Do they differ a lot from modern day Egyptians?
Printable View
Do they differ a lot from modern day Egyptians?
Admix Results (sorted):Quote:
Originally Posted by Wadaad
# Population Percent
1 Near_East 42.95
2 Atlantic_Mediterranean_Neolithic 34.77
3 West-Asian 20.64
4 Sub-Saharian 0.95
5 Arctic-Amerind 0.68
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Jew_Libya (derived) 10.16
2 Jew_Tunisia (derived) 11.91
3 Samaritian (derived) 13.81
4 Jew_Algeria (derived) 14.19
5 Jew_Morocco (derived) 14.24
6 Palestinian (derived) 14.97
7 Sephardim (derived) 15.17
8 Jew_Syria (derived) 16.49
9 Jew_Italia (derived) 16.89
10 Jew_Francestrale (derived) 17.54
11 Cypriot (derived) 18.15
12 Jordanian (derived) 19.17
13 Lebanese (derived) 19.83
14 Druze (derived) 19.84
15 Ashkenazim (derived) 20.67
16 Syrian (derived) 21.47
17 Egyptian (derived) 21.76
18 Greek_Cretan (derived) 23.65
19 Sicilian (derived) 24.55
20 Jew_Georgia (derived) 24.64
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 74.4% Jew_Yemen (derived) + 25.6% Atlantic_Mediterranean_Neolithic (ancestral) @ 4.29
2 71.9% Samaritian (derived) + 28.1% Otzi (derived) @ 4.53
3 71.7% Saudi (derived) + 28.3% Atlantic_Mediterranean_Neolithic (ancestral) @ 5.82
4 83.2% Jew_Algeria (derived) + 16.8% Near_East (ancestral) @ 6.15
5 88.7% Jew_Libya (derived) + 11.3% Near_East (ancestral) @ 6.19
I am not sure, but I think its the absent of SSA that makes the difference.
ahhh love how every 2 days they open a thread about the Egyptians and their ethnic group.
Well I blame the Egyptian antiquities for having some biased European team to select the mummies. And its funny how even in that STUDY, the authors save themselves by stating tests from other sites and other mummies might give different results. I wonder if an archaelogical group from Howard University or some other HCBU came to Zahi Hawass or his colleagues, they would be so willing to let them do their research?Quote:
Originally Posted by Egyptian
zahi hawas is a joke.. European teams aren't qualified to do any research here , they lack knowledge or basic understanding of the egyptian history or both Arabic and old egyptian language , they need translator with them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wadaad
zahi or ministry of antiques used to hire them just because of tourism (to bring more money to the country and probably use their modern equipments).
Just accept it nigga, u wuzn't kangz n' sheeit. Anchun Egypshunz share as much DNA with your people as they do with Croats.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wadaad
Dont cum and use it as hairgel just yet my frizzy haired homeboy...this is just the latest study and I already determined the biases which you have failed to address.Quote:
Originally Posted by RN97
You'd be surprised at how many jiggaboos have given me a similar response on youtube and stuff....Quote:
Originally Posted by Wadaad
Don't be exited just yet! Why dawg? I have my genetic results and you'd be like twice as close to the egypshuns than I'd be. I don't give a fuck m8, but I'm being realistic. You know there are Europeans that claim genetic continuity from PIE and no change at all, that's just not realistic. However there is a connection there at least.... I guess you can claim the basal Eurasian connection with Egyptians, but why not with the modern ones more so? Anyways your argument is weak. Let's say they find this ancient Egyptian with 35% SSA. you still lose as they found these with less than modern ones, so what does it change? It only proves that ancient Egyptians varied, but on average they were still predominantly not SSA.
Egypt was multi-racial as even Biblical narratives testify, unless biblical authors imagined Moses (a non-Egyptian raised in Egypt) betrothal to a Ethiopian woman.Quote:
Originally Posted by RN97
If Toronto was to get tested...and the site used for the test is the Dixon rd Cemetery, people would assume this city was predominately inhabited by Somalis. Soon with some creative writing alot could be postulated just on that.
That doesn't sound to realistic. Horners are suposed to be almost like half-Arab/semitic , and if ancient Egyptians were Levantine like they are expected to be closer to them, no?Quote:
Originally Posted by RN97
I'm bit consfuesd about these results.