DNA test results of Chris596

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Universe

Chris,

Do you have Serb/South Slavic surnames in your family?

---

I really don't know about it. All my family members had regular Hungarian surnames like Turi, Kovács, etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Impaler

I have 4.21% EE. NE_Asia + Siberian + Oceania.

---

What is EE?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris596

I really don't know about it. All my family members had regular Hungarian surnames like Turi, Kovács, etc.

---

Kovács can be south Slavic as well as Hungarian surname

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.G

Well one thing to keep in mind, the phenotypes are ancient and were spread and absorbed long ago through migration, so they would not necessarily align strictly with recent ancestry. Also, Chris' asiatic traits can fit within the Eastern and Southeastern European range of looks without needing exotic validation. In other words, his looks could be a recapitulation of ancestors from hundreds of years ago or more who's DNA is absorbed and recombined in broken bits.

---

I know but my point is that you can't judge someone by his look. By his results he could be South Slav but he doesn't look like one. If I had to guess (based on his appereance) I would guess him as 1/4 or at least 1/8 east asian.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris596

I really don't know about it. All my family members had regular Hungarian surnames like Turi, Kovács, etc.

---

You can run this one also with MH raw data: https://cladefinder.yseq.net/

It gave me more specific clade than Morley´s predictor.

Edit: Not related with the text of your post, simply it was your last post...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Universe

How did you make that estimation? Life span was that low in 19th century? My grandfather(rip) was born in 1923, almost 100 years ago and (obviously) I have 1/4 of my genes from him.

---

Let's say that average interval of each 'generation' in that person's case is 25 years.

Let black person be born in 1800 and has a child with a white person in 1825. That child would be 50% black. His descendant in 1850 would be born and would be 25% black. In 1875 would be 12.5%. In 1900 would be 6.25%. In 1925 would be 3.125%. In 1950 would be 1.5625% black. In 1975 the parent of the person Ford mentioned would be born and would be 0.78125% black. In 2000 that person would be born and would be 0.39% black or 1/256.

Maybe I missed something idk.

We don't know many things. Maybe the person in question Ford mentioned is in his or hers 80s and not 20s, maybe the average interval in his or hers case is not 25 years, but 35 years. Maybe it is even lower than 25 years, we can't know. Maybe years in question are actually 180 years and not 200, but yes that person could be 3% or even more black, but could be below 1%. The point is also that genes could be 'washed' away pretty quickly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ford

Probably because the autosomal influence has been "washed out" but the genetic variants related to your apperance are still passed on. I know a Scot who has nappy hair like an African, yet his Black ancestor lived like 200 years ago. He would probably score 3% SSA tops if he tested.

---

+1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Universe

What is EE?

---

Eastern Eurasia.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gixajo

You can run this one also with MH raw data: https://cladefinder.yseq.net/

It gave me more specific clade than Morley´s predictor.

Edit: Not related with the text of your post, simply it was your last post...

---

It says:

Most specific position on the YFull YTree is E-V13 Link to E-V13

E1b-V13 Panel Predicted E-V13 is the panel root. This panel is applicable and will definitely provide higher resolution.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Insuperable

Let's say that average interval of each 'generation' in that person's case is 25 years.

Let black person be born in 1800 and has a child with a white person in 1825. That child would be 50% black. His descendant in 1850 would be born and would be 25% black. In 1875 would be 12.5%. In 1900 would be 6.25%. In 1925 would be 3.125%. In 1950 would be 1.5625% black. In 1975 the parent of the person Ford mentioned would be born and would be 0.78125% black. In 2000 that person would be born and would be 0.39% black or 1/256.

Maybe I missed something idk.

We don't know many things. Maybe the person in question Ford mentioned is in his or hers 80s and not 20s, maybe the average interval in his or hers case is not 25 years, but 35 years. Maybe it is even lower than 25 years, we can't know. Maybe years in question are actually 180 years and not 200, but yes that person could be 3% or even more black, but could be below 1%. The point is also that genes could be 'washed' away pretty quickly.

---

But only if every "mixture" are only made with 0% Black people.

In my maternal family,seeing the last 4 centuries, the average is 3 generations per century not 4. But is a particular case.