R1a-z93 in Kyrgyz people. Explanation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eatensemn

Not really. Go and check every research. All they have found is mostly a caucasoid male lying besides a mongoloid female (and a horse).

---

Nope. Out of all samples gathered from the steppe coridor, none had a dominant mtDNA line. It's mixed as it goes.
http://open-genomes.org/analysis/Eur..._Gedmatch.html

Not to mention even westernmost scythians were morphologically mongoloids and had a significant mongoloid input in their aDNA. So your theory about handsome aryan men falls here. They were never cockasoids in first place. :laugh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eatensemn

Of course there are some mongoloid males with caucasoid females and other boring same type couples. But your "y-dna micronationalism" is just a
joke and has no chance to change the history.

---

I'm the one who tries to change history :lol:? You're literally trying to whitewash turks here lmao.

"..and other boring same type couples" what kind of sick fetish is this xD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aklifal

You're literally trying to whitewash turks here lmao.

---

Turks, or proto-turks horribly predate white concepts. And i strongly believe that important amount of mongoloid in early turks comes from actual mongolians, turks lived side by side with them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eatensemn

Turks, or proto-turks horribly predate white concepts. And i strongly believe that important amount of mongoloid in early turks comes from actual mongolians, turks lived side by side with them.

---

Now thats wrong. I also think early turkics werent more than 50% east eurasian, except some cases, but they were at least 20-30% mongoloid. Even Xiognu were between 30-70%, they definitely played an important role of the ethnogenesis of early turkics.

double