What kind of site is this?there's no home page.. also is there any of filtering of your matches after you upload the data?
Printable View
No, I can add more features later. It is all done in Javascript so there's actually no upload. The relatives .csv file can be downloaded from this link: https://you.23andme.com/tools/relatives/download/
Their modern population count is irrelevant ,why mention it? in 1600 albania area had a population of 200k (and not all "albanians" obviously) ,just one century later they were 300k..go burther back ,think about the clan culture and you can understand how they became "homogeneous" or how founder effects could take place.
I agree that we must be objective but there's nothing objective/that has been settled about Arvanites(+Vlachs too) or the origin of albanian language/when it came yet..things could be more complicated than a g25 calculator..I wouldn't like to discuss this further though , just let time show.
What source has Arvanites at 250k though?
Haha now it`s just funny. Modern inflated numbers when talking about Middle Ages. Also omitting the fact that Arvanites lived only in certain areas and many of them left for Italy. Anyone with complete knowledge knows Albanians boomed demographically from an extremely small population. Meanwhile anthropologists have long noted that Tosks look much more "Med" than Ghegs :cool: Certainly Albanians in Greece can be spotted from across the street. Ridiculous :picard2:
This is quite strange. You lack any East Asian/Siberian contribution, usually for Turks it's between 5-15%, can go up to 22% depending on the person, yet you score close to Turks and even to Azeris.
I'm assuming this is because of noticeable European contribution combined with East Mediterranean heritage. Compared to Armenians/Anatolian-Greeks, Turks score higher European due to Yamnaya heritage. You might not be fully Pontian though since your results are wildly different from others.
The European admixture can't be described with Greek heritage since Greeks themselves are around 30% at best. A fully Pontic person having 20% doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The average there is literally 1%
Funny thing is just yesterday I sorted ydna(+mt) of my matches ,browsed them one by one..wondered If there's some tool but didn't bother to search.
Anyways out of almost 1400 matches only around -/+ 10% were relevant to use for both (Greek side from mixed people included)...
N=130
E-v13 23,8%
I2 15,38%
R1b 13,85%
J2 3,84%
J2a 10%
R1a 7,69%
Other E-clades 5,38%
J2b 5,38%
G 4,61%
Ι1 3,84%
J1 2,30%
T 2,30%
L-L595 0,79%
N-M178 0,79%
I could break them apart to subclades but I guess it's meaningless for such size.
So then how do you explain the high IBD sharing that Greeks have with Poles and Ukrainians?
https://i.imgur.com/tlLVmNo.png
The graph above was made by a Greek person (Dienekes).