https://i.postimg.cc/ZY8Wn5FT/Captur...-04-221711.png
Printable View
It doesn't like my National Geographic > FTDNA data. It only had 15 out of the 50 SNPs they're looking at. I have brown hair and balding, lol.
https://i.imgur.com/oubN9D0.png
This incorporates an insufficient number of SNPs.
It will probably get better later on. A lot of things suck on Day 0 now a days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Flashball
With ancestry DNA raw data
The first in OP was 23andme
https://i.ibb.co/h1ty9rRG/IMG-20260306-100303.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/CZcxS0v/IMG-20260306-100324.jpg
I thought it was good!
A small but reasonable mistake. Understandable: Although my eyes are brown, I have light eye alleles. My daughter has green eyes. My siblings have green eyes.
https://i.imgur.com/S44inoZ.png
https://i.imgur.com/0f6UmLG.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by Fabricius
https://i.imgur.com/t1IMxRy.png
I'm 177cm tall
https://i.imgur.com/m1V9YYg.png
https://i.imgur.com/gq4xvIy.png
About baldness, my maternal grandfather was bald, but my paternal grandfather had hair and my father has hair.
I'm 40 years old and still full of hair.
https://i.imgur.com/prctGx6.png
https://i.imgur.com/A6jMf5I.png
I have AG on the snp which it says strongest skin pigmentation thats why it portrays me dark but i think im slightly lightened by all other snps where it says light skinnedQuote:
Originally Posted by Fabricius
I think 23andme has me more correct somewhere between beige and olive not really dark brown i will post my 23andme skin report
Its also interesting that it predicts my hair as lighter then it is maybe i have reccesive blonde snps which are not expressed in real life 23andme is more correct about my hair too it says between dark brown and black