Admin in r1a project on FTDNA give me probable subclad of R-M198 (which is predicted on 37 markers) = Z282 > PF6155 > M458 > PF7521 > L260> YP1337-x3.
Printable View
Admin in r1a project on FTDNA give me probable subclad of R-M198 (which is predicted on 37 markers) = Z282 > PF6155 > M458 > PF7521 > L260> YP1337-x3.
Miast na horror iść do kina wczuj się w rolę Słowianina! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by physical-anthro
BTW na drzewku mam wiersz wyzej jakiegos Rethelitę:) To ty?
Nie, ale ja go testowałem :)Quote:
Originally Posted by physical-anthro
Może też jesteś z mojej wsi :p
R1a (FTDNA) gdzie Michał Milewski jest adminem.
Juz znalazłek.Quote:
Originally Posted by physical-anthro
Tak, tylko skasuj nazwisko teraz u siebie w poście. Nie chce tu podawać:)
A tyś moje podał, też skasuj :pQuote:
Originally Posted by physical-anthro
Widzę, że bardzo blisko jesteśta.
Na 12 tylko jedna różnica, dalej troszkę dużo, ale
chyba się jeszcze w średniowieczu załapieta :)
Ok już zedytowane:) Ten twój krewniak spod Łomży tak? Tak jak ty chyba?
U mnie w rodzinie niby pochodzimy z okolic Sieradza w linii ojca (mapa nazwusk wskazuje że to centrum), więc to raczej sprzed kilku wieków co najmniej migracja.
No niby tak, ale to w tym stuleciu. A jak wszedł w posiadanieQuote:
Originally Posted by physical-anthro
nazwiska, nie wiadomo. Wszystkie opcje są możliwe, włącznie
z zamieszkiwaniem we wsi, chociaż na pewno część -ewskich
jest nami, pytanie tylko jak duża część...
A tam się znowu pałętają jacyś -ewscy pisaniQuote:
Originally Posted by physical-anthro
przez e zamiast y, co najmniej od drugiej połowy
XVIII wieku, może ten mój jest stamtąd, albo tamci
od niego? Trzebaby było jakiegoś testnąć...
Trzeba będzie.
R1b :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8PFtt1P3TUQuote:
Originally Posted by Stears
what cladeQuote:
Originally Posted by Stears
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rethel of Retheley
Hello Indian Gypo! Unlike R1a, R1b is not proto-Indo-European marker. Never forget it.
So what it is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stears
R1b-Z381>Z301, I only close match other Hungarians.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dema
It is Western European marker, so real European haplogroup, unlike your IE R1a Eurasian marker, deal with it! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rethel of Retheley
Do you feel closer to R1thel now? Btw congratsQuote:
Originally Posted by Stears
:laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dema
No. Rethel is a stupid Russian untermensch boy, who think he is a German.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dema
https://i.makeagif.com/media/4-19-2014/h1Fn97.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Stears
btw, you are quickly changing your mind, a couple of minutes ago, you claimed something totally opposite. :picard2:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stears
Why rootless people, who bearly even know their grandpa,Quote:
Originally Posted by Stears
are always feeling the power to judge those, who know? :icon_ask:
Wrong. Unlike you, I have no foreign ancestry in my family tree. You may be product of some Soviet soldier, who raped women in Central-Eastern Europe after WW2.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rethel of Retheley
1. You probably do not have any family tree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stears
2. You have foreign haplotype, as you said, western European.
3. Please, do not create facts, which are not true about me.
In Hungary were no rapes... yea... :laugh:Quote:
You may be product of some Soviet soldier, who raped women in Central-Eastern Europe after WW2.
Probably more, than in Poland, becasue you was on the Hitler side.
p.s. now Hungary is not in central Europe, or you were talking about yourself? :laugh:
Wrong. I am not proletarian like you, so I know my ancestry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rethel of Retheley
''2. You have foreign haplotype, as you said, western European.''
Wrong. It is common in Western Europe, but not foreign to Hungary. I only close match Hungarians not foreigners. Hungarian Conquerors also had R1b, ignorant Russian.
''In Hungary were no rapes... yea... :laugh:
Probably more, than in Poland, becasue you was on the Hitler side.''
You are not a Pole, but a Russian descendant with weird look who hate Hungarians.
Yea, sure...Quote:
Originally Posted by Stears
If you are not proletarian, why do
you behave worst than typical pleb?
Still foreign - not hungarian, not ugrofinian, not uralian at all.Quote:
Wrong. It is common in Western Europe, but not foreign to Hungary. I only close match Hungarians not foreigners. Hungarian Conquerors also had R1b, ignorant Russian.
More than that - very pre-hungarian and local, Indoeuropean-local, Panonian.
Ergo - you allowed yourself to be subjugated by Hungolian savages from the jewish khaganate :laugh:
It is very enlighting... :picard1:Quote:
You are not a Pole, but a Russian descendant with weird look who hate Hungarians.
I am R-L48. :3
:thumb001:Quote:
Originally Posted by de Burgh II
Idiot. Your fantasy has absolutely no scientific background. Ration of N1c is 0.5% in Hungary, you can find more of such Siberian haplogroup among ethnic Romanians, Serbs and Slovaks, Poles, than us. Deal with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rethel of Retheley
Since you are Russian, ratio of N1c is really big among your people.
What's this? No G1?
http://i64.tinypic.com/vmzxaw.jpg
So vote for G unity :pQuote:
Originally Posted by jingorex
not E1b
How can you know it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Thevillager
dude.i tested.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rethel of Retheley
So, normal people, when they are tested, they write what hgQuote:
Originally Posted by Thevillager
they are - not what they are not, especially, the one from many.
well, consider me an abnormalQuote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rethel of Retheley
E1b1b1 (M35), very basic and needs further testing, as for now, it can be from anywhere.