https://1.bp.blogspot.com/--VtOfiXc-...sCholetbis.jpg
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sRwJVTRvS...ryFrance2.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Mm0BJVzof...aryFrance.JPEG
Printable View
Seleucid + Sarmatian (11.94)
1. Cimmerian Odessa (900 BC) ..... 18.47 - cim358 -
Top99% match vs all users
3. Early Sarmatian Russia (300 BC) ..... 19.6 - I0247
Top99% match vs all users
6. Iron Age NW China (200 BC) ..... 20.86 - SRZ_M4
Top99% match vs all users
7. Hellenic Ottoman (1500 AD) ..... 21.34 - MA2196
Top99% match vs all users12. Iron Age Sarmatian (350 BC) ..... 22.58
Top99% match vs all users
14. Greco-Bactrian Tajikistan (50 BC) ..... 22.98 - I12293
Top99% match vs all users
15. Kushan Ksirov Tajikistan (20 BC) ..... 23.14 - I12294
Top99% match vs all users
17. Hunnic Tian Shan (475 AD) ..... 23.85 - DA65
Top99% match vs all users21. Hunnic Tien Shan (180 AD) ..... 24.27Top
99% match vs all users27. Iron Age Sarmatian (20 BC) ..... 25.47
Top99% match vs all users35. Turkic (768 AD) ..... 26.31
Top99% match vs all users48. Turkic (685 AD) ..... 27.43
Top99
% match vs all users51. Early Medieval Alan Caucasus (650 AD) ..... 27.59Top
98% match vs all users55. Kimak Turkic Tribe (800 AD) ..... 27.67Top
99% match vs all users
57. Eneolithic Steppes (4200 BC) ..... 27.91 - PG2004
Top99% match vs all users60. Cimmerian Moldova (900 BC) ..... 28.19
Top99% match vs all users
I have match with two of them new baguette boys, pretty far distance tho. :D
All the Gallic/Celtic element is completely gone for my mother :(
Did it happen to someone else?
You got one of the Kilteasheen samples (at a large distance but still one of them showed up). I did not get any of the Kilteasheen samples with any of my kits. The samples are from Roscommon which is were my father is from so I was surprised I did not get one of these samples in my list. I asked MTA about the sample and this was their reply.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gallop
The samples are from this paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-28091-9
The 3 samples we added are from a graveyard with bodies dating 600 to 1300 AD and have a closest link to modern Irish - but with some distance. They seem much closer to ancient samples which makes one suspect modern Irish have changed since. This could be due to Viking invasions or some other migrations. These samples were pulled as part of a control experiment of people over many centuries from the same graveyard making it tricky to pinpoint an exact date or background. There have been numerous digs in this area but they have focused on say black death victims. Hope this helps!
76. Medieval Ireland Kilteasheen (950 AD) ..... 17.48 - KT09Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley
mtDNA: K1a4a1
Celt + Frank (12.58)
Celt (12.92)
Viking Danish + Celt (13.06)
Frank (15.94)
Viking Danish (15.98)
Similar Samples
Celtic Briton Gladiator York (250 AD) (10.06)
Medieval Ireland Kilteasheen (950 AD) (11.3)
Scotland Late Bronze Age (900 BC) (11.31)
Celtic Briton Gladiator York (250 AD) (11.63)
Early Bronze Age Plymouth (1840 BC) (11.75)
Modern Group
1. South_Dutch (14.12)
2. French (15.36)
3. Southwest_English (15.44)
4. Southeast_English (15.76)
5. Southwest_French (16.56)
6. Spanish_Cantabria (16.86)
7. Irish (16.92)
8. Spanish_Cataluna (16.98)
In ftdna I got these matches:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TFNFv6__1...namatchdna.jpg
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0CZuT8JYL...hdnafamily.jpg
This is someone from Fermanagh is relatively close to where your father is and found the remains.
I also have a match with someone from Scotland I came to know that they are from U.S.A. and they are very rich people, but they have hidden data, which I don't understand because it hinders research for others.
Bell Beaker
More recent analyses of the "Beaker phenomenon", published since the 2000s, have persisted in describing the origin of the "Beaker phenomenon" as arising from a synthesis of elements, representing "an idea and style uniting different regions with different cultural traditions and background."Archaeogenetics studies of the 2010s have been able to resolve the "migrationist vs. diffusionist" question to some extent. The study by Olalde et al. (2017) found only "limited genetic affinity" between individuals associated with the Beaker complex in Iberia and in Central Europe, suggesting that migration played a limited role in its early spread. However, the same study found that the further dissemination of the mature Beaker complex was very strongly linked to migration. This is true especially for Britain, where the spread of the Beaker culture introduced high levels of steppe-related ancestry, resulting in a near-complete transformation of the local gene pool within a few centuries, to the point of replacement of about 90% of the local Mesolithic-derived lineages.
Migration vs. acculturation
Given the unusual form and fabric of Beaker pottery, and its abrupt appearance in the archaeological record, along with a characteristic group of other artefacts, known as the Bell Beaker "package", the explanation for the Beaker culture until the last decades of the 20th century was to interpret it as the migration of one group of people across Europe. However, British and American archaeology since the 1960s had been sceptical about prehistoric migration in general, so the idea of "Bell Beaker Folk" lost ground, although recent genetic findings lend renewed support to the migratory hypothesis. A theory of cultural contact de-emphasizing population movement was presented by Colin Burgess and Stephen Shennan in the mid-1970s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaker_culture
My results Bell Beaker and related.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZX058HvZ0...lospOLAND.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EZ3eVYnhp...losITALIA.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sZ9YFqS-z...KERcarlos.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kJVMbfId5...ceBOheMIA.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JtDUgR8aO...NDdenmark.JPEG
The Kilteasheen samples are bad quality I've heard from someone in the know. Will have to wait until the Cassidy paper to get some more Irish samples.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gallop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley
It is the question of old samples. Based on 100 examples, he knows that some enter and others leave, but those who leave are not seen on the list but remain. On other occasions he had already obtained results with the British Isles: Bell Beaker England, Bell Beaker Scotland, Saxon Settler Viking, Iceland Briton Gladiator are distances of 20, 23 and have been disappearing from the list as they entered other samples from which he obtained Closer results, we don't know what would happen if the samples were better. Actually when I started in all this I did not know what could come or expected anything, I imagine that as anyone, you really only hope to see what appears and then you learn.
How are people getting these updates? I refreshed mine like 2 times and none of the new added samples are listed.