Byzantine + Gaul (9.305)
Byzantine + Roman (10.18)
Seleucid + Gaul (10.69)
Seleucid + Roman (11.99)
Roman + Ottoman (12.44)
Roman (15.3)
Seleucid (16.62)
Ottoman (17.43)
Byzantine (17.58)
Gaul (17.8)
Printable View
Byzantine + Gaul (9.305)
Byzantine + Roman (10.18)
Seleucid + Gaul (10.69)
Seleucid + Roman (11.99)
Roman + Ottoman (12.44)
Roman (15.3)
Seleucid (16.62)
Ottoman (17.43)
Byzantine (17.58)
Gaul (17.8)
Sarmatian + Kievan Rus (9.268)
Scythian + Sarmatian (11.25)
Sarmatian + Hungarian Conqueror (12.12)
Sarmatian + Avar (13.63)
Scythian + Kievan Rus (13.79)
Sarmatian (14.97)
Scythian (16.91)
Kievan Rus (18.1)
Hungarian Conqueror (20.0)
1. Tatar (12.52)
2. East_Finnish (13.86)
3. Kargopol_Russian (14.37)
4. Erzya (14.72)
5. Ukrainian (17.10)
6. Finnish (17.30)
7. Ukrainian_Lviv (17.47)
8. Moldavian (17.91)
Byzantine + Roman (6.454)
Byzantine + Gallo-Roman (6.803)
Byzantine + Gaul (7.319)
Byzantine + Hellenic Roman (11.14)
Gaul + Hellenic Roman (11.84)
Roman (12.16)
Byzantine (15.2)
Gaul (18.13)
Hellenic Roman (18.42)
Gallo-Roman (18.61)
Viking + Longobard (4.734)
Viking + Scythian (8.055)
Viking + Ostrogoth (8.937)
Viking (8.967)
Scythian + Longobard (9.298)
Viking Icelandic + Scythian (10.24)
Ostrogoth (13.33)
Scythian (14.08)
Longobard (14.56)
Viking Icelandic (15.41)
Ancient. PCA
This is what my Asia map looks like now. Southeast Asia. I get results from there in almost any calculator. Even G25 assigns some Indonesian and Indochinese to me. Also to my father (and he gets Thai and Cambodian for example in many calculators).
But how is this possible? Did some of the Turkic tribes who settled in East Europe in the past, actually have some Southeast Asian-like ancestry? What about Turkish people? Are there other Hungarians who get Southeast Asian on Vahaduo, GEDmatch or in any other commercial DNA test report?
FTDNA did say I have some Southeast Asian ancestry, although that is a conservative estimate. I also match a sample found in the Philippines but Dr. Maul said that's an ancient Mongolic sample.
Any thoughts on this?
https://i.imgur.com/NRtVYEY.jpg
Double
Closest Ancient Populations:
AncestryDNA kit:
- Belgae + Frank (2.338)
- Celt + Frank (2.79)
- Viking Danish + Frank (3.603)
- Celt + Belgae (3.898)
- Saxon + Frank (3.955)
- Frank (6.485)
- Belgae (6.633)
- Celt (7.513)
- Viking Danish (8.007)
- Saxon (10.25)
23andMe kit:
- Belgae + Frank (2.765)
- Celt + Frank (3.341)
- Belgae + Saxon (3.696)
- Viking Danish + Belgae (3.703)
- Saxon + Frank (4.103)
- Celt (6.744)
- Frank (7.148)
- Belgae (7.766)
- Viking Danish (8.619)
- Saxon (9.473)
Ancient Populations Averages (calculated by finding the averages of the differences between my AncestryDNA and 23andMe kits. It doesn't add up to 100%, but it does round up to 100%, so...):
Celts 35%
Danish Vikings 14.45%
Franks 14.05%
Saxons 11.55%
Belgae 10.17%
Vikings (Swedish) 2.735%
Vandals 2.33%
Ostrogoths 2.21%
Visigoths 2.035%
Vikings (Icelandic) 1.345%
Thuringii 0.98%
Gauls 0.965%
Scythians 0.865%
Longobards 0.635%
Illyrians 0.155%
Vascones 0.155%
Gallo-Romans 0.09%
Matching Sample Locations
- Czechia
- Denmark
- England
- France
- Germany
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Moldova
- The Netherlands
- North America
- Poland
- Scotland
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Ukraine
interesting. I have seen such resultsQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris596