Pure Caucasoid is a " Myth ". Turks, North Africans are less Caucasoid than South Asians.

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-13-2017, 01:15 PM
ButlerKing

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hudayar

When i google searched this http://i63.tinypic.com/23m3cqx.jpg i found nothing

did you make the picture

I downloaded the files many years ago. It was from a Russian forum, you'll have to log in. You won't be able to find it because I copy and pasted it on tinypic.
10-13-2017, 01:15 PM
Vlatko Vukovic

Quote:

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

A lot of Idiots keep claiming South Asians are not Caucasoid. Firstable South Asians are a mix of West Eurasian + ASI components. Firstable the first Caucasoid properly didn't exist in Europe.

1) The ASI component in South Asians is not necessarily Australoid, many claims it's a proto-Caucasoid. Also ASI it's closer to West Eurasian than to East Asian and Sub-Saharan DNA.

2) ASI which is predominant in South India are all anthropologically different from the Australoid Negrito and Australian aborigines that resemble Africans not to mention Australoid have many different variations not just a African-look alike type but others like Caucasoid.

Where is your pure Caucasoid genetically. There is none, if if they are 99.98% West Eurasian genetically it doesn't make you pure. So what's a pure Caucasoid?

Caucasoid is a anthropologically type not a genetic type.

GENETICALLY ? use your brain before you keep talking shit.

There is no such thing as pure Caucasoid genetically only anthropologically. And anthropologically South Asians are pure Caucasoids like Europeans, Middle easterners.

http://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/...ps0843aaba.jpg

Please use your brain before you make wrong judgments

North Africans are CAUCASOID anthropologically but they are genetically admixtures of mix of West Eurasian and SSA ( Black African / Sub-Saharan) which is Negroid type

Central Asian/Turks are CAUCASOID anthropologically but they are genetically mix of West Eurasian and East Eurasian ( East Asian / Siberian ) which is Mongoloid type

North African DNA

https://histoireislamique.files.word...pg?w=740&h=439

Central Asian Turk DNA
http://i63.tinypic.com/23m3cqx.jpg

East Asian DNA distribution

http://i1142.photobucket.com/albums/...4.gif~original

African DNA distribution
http://oi50.tinypic.com/23j0g74.jpg

West Europe don't have same pigmentation as Nordic. Sorry but you don't have much blond hair and eyes.
Specially France. Your look is not guy from 1st photo!
10-13-2017, 01:29 PM
ButlerKing

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlatko Vukovic

West Europe don't have same pigmentation as Nordic. Sorry but you don't have much blond hair and eyes.
Specially France. Your look is not guy from 1st photo!

Pigmentation is a adaptation not a genetic. There are many Mongoloids and Oceana Solomon islander with blonde hair ? so what. It is the skeletal traits that matters not hair/eye color which hare superficial traits.
10-13-2017, 01:33 PM
Vlatko Vukovic

Quote:

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Pigmentation is a adaptation not a genetic. There are many Mongoloids and Oceana Solomon islander with blonde hair ? so what. It is the skeletal traits that matters not hair/eye color which hare superficial traits.

pigmentation means (hair, eyes, and the pigment of body).

In your photo westerners are represented as man like Kevin De Bruyne, which is not true actually.

About skeletal traits, i agree. Similar are western and nordic people. But pigmentation totally different.
10-13-2017, 01:36 PM
ButlerKing

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hudayar

Turkmens being over 50% mongoloid sounds suspicious to me. On MDLP K23b spreadsheet they're 20-30% mongoloid. where did you get that pic from?

I find this study extremely suspicious too. If this study of Uyghur is correct that means Uyghur are suppose to be even more West/Eurasian/Caucasoid than Uzbeks and Turkmen

As we all know from other charts CHB is Chinese or a proxy to East Asian population and CEU Central Europeans or proxy to European.

UIG is Uyghur.

http://i63.tinypic.com/wk45n9.jpg
10-13-2017, 01:43 PM
ButlerKing

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlatko Vukovic

pigmentation means (hair, eyes, and the pigment of body).

In your photo westerners are represented as man like Kevin De Bruyne, which is not true actually.

About skeletal traits, i agree. Similar are western and nordic people. But pigmentation totally different.

Pigmentation occurs occasionally in genetically 100% ASI people in South India. By your logic they should be accepted as Caucasoid Nordics.

https://i0.wp.com/farm4.staticflickr...c731de01_z.jpg
10-13-2017, 01:51 PM
Vlatko Vukovic

Quote:

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Pigmentation occurs occasionally in genetically 100% ASI people in South India. By your logic they should be accepted as Caucasoid Nordics.

https://i0.wp.com/farm4.staticflickr...c731de01_z.jpg

No. I just said that Nordic peoples and Western are not same at all.
10-13-2017, 02:57 PM
Sika

Quote:

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

A lot of Idiots keep claiming South Asians are not Caucasoid. Firstable South Asians are a mix of West Eurasian + ASI components. Firstable the first Caucasoid properly didn't exist in Europe.

1) The ASI component in South Asians is not necessarily Australoid, many claims it's a proto-Caucasoid. Also ASI it's closer to West Eurasian than to East Asian and Sub-Saharan DNA.

2) ASI which is predominant in South India are all anthropologically different from the Australoid Negrito and Australian aborigines that resemble Africans not to mention Australoid have many different variations not just a African-look alike type but others like Caucasoid.

Where is your pure Caucasoid genetically. There is none, if if they are 99.98% West Eurasian genetically it doesn't make you pure. So what's a pure Caucasoid

This is so dumb and cringe worthy.

ASI is part of ENA, ENA peaks in Asians, Australasian, Oceanians. ENA is part of Crown Eurasians (ENA, ANE, WHG). None of the Crown Eurasians were "Caucasoid", so-called "Caucasoid" probably emerged in Near East as a mix of WHG/UHG + Basal Eurasian.

All West Eurasians today are mix of Crown Eurasian + Basal Eurasian. While Asians, Australiasians, Pacific Oceanians are purely ENA, while Native Americans are ENA + ANE.

We see the same in Europe, high WHG (one of crown Eurasian) admixture = Less Caucasoid facial morphology. While, high EEF/Neolithic farmer (which has Basal admixture) = More Caucasoid facial morphology.

https://i.imgur.com/6mf1tS5.jpg
10-13-2017, 03:22 PM
ButlerKing

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sika

This is so dumb and cringe worthy.

ASI is part of ENA, ENA peaks in Asians, Australasian, Oceanians. ENA is part of Crown Eurasians (ENA, ANE, WHG). None of the Crown Eurasians were "Caucasoid", so-called "Caucasoid" probably emerged in Near East as a mix of WHG/UHG + Basal Eurasian.

All West Eurasians today are mix of Crown Eurasian + Basal Eurasian. While Asians, Australiasians, Pacific Oceanians are purely ENA, while Native Americans are ENA + ANE.

We see the same in Europe, high WHG (one of crown Eurasian) admixture = Less Caucasoid facial morphology. While, high EEF/Neolithic farmer (which has Basal admixture) = More Caucasoid facial morphology.

https://i.imgur.com/6mf1tS5.jpg

You say ASI is part of ENA which included Asians, Australiasians, Pacific Oceanians

But ASI which peaks in South India produces the most Caucasoid morphology of all races ( without even having West Eurasian admixture). Physical features of the Veddoids were considered proto-Caucasoid/Europoid by many anthropologist because they resembled so much eachother while the same can't be said with the others.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C10yBOaW8AAnehQ.jpg
http://www.sagesse-primordiale.com/b...tent/vedda.jpg
10-13-2017, 03:36 PM
Tauromachos

Quote:

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

You say ASI is part of ENA which included Asians, Australiasians, Pacific Oceanians

ENNA with double NN is a town in Sicily
Thats the only thing i know so far :)

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page