Attachment 147381
100% Denmark IA
Printable View
Attachment 147381
100% Denmark IA
Very strong p-values.Quote:
Originally Posted by Birchy
100% Ireland EBA
Attachment 147384
100% Denmark IA
Attachment 147387
100% Norway IA
Attachment 147388
references:
Attachment 147385
Attachment 147386
I've got some more 100% models too. All are used with the above references.
I'm going to be modeling myself as 100% as whatever my deep dive matches are on MyTrueAncestry.com
Attachment 147389
Attachment 147390
deleted
I trimmed down the references to 10:
Attachment 147436
100% Denmark IA
Attachment 147437
100% Scotland MIA LIA
Attachment 147438
100% Ireland EBA
Attachment 147439
100% Norway IA
Attachment 147440
Still strong p values.
I want to see what you all get with that reference list.
I did some more single population modeling with the reference list from my post #446:
100% Scotland_IA.AG_I16504.AG
Attachment 147462
100% Wales_MIA.AG_I16405.AG
Attachment 147463
100% Czechia_IA_Hallstatt.AG
Attachment 147466
And for the grand finale:
100% Wales IA
Attachment 147464
from these two samples pooled together
Attachment 147465
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wunx...sTjxV4&index=1
Attachment 147467Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Attachment 147468
Attachment 147469
Stronger P values on the Germanic sources than Celtic sources for some reason lol
Same 10 rights as post #446
Norway IA + EGY TIP
Attachment 147470
VK202 + EGY TIP JK2911
Attachment 147471
Denmark IA + EGY TIP
Attachment 147473
Attachment 147472
:P
Attachment 147682
Reference populations: Mbuti.DG, Russia_Kostenki14_UP.SG, Luxembourg Mesolithic.G, Turkey Marmara Barcin_ N.AG,
Russia_Kalmykia_EBA_Yamnaya. SG, Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG, Norway_IA.SG, Lithuania_BA.AG,
Russia_MLBA_Sintashta.SG, Netherlands_LIA.AG
Attachment 147744
Someone on X did this one for me
Attachment 147776Quote:
Originally Posted by drb234
My attempt at a similar model on me lol
Steppe/EEF/WHG admix model with Austria EN LBK:
Attachment 147835
References:
Attachment 147836
Attachment 147841
Might try a few models with Netherlands IA samples to try and isolate the beaker component a bit better
What rights did you use?Quote:
Originally Posted by Birchy
Attachment 147859
These were rights I saw from an X.
Attachment 147860
With those same rights:
Attachment 147861
Attachment 147862
Attachment 147863
Attachment 147864Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Attachment 147865
Attachment 147866
I'll try those references and see what happens. In the mean time care to be my guinea pig? :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Birchy
I want to see what you score with this model:
Attachment 147867
and with these references
Attachment 147868
Attachment 147873Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Apologies for late response site has been down all day for me lol, these are my results on that model
Did you use those references I linked also? Quite a difference with the Natufian between us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Birchy
With those same references when you get some free time try the classic three-way Russia Samara EBA Yamnaya, Turkey Marmara Barcin N, and Luxembourg Mesolithic.
Mine:
Attachment 147874
Switched out Pinarbasi AHG for Boncuklu in the rights.
Attachment 147875
Attachment 147876
This one is with Pinarbasi in the rights:
Attachment 147877
^p-value isn't as good. My assumption with that is ANF is probably slightly higher than ~36%
Did that person on X give the references?Quote:
Originally Posted by Birchy
What I get with some variation of the 10 references I've used for the earlier post:
Attachment 147878
Attachment 147879
Attachment 147880
Attachment 147881
This one gives me higher Steppe. Bichon WHG and Pinarbasi in the rights instead of Boncuklu and Italy Epigravettian.
Attachment 147882
Attachment 147883
He didn’t share them with me but I believe he posted the rights he uses for Neolithic models somewhere so I’ll have a look, this is what I get on those two models you posted before:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Attachment 147884
Attachment 147885
I did something a bit unconventional. I modeled the Third Intermediate Period Ancient Egyptians with an EEF population.
Attachment 147978
Attachment 147979
I modeled NUE001 (Old Kingdom Egyptian) as Levant Neolithic + Iberomaurusian + Iran Neolithic:
Attachment 148017
Attachment 148018
Switched out Boncuklu for Pinarbasi AHG and the p value improved to a similar level as he is modeled in the Morez paper.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Attachment 148019
Attachment 148083
IA model on early Anglo-Americans from Maryland
Same one with me on G25:
Distance: 2.4917% / 0.02491726
39.8 Denmark_IA_CGG106503
34.0 England_LIA_I11142
26.2 France_IA_CGG023310
Sadly, I don't think the France IA and Denmark IA samples used in that model are in the dataset available on IllustrativeDNA's qpAdm. Someone should contact them and ask them to add more datasets on there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Birchy
Attachment 148097Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
What happened? Last time i used it, i had in in my model
EDIT: It's only in the AADR database, not in the HumanOrigins databse.
However, this sample is from Zealand, not Jutland.
As far as I know that France IA Hallstatt group of samples doesn't exist in the AADR on Illustrative unless it's Yonne, Aube, Aisne just named differently.Quote:
Originally Posted by N-rg
Attachment 148111
Kenyan Somali in AT1 qpAdm model by me
I'm having some issues trying to model various Mena groups with ANF. I assumed some combination of references should yield a passing p value considering Levant Neolithic is I believe around 40% ANF admix.
Attachment 148117
Attachment 148118
^
Trying CHG as a source too to see if that is what it needs.
I'm having the same issue with Palestinians too.
I did another model measuring ANF admix in Egypt Third Intermediate Period samples.
Attachment 148129
References:
Attachment 148130
A person in the Youtube comments was telling me that MENA groups from the "Levant, North Africa, Middle East" have "very little" ANF admix. Well I did this model and the one with the LBK EEFs, and ~17-18% for a more southern Mena population doesn't qualify as "very little" in my book.
Edit: I just did another one from medieval Syria. On IllustrativeDNA he is labeled as an Arab.
Attachment 148131
Ask and you shall receive they say. IllustrativeDNA updated to AADR v66. One thing that sucks is that all my preset rights are gone.
A steppe/ANF/WHG model of myself with the new dataset:
I'm using the Compatibility V. 66
Attachment 148151
Attachment 148149
Rights:
Attachment 148150
I tried doing a full HG model. EHG, CHG, Zagros HG, AHG, Natufian, and WHG.
Attachment 148154
Attachment 148155
I switched to using AADR 1240k v66 instead of the compatibility version.
Anyone want to try their hand at admix modelling France_HautsdeFrance_Oise_IA (pooled) with Steppe/ANF/WHG? In other datasets they might be called France_Oise_IA.
These are the samples: Attachment 148231
I've tried probably over 20 times with different variations of these rights:
Attachment 148232
I switched the sources to France Mesolithic/Greece EN/ Latvia LN Cordedware and that didn't work.
This technically isn't qpadm but... I wrote python code that goes through qpfstats output (F2/Fst) and calculates the closest population combo that approximates the target sample. If you buy my qpAdm reports, this will come with them.
My pricing is: Pay to dusqcomputer@gmail.com via Paypal 9$ for fst/f2/f4 analysis (AT1), 7$ for QPADM modeling (AT1), 7$ for custom ethnicity calculator based on Fst/F2 tables (AT1)
These results would be covered under "custom ethnicity calculator based on Fst/F2 tables"
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...orm?usp=header
My mom's result (MyHeritage file, v62 dataset)
Attachment 148253
My result (MyHeritage file, v62 dataset)
Attachment 148254
Eurogenes K13 result for my mom:
Using 1 populations approximation
1 100% Kargopol_Russian @ 3.414
2 100% Erzya @ 5.774
3 100% Estonian_Polish @ 6.601
4 100% Southwest_Russian @ 7.186
5 100% Russian_Smolensk @ 7.196
6 100% Belorussian @ 7.391
7 100% East_Finnish @ 7.550
8 100% Lithuanian @ 7.676
9 100% Ukrainian_Belgorod @ 8.076
10 100% Estonian @ 8.572
Using 4 populations approximation
1 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% Lithuanian + 25% Lithuanian + 25% Chuvash @ 2.066
2 25% Erzya + 25% Erzya + 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% East_Finnish @ 2.138
3 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Erzya + 25% Estonian @ 2.432
4 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Erzya + 25% Lithuanian @ 2.595
5 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Lithuanian @ 2.713
6 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Belorussian @ 3.009
7 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Estonian_Polish @ 3.106
8 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian @ 3.414
Distance: 1.62
45.80% Erzya
27.60% Estonian
12.20% Lithuanian
07.00% Estonian_Polish
03.80% Saami_Finland
01.80% Kargopol_Russian
01.00% Tujia
00.40% Japanese
00.40% She
Eurogenes K13 result for me:
Using 1 populations approximation
1 100% Kargopol_Russian @ 4.416
2 100% Estonian_Polish @ 5.334
3 100% Russian_Smolensk @ 5.719
4 100% Southwest_Russian @ 6.073
5 100% Belorussian @ 6.724
6 100% Ukrainian_Belgorod @ 6.999
7 100% Erzya @ 7.440
8 100% Polish @ 7.745
9 100% Lithuanian @ 7.779
10 100% Ukrainian @ 8.117
Using 4 populations approximation
1 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Erzya + 25% Ukrainian + 25% Estonian @ 2.874
2 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Lithuanian + 25% Ukrainian @ 2.880
3 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% Estonian_Polish @ 3.265
4 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Polish @ 3.370
5 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Estonian_Polish @ 3.428
6 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% Erzya @ 3.932
7 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% Estonian_Polish + 25% Erzya @ 4.416
8 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian + 25% Kargopol_Russian @ 5.334
36.20% Erzya
29.60% Lithuanian
21.40% Estonian
05.00% Kargopol_Russian
03.80% Sardinian
02.20% Ukrainian
00.80% She
00.40% Mayan
00.40% Tujia
00.20% Karitiana
I decided to have some fun and model myself with NUE001. He's an Old Kingdom Egyptian dated to around 2800 BC.
Attachment 148345
Attachment 148346
This one is from the same list of references.
Attachment 148347
This model is with Turkey N instead of Turkey Epipaleolithic (Pinarbasi AHG)
Attachment 148348
England Bell beaker + NUE001:
Attachment 148361
Attachment 148362
Switzerland Bell beaker + NUE001. Same Rights:
Attachment 148363
More shenanigans with NUE001
Attachment 148386
References:
Attachment 148388
Attachment 148387
references:
Attachment 148389
I think Levant among those regions have the highest ANF. Egypt received ANF admix over time and modern Egyptians have higher ANF than those samples.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
AndreiDNA did a video on an ancient Egyptian that is new from the Akbari study. Time period I think is still unknown. He was Y-haplo J2a. He also had a respectable amount of ANF also. I just wish we had more aDNA samples from the Old Kingdom, Middle Kingdom, and the Predynastic period. I'm just wondering if some native Egyptians had similar levels of ANF like the individuals from the Third Intermediate Period but in earlier times. I always see stuff saying that ancient Egyptians are close to Levant Neolithic. Levant neolithic from what I have seen is almost half ANF.Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdEB-_daS24&t=1s