They would be probably more if you model them with another southasian population. I believe roma are 50-60% southasian, well some are less though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
Printable View
They would be probably more if you model them with another southasian population. I believe roma are 50-60% southasian, well some are less though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
ASI genes are not more dominant then black genes are or aboriginal australian genes and someone with that amount wouldnt look straight up aboriginal or black. 23andme did a study that people roughly 30% black and less tend to identify as white. Im sure it is wrong. Gypsies look like straight out of india. And even if the original gypsies have been the blackest darkest southasians they still would be 50-60% because they are almost as black as that. They cant be that few. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=...55484644105003Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
The half blood looks alot lighter and more european then my Uncles and Mum. Let alone the quadroon. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=...55484644105003
Gypsies are descended from dalits so chamars are the best source population. There may be variation among them. Those in more rural areas might be more south asian. Even among your relatives there could be some variation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mortimer
I dont know if that is certain that gypsies are descended from dalits. They had several populations compared to them like Kashmiri Pandit too and those are not dalits. I mean that autosomally their southasian is like Kashmiri Pandit. Also Meghwal but those are dalits. Their southasian is Northwestern Indian. I dont know if they are neccessarily dalits though. A DNA study Tracing y-DNA did say so though. Another study very recent said gypsies have alot in common with populations in Pakistan like Sindi etc. I posted that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk