Are trace amounts of 0.1% reliable? There’s probably a reason why Ancestry doesn’t include groups that score under 1%Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
Printable View
Are trace amounts of 0.1% reliable? There’s probably a reason why Ancestry doesn’t include groups that score under 1%Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
The average amount seems to be 0.8%. At least among my 23andMe relatives (see above, I edited my post).Quote:
Originally Posted by drb234
Is there any way Mr Peterski you can actually create a one for latm ? To see which one are the most Jewish.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
Maybe! Argentano created a spreadsheet with Latino 23andMe results and he invited me to edit this spreadsheet, so I can check it. BTW if you have any 23andMe results of Latinos send me them via private message and I will add them to Argentano's sheet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanyx
https://media.springernature.com/ful...ML.png?as=webpQuote:
Originally Posted by Vanyx
https://www.nature.com/articles/s414...36-3/figures/2
Very cool :) but I don't understand, I would probably ask ChatGPT to translate it.Quote:
Originally Posted by drb234
BTW drb234 why do you think it is Ruthenian?
What the hell is all that "Other" stuff?Quote:
Originally Posted by drb234
Based on surnames it is a very close call (5.5% vs. 5.0% according to Olszak-Przytycki, if his data is reliable).
However some ancestry from these groups could be absorbed by Poles even before surnames became common.
I dont, I just answered the poll instinctively without thinking about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski