cool story bro. do you hear them what they spoke?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
cool story bro. do you hear them what they spoke?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
you just have no arguments like every retarded pan-turanian. We can all see this inferiority complex of pan-turanians because they are just descendants of people who were the slaves of the real tuco-mongolian elite.Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
do you have arguments, you much more mr. retarded? tell me do you hear what they spoke ha?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
I'm talking to an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Petros Houhoulis
1. The classification of the Korean and Japanese language is heavily disputed.
2. Haplogroup C is far from being shared/ancestral HG for Altaic-speaking peoples. Even haplogroup Q and R1a sounds more plausible.
3. R1a peaks in Altai people, C doesn't.
R1b is not even Indo-European.Quote:
Originally Posted by Petros Houhoulis
Caucasus people have nothing to do with Scythians, as study shows, they are Slavs, but probably some of the Caucasus people later on joined the horde, and today we can see that they share some similarities with Russians.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
Antic Greeks called them speakers of "european type of iranic", however protoslavic language to a greeks would sound iranic, because they are similar
https://faculty.unlv.edu/jmstitt/Eng...umSatemMap.gif
Moron. :picard2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
give him for his Iranianess that ahmedinejad offspringQuote:
Originally Posted by Danishmend
That fantasy guy on the right looks like textbook Kiphak btw.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
So turks think they are descendant from people from east Europe and Russians, nice!
Before they all had truly dominating "arian" genes for light hair and eyes, but now that is just superficial way of looking at it...
So what is next?
You are aliens, and shapeshifters
Well, no.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
well yes, you have just proclaimed slavs as turkic, that is basically what you are saying, except the last part about alien shapeshifters, i am still waiting on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Hċkan
Before interacting with Turkic peoples (such as Cumans); classic steppe tactics/weapons such as horse-archery, Parthian shot, composite bow etc were unknown to Slavs. Scythians my ass.
Slavic homeland
http://global.britannica.com/EBcheck...Pripet-Marshes
lol what? black is white? and day is night?Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
they hunted still frogs in their marsh during time, if they even exist, what a funny guy...Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Hċkan
Turks are pure mongolians who are arabic looking aryans and have west asian genes :bored: I wonder why this trolls are not banned yet
you know what is problem with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Danishmend
Genetic research disproves that theory, and it lacks common sense, since slavs are much more wide spread and numerus than that
As for comment of not knowing to use bow and arrow, i can just laugh at that, tho, we preferred good armor, and old fashioned lance impaling a turk, its much more visceral
why you do not go back to your Ahmedinejadistan and be rich with your Nikāḥ al-Mutʿah you irano-gypo troll?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
Too bad then that a 24.000 year old guy with the name Mal'ta was a pure Mongolia ancestor of many modern Europeans. Normally people like you are banned. You will not survive in TA if you keep your trollish skills.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
As far as I see, you're the only Iranian troll scum in here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
haha i am neither iranian nor persian and i am just amazed to see how people which ancestors were 100 years ago ordinary kurds, armenians or greeks, think now they are pure mongolians and also pure aryans. You are just wannabe turks and a bunch of people with a stockholm syndrom.Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
So bananas are shapeshifting apples in reality? now I... understand... :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
when you speak, anything is possible, even bananas who are actually shapeshifitin applesQuote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Hċkan
Oh, I was just reflecting your words.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
lol, wtf is going on here. slavic-scythian relation theory (it's not even a theory anymore) is even weaker than turkic one. no one mentioned it since last 100 years. you're truely idiot that trying to show himself as a scythian descented.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
These turks are retarded to the core
http://culture.karelia.ru/files/phot...le_big/569.jpg
http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com...nstruction.jpg
http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com...ruction%29.jpg
to think thise people are one in the same as these
http://i48.tinypic.com/2cz4nwz.jpg
Did you know I hate cherry picking?Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
Genetic researches also disprove the theory of Slavs being Scythian.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
Bow was one of the main weapons used by steppe peoples, it's normal for marsh-folks (Slavs) to underestimate the powerful combination of bow & horse.
they are losers who have nothing to be proud of so they create their own fantasy world, where mongolians and scythians are the same. It is hopeless to discuss with themQuote:
Originally Posted by Duke
thats gokturk, fucking cherry piciking, yeaQuote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Hċkan
slavs are not direct descendants of scythians but they are indoeuropeans and have much indoeuropean blood so they are indeed related to scythians unlike mongolians and wannabe turks of anatoliaQuote:
Originally Posted by Danishmend
He looks like this Turk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke
http://i.imgur.com/CoFxfxS.jpg
yeaQuote:
Originally Posted by Duke
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/att...9&d=1388851352
It's difficult to find a Turk without East Asian/Siberian admixture, which is absent in ordinary Greeks & Armenians. You can't even know the difference between a Turk and a Mongol you moron.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
http://www.reactionface.info/sites/d...0564987331.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Kipchak Hċkan
Genetic has shown scythians are eastern europeans, i.e. SlavsQuote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
We Croats were called sarmatian in the begining by the Romans, its just old name for Slavs
scythian mummy
http://newobserveronline.com/wp-cont...an-mummy01.jpg
http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/wp-...erFacePalm.jpg
Iranian people's heritage and history keep getting plagurized and stolen by pan-turanists much like afrocentrics steal Egypt from the real Egyptians. Have you ever seen an Ossetian, Pashtun, Pamiri, Yaghnobi, and other eastern iranian people? Turkic people have NOTHING do to with the ancient iranian people in central, south and west asia, and anyone who believe that the Saka, Sarmatian, Scythian and other nomadic Aryans(Indo-Iranians) were somehow Turkic turnaid really needs a smack on the head really hard.
Ossetians:
http://thefamilywithoutborders.com/w...fugee_Camp.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...tia-alagir.jpg
http://i1.trekearth.com/photos/128449/three_graces.jpg
In a study conducted in 2014 by VV Ilyinskyon on bone fragments from 12 Alanic burials on the Don River, 6 samples turned out belonging to yDNA Haplogroup G2 and 6 samples belonging to mtDNA I. This is a strong argument for direct Alan ancestry of Ossetians and against the hypothesis that Ossetians are alanized Caucasic Speakers, since the major Haplogroup among Ossetians is G2*
https://www.academia.edu/7061155/%D0...D0%A1._312-315
Pan-Turanism, like any other ethnocentric groups, is a myth based on lies and hate. Iranian peoples had nothing to do with Turkic peoples, and really, its the Iranians were the ones who had greatly influenced Turkic peoples in their culture and etc rather than vice versa. The Seljuk Turks were heavily persianied in their literature, culture, architecture and etc.
embrace the Mongol cowboy in youQuote:
Originally Posted by Solin
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/228/45...44a9705d_b.jpg
anatolian turks are genetically closer to kurds, armenians and anatolian greeks than to other turks. The only difference is that turks have few percentage more east asian admixture but is is very low and some turks have no. You are of course still turks because you speak a altaic language and identify as such but genetically you have not much to do with real turks. It is just funny to see that the most annoying pan-turanians are always the turks who have the lowest percentages of east asian blood. Real turks like kazakh dont care about pan-turanismQuote:
Originally Posted by Danishmend
Anatolian Turks: 28% TurkicQuote:
Originally Posted by Vir9
Armenians: 42% Turkic
Kurds: very close to Turkic like Armenian