And then this:Quote:
Originally Posted by Arhat
Yeah sure, you are not racist, you're such a peace bird and don't have any hatred towards Turks :laugh: Just fuck off and turn back to your shithole butthurt, you are getting annoying. You are too dumb to be taken serious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arhat
Your people are half incest goats so you don't count as human. Get a life and accept what you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ölüezgi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arhat
fucking swarthy scum dare to talk North Euroasian Türks like this?i dont know what ancestry you have but i am sure you are below Türks in racial reality cos if you are a slav or germanic then you aren a oval faced,snub nosed baltoid,borreby üntermensch,if you are a sandnigger from iran,mena etc...well you are even below these germanics and slavs
Lol my Niggro-Semite friend you look like a gypsy and I expect that you are genetically a mix of Goats/Africans/Semites and neolithic farmer slaves. This is a European forum and not a gypsy or Anatolian goat-fucker forum of some wannabe Aryans. You are by the far the ugliest people in Eurasia and not even Mongols. You were just their prostitutes and bitches with a Stockholm syndrom. Get out of this European forum. Make a DNA test Neolithic Basal Eurasian farmer gypsy and tell me to which Neolithic/Mesolithic African tribe you belong. I am not racist actually but your people are basically half incest goats so they don't count as humans anyway. Nobody really wants to hear pan-turanian bullshit about Sumerian- Scythian-Mongols of people being actually neither real Aryans or Turks/Mongols.Quote:
Originally Posted by archangel
Hello my Kurdish friend. Look what the race mixing with Iranics has caused to us... we got downright genetically fucked up... This is not funny at all!Quote:
Originally Posted by Arhat
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/att...0&d=1440966473
Lol. Is this lil cocksucker related with dat Kurdish troll fuck Demhat?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan
Retard I am not Kurdish:picard2: . Stop spamming this forum with Bullshit." Bla Bla we are not Arabs. We are so pure "white" Mongol Scytho-Sumerians" .Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan
I hate to repeat it: This is a "European" forum so what the fuck are descendants of Anatolian gypsies/goats/Semites doing here???Quote:
Originally Posted by Ölüezgi
lol every member of ""European"" (whatever this is) aristocracy has actually Cuman blood in their veins xDQuote:
Originally Posted by Arhat
I don't know how many Kurdish members are active in this forum, but I am sure they have too many sockpuppets.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ölüezgi
Are you retarded?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan
Having problem with facts. Not my problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arhat
So who invaded India? Ancient Turks?
Yes, they do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Toppo900
Lol very turkic
qpAdm mixture model
Scythian_IA
Potapovka 0.913
Nganasan 0.087
chisq 5.815 tail prob 0.213365
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/mz...=w1920-h853-rw
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Duke
They don't to me - at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan
this thread filled with cancer
Your link has an error. Can you explain a lil bit more plz?Quote:
Originally Posted by Babak
which linkQuote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan
thisQuote:
Originally Posted by Babak
oh shit idk what happened lol sorryQuote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan
It's unlikely to be Ukranian origin, Shevchen means priest in Circassian an ko means son. It's more meaningful than shoemaker.Quote:
Originally Posted by KawaiiKawaii
Do you have proof of what you post or you are just keeping up the Turkish tradition of making claims out of your arse?Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarian of the Age
Sarmatians/Scythian were large group like the Huns. The Huns had multiple language skill because of mercs or something.
Maybe Sarmatians and Scythians were Iranic speaking or multiple languages, but due to location and movement were more light skinned.
Is it not possible that after Huns/Mongols/Turks invaded they got some input from Scythians/Slavs/etc, explaining the z93?
Map of Indo Europeans 500bc
https://s33.postimg.cc/rsbcmra8f/Ind...0_BC_-_map.jpg
EtymologyQuote:
Originally Posted by Petros Houhoulis
So, you made it out of your arse, you cannot provide a link...Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarian of the Age
:lol00002:Quote:
Originally Posted by Petros Houhoulis
He is Circassian
No, there is no evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoon
Circassians were present at Southern Ukraine and Volga area before Mongol invaisons and some etymological link seems overlapping. I am not decisive but why wouldn't, since Circassians has huge cultural impact on Ukranian speaking Cossaks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Petros Houhoulis
If Turuksha is the Sanskrit word for Turks, then Kushan are Turkic or what? because this would be the logical consequence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vishwamitra
Original Turkic people were a mix of Q, C and N haplogroups.
Ket language ( Q haplogroup) related to Na-Dene Native American group sounds just like Turkic language.
Very strong explosive guttural sound K in these three languages.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCnWPOHc0YY&t
Compare Ket with Kazakh language
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k9rVnKnzW0
Inuit language of Canada resembles Turkic language in sound and grammatical structure is similar ( agglutinative).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0lrGBaawsk
No,Y DNA C is not a component of proto bulgaro turkics but N and Q are more likely to be so.Quote:
. Original Turkic people were a mix of Q, C and N haplogroups.
Ket language ( Q haplogroup) related to Na-Dene Native American group sounds just like Turkic language.
Very strong explosive guttural sound K in these three languages.
It has nothing to do with the na-dene natives and the Kets(and other yeniseic peoples).Na dene natives are a people of neo mongoloid carrying Y DNA C and split from other Eastern Asians 15-10.000 years ago.The natives of Yenisey carry Y DNA Q and they are a paleo Amerind people .They formed 30.000 years ago with the East Asian and ANE mixture.
Ket language has no relation to Turkic languages.The Ket language contains excessive consonants and consonant clustures and contains toned sounds.Turkic languages are poor in terms of consonant and clustures and do not contain any tone.
I've explained this before.
Quote:
proto Bulgaro turkic language did not contain laryngeal,uvular or harsh sounds,instead it contains dental, palatal,velar and labial consonants.
there are significant differences between Turkic languages and paleo Siberian languages.
1-)Turkic languages have rich vovels,but there is not much in PS languages.
2-)Turkic languages have not as consonants as PS languages.
3-)while Turkish languages are nominativ languages,PS languages are more ergative.
4-)Turkic languages are agglutinativ,PS languages are polysentetic
Turkic consonants: labial(p,b,m) dental(t,d,s,n,l,r),palatal(č,S,s,ñ,N,R,L),velar(k ,g,q,G)
Turkic vovels:a,aa,e,ee,i,ii,ï,ïï,o,oo,ö,öö,u,uu,ü,üü,é,é é,perhaps ä,ää
Mongolian and Tungusic languages ( haplogroup C3) have similar grammatical structure as Turkic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryuk
In the same manner Yakut people ( a mix of Tungusic and Turkic peoples) have common haplogroup N with Uralic Finno-Ugric speakers. And grammar of Uralic languages is also similar to Tungusic and Turkic.
There is also a link of haplogroup C origin with Dravidian languages which are also agglutinative in structure. Haplogroup C presumably originated from India because they found its highest variety in India. So I presume that carriers of haplogroup C spoke agglutinative language.
I think that carriers of Haplogroup N spoke a language which nowadays is closer to Samoyedic language. The problem with Yakuts is that possibly they are Turkified Tungusic speakers.
Samoyedic language
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0n3kl2cJT4
Also uralic,most amerindian languages,dravidian,hurro-urartian,caucasian,aboriginal languages etc. so?Quote:
Mongolian and Tungusic languages ( haplogroup C3) have similar grammatical structure as Turkic.
Kushans were Bactrian (East Iranic).Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan
Uralic - Tungusic ( common haplogroup N)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryuk
Amerindian - Altaic ( common place of origin, haplogroups Q, C)
Dravidian - haplogroup C formed in South India - Aboriginal Australians carry haplogroup C
What sticks out is Hurro-Urartian and Caucasian languages. What I noticed is that Northern Caucasian languages like Chechen have stops/intervals like in Amerindian and some Siberian populations.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped..._East_Asia.png
Where do you think O formed? Its concentration is in the eastern half of Asia, but I've even seen Pashtuns and Jatts with O in some rare cases.Quote:
Originally Posted by mutabor
I don't think so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mingle
But why were they called Turushka then?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vishwamitra