The key to this is the distribution among the people along the Irtisch River, and between Amudaria and Surdaria rivers
Printable View
The key to this is the distribution among the people along the Irtisch River, and between Amudaria and Surdaria rivers
There would had to have been a significant amount of Eskimos or American Indian slaves to account for 4% Q in Norway. As of 2010 there are only 50,000 Greenland Inuits and many of them are part Danish in the paternal line. There could have not been enough Eskinos in medieval Greenland to account for 4% Q in Norway. Though they could be responsible for some of the Q. I think Q in Norway must be the mainly the remnants of an ancient people who wandered, or were pushed, to the end of northwestern Europe.
off-topic, but What is the majority haplogroup in Scandinavia?
When I see a pattern of haplogroups scattered all around , unlinked geographically to each other and where you can't trace a cline (like it works for the R1a instead...) so that you cannot say where it has originated and the direction along wich it moves , I'm brought to think that that haplo was previously widespred all over and then , very likely due to invanders , only a few small pockets of it survived here and there...
The pockets in Norway could be the last Q remnants of an ancient Siberian (Mongol) people who survived to the IndoEuropeans/Aryan from south , thanks to mountanous refuges.
Thanks! :)
To the thread topic, Scandinavia had trading cities in the Middle Ages that attracted foreign merchant types and slaves. Maybe some merchants with Q spread it around..
According to this other study (Dupuy et al. 2005) there is no 4% of Q, but less than 1% :
http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/5773/r1bnorway.png
I have already seen that table, here is what PJ said about it:
https://www.forumbiodiversity.com/sh...64&postcount=6
https://www.forumbiodiversity.com/sh...48&postcount=3