Originally Posted by
Upsilander
Yes but the average for Portugal passes the 75, i think in Europe only Sicily is short of something like 0.4%. These groups generally have documented and relatively recent North African or African maybe from slave trades, some more than others but it reflects in distances instantly. I doubt any Africans ended up somewhere around the place of your ancestors, so that's a different thing but the basal east Eurasian used to be closer to African.
Tianyuan in China was closer for example
Distance to: China_Tianyuan:Tianyuan__BC_37615
0.27506499 East_Asian
0.40158031 Amerindian_Native
0.61123540 Oceanian_Papuan
0.70820591 African_Nigerian
Iran meso and neo were the closest in West Eurasia and that's not directly African ancestry, but highly basal stuff. I dont know exactly how you can be modeled, do you get some in ancient calculator?
Distance to: IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
0.59038204 East_Asian
0.59432458 Amerindian_Native
0.72551252 African_Nigerian
0.78285358 Oceanian_Papuan