I know the difference, but now silent is golden. Look at my message:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post6489951
Printable View
I know the difference, but now silent is golden. Look at my message:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post6489951
Where is all the Iberian gone?
Gaul + Saxon (3.983)
Viking Danish + Gaul (4.662)
Gaul + Frank (5.884)
Viking Danish + Frank (6.062)
Visigoth + Frank (6.206)
Frank (7.651)
Visigoth (8.633)
Gaul (10.18)
Saxon (10.59)
Viking Danish (11.49)
Gallo-Roman + Illyrian (5.991)
Iberian + Illyrian (5.994)
Visigoth + Illyrian (6.582)
Iberian + Gallo-Roman (6.952)
Etruscan + Illyrian (7.765)
Visigoth (8.765)
Gallo-Roman (9.032)
Etruscan (10.31)
Illyrian (10.75)
Iberian (12.19)
Has anyone see Thuringii, Proto-Hungarians, Oeselians, or Rugii as anyone's top population? These seem like the oddball ones.
Lol MTA is able to differentiate Rugii genome? On what basis. Is there any skeleton tested, described by archeologists as Rugii warrior? Please tell me which one:)Quote:
Has anyone see Thuringii, Proto-Hungarians, Oeselians, or Rugii as anyone's top population? These seem like the oddball ones.
Also Thuringii:)