Do you seriously think that the Caucasus component references don’t carry E. Eurasian ?? Here are the Caucasus component references from the Dodecad K12 spreadsheet
[FONT="]Dodecad K12 References [/FONT] |
|
[FONT="]Population[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Caucasus[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Georgians[/FONT] |
[FONT="]73.97[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Abhkasians[/FONT] |
[FONT="]70.00[/FONT] |
[FONT="]North_Ossetians[/FONT] |
[FONT="]56.70[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Balkars[/FONT] |
[FONT="]56.60[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Adygei[/FONT] |
[FONT="]56.54[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Chechens[/FONT] |
[FONT="]51.30[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Turkish[/FONT] |
[FONT="]46.40[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Kumyks[/FONT] |
[FONT="]46.30[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Turks[/FONT] |
[FONT="]46.25[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Lezgins[/FONT] |
[FONT="]45.60[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Iranian[/FONT] |
[FONT="]40.30[/FONT] |
[FONT="]Nogais[/FONT] |
37.23 |
Whatever E. Eurasian these references carry a sample scoring 50% Caucasus gets a 50% cut of their E. Eurasian.
Same thing for the Gedrosian component S. Asian references whether they’re Brahui, Pashtun or whatever . They all carry significant E./S. Eurasian. Any sample scoring 30% Gedrosian getss a 30% cut of their E./S. Eurasian
Same with the S. Indian references
You need to tally up all the E. Eurasians to get a total but you can be assured that it will end up being much more than 2-3%