http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/u...lus/world9.jpg
Printable View
Amerindian 1.58%
East_Asian -
African -
Atlantic_Baltic 70.38%
Australasian 0.23%
Siberian 0.52%
Caucasus_Gedrosia 13.45%
Southern 13.67%
South_Asian 0.18%
Atlantic_Baltic 70.31%
Caucasus_Gedrosia 13.66%
Southern 9.01%
African 2.43%
East_Asian 1.40%
Australasian 1.18%
Amerindian 0.91%
South_Asian 0.90%
Siberian 0.20%
http://i1162.photobucket.com/albums/...psd24cfef7.png
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raine
http://imageshack.us/a/img19/3858/9s8.png
No, I think 32% is typical for a Jew. LOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raine
We're exactly the same % African. HAHA;)Quote:
Originally Posted by mark
Your Atlantic-Baltic is higher than Dodecad Greek average and your general score's very close to iNird AlbanianQuote:
Originally Posted by Raine
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...jTVdfZEE#gid=0
Fascinating. I got very similar results.Quote:
Originally Posted by alfieb
Atlantic_Baltic 38.45%
Southern 34.71%
Caucasus_Gedrosia 23.87%
Siberian 1.14%
African 1%
Australasian 0.72%
South_Asian 0.11%
(Is everything below like 1% just noise?)
My Dodecad World9 results from GEDmatch. As expected the Atlantic_Baltic component dominates my results.
Population
Amerindian 1.50%
East_Asian -
African 0.19%
Atlantic_Baltic 64.11%
Australasian 0.73%
Siberian 2.30%
Caucasus_Gedrosia 16.27%
Southern 14.84%
South_Asian -
Here is what Dienekes himself said to me about the origins of the Atlantic_Baltic component.
''Atlantic_Baltic is a component that reaches its highest levels in the far edge of Europe, i.e., the Atlantic facade and the Baltic area. My analysis of ancient European hunter-gatherers from Iberia and Sweden has shown them to belong ~100% in this component, indicating that it incorporate (while not identical to) the legacy of pre-Neolithic Europe.''
My results are typical for so called mainland Greeks, if anything I got lower Baltic than some other results I've seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by MfA_
Good for you. "LOL"Quote:
Originally Posted by Philo