AreYouWhite G25 Calculator (AYW)

Distance to: Fabricius_simulated_g25_scaled
0.58664821 Amerindian_Native
0.59512390 East_Asian
0.70563317 African_Nigerian
0.79567452 Oceanian_Papuan




For those who are curious:
1.
I am white with very light skin, I turn red easily under the sun; My hair is dark blonde or light brown (depending on ambient lighting); 1.77m tall; Light brown, red, or honey-yellow eyes, depending on the lighting; full lips, but not too thick; Mesocephalic, my dental arch however, is narrow and pointed.

2.
MyHeritage v0.95
Iberian 47.7%
Sardinian 13.3%
Baltic 12.1%
Scandinavian 9.2%
Ashkenazi Jew 4.2%
Greek and South Italian 0.9%
North African 6.0%
Nigerian 5.8%
Sierra Leonean 0.8%

Interestingly, I am more distant from a tribe of South American Indians (and it is very possible, perhaps probable, that I have some indigenous ancestor from colonial times) than from the Indians of North America.

Distance to: Fabricius_simulated_g25_scaled
0.58664821 Amerindian_Native
0.59512390 East_Asian
0.70563317 African_Nigerian
0.71394065 Surui(South_Amerindian)
0.79567452 Oceanian_Papuan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabricius

Interestingly, I am more distant from a tribe of South American Indians (and it is very possible, perhaps probable, that I have some indigenous ancestor from colonial times) than from the Indians of North America.

Distance to: Fabricius_simulated_g25_scaled
0.58664821 Amerindian_Native
0.59512390 East_Asian
0.70563317 African_Nigerian
0.71394065 Surui(South_Amerindian)
0.79567452 Oceanian_Papuan

---

Are you Brazilian (guessing from brunolord answer), what is your known ancestry?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Upsilander

Are you Brazilian (guessing from brunolord answer), what is your known ancestry?

---

I only know even my great-grandparents superficially. I don't have well-documented ancestors, only reports.
A considerable part must be colonial.

My grandfather, who died when I was a child, told my father about a "German" ancestor who "didn't speak Portuguese very well" (I can't tell if he knew the person or just heard about him). My father was never very interested, not like me. So it was a doubt that I even had the possibility of doing a genetic test.

On my mother's side, what I have heard was about "Italians", which is possible, since I have the genetic group "northern Italians from Portugal in Minas Gerais and São Paulo". Another genetic group is the "Spanish", which I could already tell by one of my maternal grandfather's surnames, namely, "Lacerda" (La Cerda = can be bristles, pig's bristles or the animal female pig, well, I naturally prefer the generic bristles).

I know of no Black or Moorish blood relatives. I heard a lot about Amerindian ancestors, but if I do, it must be from 1800 A.D. or earlier.
The darker pigmentation of most of my relatives comes not from Amerindians, but from Africans or even dark Iberians. But since genetic percentage estimation per generation is not exact science, residual Amerindian DNA may not be as old as I suppose.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabricius

Distance to: Fabricius_simulated_g25_scaled
0.58664821 Amerindian_Native
0.59512390 East_Asian
0.70563317 African_Nigerian
0.79567452 Oceanian_Papuan




For those who are curious:
1.
I am white with very light skin, I turn red easily under the sun; My hair is dark blonde or light brown (depending on ambient lighting); 1.77m tall; Light brown, red, or honey-yellow eyes, depending on the lighting; full lips, but not too thick; Mesocephalic, my dental arch however, is narrow and pointed.

2.
MyHeritage v0.95
Iberian 47.7%
Sardinian 13.3%
Baltic 12.1%
Scandinavian 9.2%
Ashkenazi Jew 4.2%
Greek and South Italian 0.9%
North African 6.0%
Nigerian 5.8%
Sierra Leonean 0.8%

---

It makes sense, because you are more Nordic and Baltic than African. The North African thing doesn't count, because it is white Africa, and if you had some Arabic or sub-Saharan, the program would tell you and add separately...

Distance to: Kriptc_23nme
0.50936837 Amerindian_Native
0.54547976 East_Asian
0.67805268 African_Nigerian
0.77213847 Oceanian_Papuan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by R1b-L51

It makes sense, because you are more Nordic and Baltic than African. The North African thing doesn't count, because it is white Africa, and if you had some Arabic or sub-Saharan, the program would tell you and add separately...

---

Yes, agreed!
However, I did not pass the test according to the criteria of our friend Upsilander, a test that seems inspired by the American One-Drop Blood Rule (therefore stricter than the Nuremberg laws), I am not white.

jejejejeje

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabricius

Yes, agreed!
However, I did not pass the test according to the criteria of our friend Upsilander, a test that seems inspired by the American One-Drop Blood Rule (therefore stricter than the Nuremberg laws), I am not white.

jejejejeje

---

It's rather based on the borders of Europe but with tight requirements, for dramatic purposes ;)


Call 58-60-75-80 for additional support. The magic numbers of Snow Bunny inc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabricius

Yes, agreed!
However, I did not pass the test according to the criteria of our friend Upsilander, a test that seems inspired by the American One-Drop Blood Rule (therefore stricter than the Nuremberg laws), I am not white.

jejejejeje

---

I don't pass the blackness by a few decimals either, but it is still a clear Caucasian base with very slight spices. In this forum I have heard Russians who think of themselves as inferior races because they are 20% Asian. On the other hand, for Chinese or Japanese racists we would be trash (and they also think that about each other).
It all depends from where you look at it, like the theory of relativity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by R1b-L51

(...)It all depends from where you look at it (...)

---

Yes, there is something subjective and limited by cultural references, on the other hand there is something objective as well, which prevents us from extrapolating the considerations.
Well, I'm not a relativist or a nominalist, I think there's the absolute and the essential or universal. That some biological man feels like a woman does not imply that everyone is obliged to recognize him as such (In fact, I think that no one should be forced to agree to something); and if a man feels like a dog, he needs psychiatric treatment.

But the racial issue is not so clear: what does it mean to be "blond"? What does it mean to have "fair skin"? To those who read it, it seems obvious even to consider the spectrum of many layers of human types.

The ethnic question, then, is the closest to relativism, the most justified by subjective identification. A Sudeten German could have 75% Czech DNA and be "German." A woman who is 25% Jewish, if she has a Jewish maternal lineage, she is Jewish in relation to their criteria (hers and her people). The objective side is that it makes no sense for a Brazilian without East Asian ancestry to feel Japanese because he likes anime.

I am aware that I do not belong to a specific people (and I am not limited to DNA).

Any honest one has to admit that there is no such thing as "Brazilian culture" (a place that fits all countries in Europe excluding Russia). The attempt to force a "Brazilian identity", which I don't know when it began, intensified with Getúlio Vargas, and was dully insisted on by open television networks, especially at sporting events and during the odious carnival. When the two unifying principles of Brazil, namely the Imperial Crown and the Catholic Church, ended or were corrupted, "Brazil" became a definition reduced to the extent of land, being arbitrary beyond this geographical limit.

As for me, I like and identify with European culture in general: art (music, architecture, painting, literature and poetry); philosophy; traditional religiosity; the European History; languages (I love the Portuguese language); beauty in general). I feel pan-European.