Ford's (Bosnian Serb) autosomal results

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pribislav

I'm defending Romanian interests. :)
I see Moldavians (Latin speaking) as Romanians in denial. You guys remind me on Montenegrins, who are Serbs in denial.

---

Nah man, you just consider Romanians subhumans, I know your animalic hate especially to Vlachs, and the fear to not be related to them. And Moldavians since are more North shifted, of course don't fit you agenda of average nigger subhumans like you consider Romanians. This is the short explanation of your defending.

And Moldavian identity is older than today Romanian, which is very politized. Majority of Moldavians in RM did not identify themselves as Romanians, is a XIXth century concept under influence of French Revolution ideas. Today Romanian identity is just Wallachian one, in mentality, language and many others aspects. Even the name Romania was applied before 1859 only to Wallachia.

The majority of old timers I've spoken with say they could never quite place Tito's accent..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IncelSlayer

There's a shit ton more russians/ukraineans in R.Moldova than 11% but just like gypsies they declare themselves under this new "moldovan" banner.
Around a quarter are rus/ukr and from the rest of romanians there most have atleast one rus/ukr relative down the line.

---

You mean Romanians in denial from Moldova so called national Moldavians trying to moldavized Russians, Ukrainians, Gagauz, Gypsies, Bulgarians... who are Moldavian citizens.

In Montenegro anti-Serbian national Montentenegins are brainwashed Serbs. They trying to montenegrized rest of Serbs in Montenegro who are still Serbs, and Muslims/Bosniaks, Gypsies and Croatians. Only Albanians are untouched with montenegrization.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El_Moldovano

Nah man, you just consider Romanians subhumans, I know your animalic hate especially to Vlachs, and the fear to not be related to them. And Moldavians since are more North shifted, of course don't fit you agenda of average nigger subhumans like you consider Romanians. This is the short explanation of your defending.

And Moldavian identity is older than today Romanian, which is very politized. Majority of Moldavians in RM did not identify themselves as Romanians, is a XIXth century concept under influence of French Revolution ideas. Today Romanian identity is just Wallachian one, in mentality, language and many others aspects. Even the name Romania was applied before 1859 only to Wallachia.

---

Wrong.
Romanians and Serbs are very friendly nations.

Modern Romania was created in 1859, so what? Have you ever heard for Ţara Românească?

Why Vlachs from eastern Serbia called themselves Rumani much before 1859?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IncelSlayer

There's a shit ton more russians/ukraineans in R.Moldova than 11% but just like gypsies they declare themselves under this new "moldovan" banner.
Around a quarter are rus/ukr and from the rest of romanians there most have atleast one rus/ukr relative down the line.

---

In Moldova about 80% of kids go to Romanian-medium schools. I really doubt Russians would send their kids to non-Russian schools. There was a mass outflow of Russians and Russian speakers from the newly independent republics after 1991. Hell, even a lot of ethnic Moldovans keep going to Russia for work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pribislav

Wrong.
I consider Romanians for very friendly nation towards the Serbs.

Modern Romania was created in 1859, so what? Have you ever heard for Ţara Românească?

Why Vlachs from eastern Serbia called themselves Rumani much before 1859?

---

Modern Romania is just Wallachia (Romania) who profited from terriotial losses of Moldova, and anexed this Principality. The people who made this was leftist subhumans, pro-Gypsy rights, who studied in French universities, from where they brought all this leftist degeneracy full of French Revolution ideas. This creation was made in blood, since in Moldova was a strong anti-Unionist movement, some Moldavians was killed by Wallachians and local Unionists. Today Moldavians from Romania are considered second class citizens, and Moldova is a periferic province without any investitions. We from RM was already part of Romania from 1918 to 1940, and Romanains traited us like properly subhumans, most of the elders who lived in that period, majority of them hate Romanians, and I understand why.

Vlachs from Eastern Serbia are bordering with Wallachia, this is the answer. In Wallachia "Rumun" was term for Serfs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pribislav

Tuđman was s Jew. Tito was of unknown origin.

---

Lmao Tuđman was not a Jew. Tito origin is well known, he was half Croat half Slovene like me, only difference his father was Croat and mother Slovenian.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El_Moldovano

Modern Romania is just Wallachia (Romania) who profited from terriotial losses of Moldova, and anexed this Principality. The people who made this was leftist subhumans, pro-Gypsy rights, who studied in French universities, from where they brought all this leftist degeneracy full of French Revolution ideas. This creation was made in blood, since in Moldova was a strong anti-Unionist movement, some Moldavians was killed by Wallachians and local Unionists. Today Moldavians from Romania are considered second class citizens, and Moldova is a periferic province without any investitions. We from RM was already part of Romania from 1918 to 1940, and Romanains traited us like properly subhumans, most of the elders who lived in that period, majority of them hate Romanians, and I understand why.

---

Moldova had no options 150 years ago. It was to become either a poor peripheral gubernia in the Russian empire or part of Romania.

There was some political opposition to the Union in Moldova, because Russia and Austro-Hungary financed it.
Of course Russia and Austro-Hungary were against the union, both had territories claimed by Romania.

Regular folk in Moldova were enthusiastic unionists, this is why the integration of the two countries worked flawlessly. Moldova was by no means the poor sister in the old Romania. This is a phenomenon of the last 30 years, where most investment was made either in Transylvania or in the capital. Today, except for the capital, Wallachia is just as poor as Moldova.

And btw, the harshness of the interwar Romanian rule is Soviet propagandistic nonsense. If Romanians were so harsh with the Moldovans, Moldovans would not have fled in the hundreds of thousands to Romania when the Soviets came in. Spare me of that bullshit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El_Moldovano

This creation was made in blood, since in Moldova was a strong anti-Unionist movement, some Moldavians was killed by Wallachians and local Unionists.

---

Same thing happened with Montenegro man, which was forcefully united with Serbia and occupied. Montenegrins consider themself Serbs and they are, but their country has very old tradition as indipendent realm and much of their elite was killed by pro-Serbian elements, as well as local Montenegrin dynasty Petrović was forced to abdicate after Montenegro was annexed by Serbia.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El_Moldovano

Modern Romania is just Wallachia (Romania) who profited from terriotial losses of Moldova, and anexed this Principality. The people who made this was leftist subhumans, pro-Gypsy rights, who studied in French universities, from where they brought all this leftist degeneracy full of French Revolution ideas. This creation was made in blood, since in Moldova was a strong anti-Unionist movement, some Moldavians was killed by Wallachians and local Unionists. Today Moldavians from Romania are considered second class citizens, and Moldova is a periferic province without any investitions. We from RM was already part of Romania from 1918 to 1940, and Romanains traited us like properly subhumans, most of the elders who lived in that period, majority of them hate Romanians, and I understand why.

Vlachs from Eastern Serbia are bordering with Wallachia, this is the answer. In Wallachia "Rumun" was term for Serfs.

---

Vlachs from eastern Serbian are settlers from Banat (around Timisoara) and Oltenia in period 1718-1739. They brought own original name Rumani 140 years before unification of Wallachia and Moldova in Romania.
Serbs call them Vlachs, and that does not exist on their language. Vlachs (Rumani) from eastern Serbia say for themselves on their language: "Eu sunt Rumân."