, sumado a lo que sacas de central-euro/east-central-euro y lo que rascas de fennoscandian que esto no es comun fuera de Galicia/Extremadura/Portugal/Asturias, me indica a juro, ascendencia del Norte de Europa en Andalucia. Esto ya se ha visto antes, no es algo raro pero si poco comun.

A Spaniard 2.0 le sucede algo similar, la diferencia es que el rasca demasiado North-Sea.

Muy interesantes tus resultados, si puedes postear tu K47 de yourdnaportal seria la hostia, es un k36 mas actualizado con 11 componentes mas, y tambien te recomiendo el G25.