Absolutely no.
Printable View
Absolutely no.
If WA its european because its "caucasoid" so NA is european too.
Aren't modern day Europeans basically near eastern Finnic hybrids???
I believe Europeans all plot in between those two population??
Sent from my moto g power (2021) using Tapatalk
No...Uralic speakers did not arrive into Europe until the Iron Age...maybe some initial smaller movements during the LBA. the narrative that Finno-Ugric represents an ancient-most linguistic group in Europe is a genetic old wives’ tale.Quote:
Originally Posted by strike978
Depends if you see Yamnaya as indigenous
Yamnaya I0443 / 3300-2700 BC
North_Atlantic 25.99 Pct
Baltic 38.52 Pct
West_Med -
West_Asian 28.05 Pct
East_Med -
Red_Sea -
South_Asian 3.43 Pct
East_Asian -
Siberian -
Amerindian 4.01 Pct
Oceanian -
Northeast_African -
Sub-Saharan -
It's like some models with formed IEs in G25, they just forget to tell you there s plenty of "farmer" type of dna embedded in it, in the form of CHG/Iran_N (which is even more basal than actual farmers). Here it manifests in West Asian mostly, because that's a more modern component.
I'd say it isn't.
West Asian/east med/west med are all European components
So you must include East Asian and North African (NA is caucasoid) as "European".Quote:
West Asian/east med/west med are all European components
Everything that Europeans obtain for Europeans during the formation of Europe and in important historical events and that Europeans have integrated for Europeans is so, if in other continents they do not agree we do not care, Europe is decided by Europeans, whether there are differences of opinion among Europeans is not relevant either, since no European territory has the exclusivity of Europe as a continent.
West Asian is what gives Europeans a sallow complexion, big round eyes and a lot of body hair.
It's literally worse than the bubbonic plague.