the source is above, in short:
Meanwhile, Y-SNP and Y-STR profiles indicate that the males examined belonged to the R1b-M343 haplogroup
R1 family
Printable View
It is IE hg, not matter what race.
But at the beginning it was EHGean population, which was exclusivly R1.
Mal;ta has 50% of it, and 25% of other caucasoid types.
Logically, he was mixed, he was a castizo.
People here were laughing from me, when I suggested, that Africans could
loose 2-3% of neanderthal DNA. Do you want to say, that IEs loose 50%
of non EHGean DNA - as they were 100% EHG in Eastern Europe? Really? :scratch:
It is interesting, how "natural laws" works. When it supports evolution, then
the most bizzare and impossible thing can ahppen - but when it is against it,
then very simple and east things are not possible... interesting, isn't it?
100% european? And what? What does it mean?
European but black - do not play word games.
The word european is meaningless.
And these blue eyes, if they were, they were from IE admixture.
It will be proved in the future, you'll see.
You really need some psychoterapy in cabonet of someQuote:
EHG is less European than the WHG, because of mongoloid admixture.
Mongol becasue you have some problem with that issue.
And no, EHG was not mongoloidic, man... stop embarassing
yourself day by day... :picard2:
Sure... :picard2:Quote:
And the EHG guys were swarthy pigmented. I read about it today.
You could rwad about Karelian boy, who was amerindianic admixed,
some kind of castizo or even half castizo, I dont remember exactly.
He only witness that Amerindian people were crossing whole northern
Europe in their trek to Scandia, where they mostly live today in foreign skin.
http://www.anatole-klyosov.com/10_05_2017.pdf
page 1727-1728 + 1757