Mine too actually.. haha funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by Annihilus
Printable View
Mine too actually.. haha funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by Annihilus
Heres mine, but i used the calculator too because it's more easy to understand, most to least.
BR2 = 25.47% shared
Linearbandkeramik = 23.04% shared
NE1 = 22.86% shared
Ust-Ishim = 19.56% shared
Loschbour = 18.87% shared
Clovis Anzick-1 = 15.39% shared
NE6 = 11.58% shared
Motala12 = 11.48% shared
La Brana Arintero = 11.43% shared
IR1 = 11.34% shared
KO1 = 11.22% shared
NE5 = 11.01% shared
Kostenki14 = 10.89% shared
CO1 = 10.70% shared
BR1 = 10.64% shared
NE7 = 10.59% shared
Mal'ta = 7.41% shared
Australian Aboriginal = 6.06% shared
Palaeo-Eskimo = 4.94% shared
Gokhem2 = 4.34% shared
Hinxton-4 = 3.67% shared
Hinxton-3 = 3.46% shared
Hinxton-2 = 3.12% shared
Hinxton-1 = 2.97% shared
Hinxton-5 = 2.93% shared
Vi33.26 Neanderthal = 1.77% shared
Vi33.25 Neanderthal = 1.36% shared
Vi33.16 Neanderthal = 1.23% shared
Altai Neanderthal = 0.40% shared
Denisova = 0.39%
cousin:love0031:Quote:
Originally Posted by Nehellenia
Wow, Hakon's matches are incredible and on so many chromosomes.
Ust-Ishim
http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/...psj10tlabn.png
LBK
http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/...ps3grpahvr.png
RISE174
http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/...pss8zrmhue.png
Loschbour
http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/...psb7bsepoj.png
"Segments shown are larger than 3.0 cM and 300 SNPs:"
Spoiler!
Only two matched >3 cM were:
NE1, Hungary 7.2k - 843 SNPs over 3.6 cM
Ust-Ishim, Siberia 45k - 756 SNPs over 3 cM
Is it so unusual? I think I'm more related to most of them than she is. I imagine most Caucasians are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zmey Gorynych
Well, I'm new to all this and almost anything is wow to me. I looked at your results and you have more matches but on fewer(less) segments. She has a great match with Ust-Ishim and BR2 (over 20 segments each).Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbowman
I find it strange how quite a few match Loschbour but not La Brana.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zmey Gorynych
Probably La Brana was just incel.
Longer segment length = more recent relation ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Zmey Gorynych
So the trick isn't to have many segments or large totals but large individual segments. Even in this case she beats everyone in this thread (6.5 with Ust-Ishim). I'm very close (6.4 with Loschbour) but still only second.Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbowman
Large totals are also indicative, but longer segment lengths are perhaps slightly more indicative. Many segments, however, means almost nothing. In fact it would indicate a more distant relationship.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zmey Gorynych
http://v2.gedmatch.com/gifs/archaic_M535853_EB4566.gif
Does it mean anything?
change this "Upper Segment Threshold Limit:" to 3cM and run again :thumb001:Quote:
Originally Posted by Grünmann
I tried that and I tried to link you to the pic but its weird, its not showing up.Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
http://v2.gedmatch.com/gifs/archaic_M535853_EB4566.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
Okay here
what does it mean?
Wait what's going on? The picture keeps changing.
here you can search about them, http://www.y-str.org/p/ancient-dna.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by Grünmann
and wow you got RISE497, which means you have a part Turkic (Karasuk) ancestry my frend :thumb001:
That is interesting but IDK for sure because something weird happened, the picture I uploaded changed a couple of times.Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
See look at the picture, now I don't have RISE497. I did a minute ago..something fishy going on.Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
NOW IT'S BACK AGAIN
Is strange for people like me to have some distant Turkic or Karasuk input?Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
I do find that interesting.
take a screenshot, i prefer this apps http://screengrab.doomer.org/Quote:
Originally Posted by Grünmann
Thanks. But how do I take a screenshot when on my screen I can not see the whole picture without moving sidebar?Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
no not strange really, some very old euroasian atraction of your ancestors guess :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Grünmann
Updated @ 3cM
http://s15.postimg.org/xdtougusr/archaicm5.jpg
Hm. I read on the wiki article for the Karasuk that they were Indo-Iranians or Proto-Iranian. It says they were Europoid and light-eyed. Sounds like an interesting people...Also:Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
The Karasuk economy was mixed agriculture and stockbreeding.[1] It's culture appears to have been more mobile than the Andronovo.[1] The Karasuk were farmers who practiced metallurgy on a large scale.[2] Arsenical bronze artefacts are present.[1] Their settlements were of pit houses and they buried their dead in stone cists covered by kurgans and surrounded by square stone enclosures.[1] Industrially, they were skilled metalworkers, the diagnostic artifacts of the culture being a bronze knife with curving profiles and a decorated handle and horse bridles.[1] The pottery has been compared to that discovered in Inner Mongolia and the interior of China, with burials bronze knives similar to those from northeastern China.[5] Their realistic animal art probably contributed to the development of the Scytho-Siberian animal art style (Scythian art).
wikipedia and iranians :rolleyes: haha they will really never stop.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grünmann
do this look to you like an iranian or indo-european ?
Kit Num: F999957
Threshold of components set to 1.000
Threshold of method set to 0.25%
Personal data has been read. 20 approximations mode.
Gedmatch.Com
MDLP K23b 4-Ancestors Oracle
This program is based on 4-Ancestors Oracle Version 0.96 by Alexandr Burnashev.
Questions about results should be sent to him at: Alexandr.Burnashev@gmail.com
Original concept proposed by Sergey Kozlov.
Many thanks to Alexandr for helping us get this web version developed.
MDLP K23b Oracle Rev 2014 Sep 16
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 East_Siberian 33.06
2 Tungus-Altaic 28.73
3 Ancestral_Altaic 15.07
4 Arctic 7.04
5 Amerindian 5.15
6 Paleo_Siberian 4.72
7 South_East_Asian 4.64
Finished reading population data. 620 populations found.
23 components mode.
--------------------------------
Least-squares method.
Using 1 population approximation:
1 Tuvinian @ 17.178774
2 Hakas @ 18.708857
3 Altaian @ 19.593048
4 Buryat @ 25.840517
5 Yakut @ 26.899887
6 Yakut_Anabarsky_ulus @ 27.763462
7 Yukagir_Tundra @ 27.924835
8 Even @ 28.455612
9 Kyrgyz_Bishkek @ 28.466404
10 Kazakh @ 28.808006
11 Kyrgyz @ 28.874647
12 Kalmyk @ 28.884256
13 Oroqen @ 29.093689
14 Mongolian @ 29.324993
15 Tatar-Siberian @ 29.742289
16 Selkup @ 29.925838
17 Kazahs @ 29.940317
18 Dolgan @ 30.169996
19 Karakalpak @ 35.421398
20 Evenk @ 35.635632
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Buryat +50% Selkup @ 9.916115
Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Buryat +25% Khant +25% Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.036392
Using 4 populations approximation:
1 Buryat + Ket + Tuvinian + Yukagir_Tundra @ 7.688059
2 Altaian + Buryat + Ket + Yukagir_Tundra @ 7.695191
3 Ket + Mongolian + Tuvinian + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.003474
4 Buryat + Buryat + Khant + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.036392
5 Kalmyk + Ket + Tuvinian + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.042251
6 Altaian + Ket + Oroqen + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.069797
7 Ket + Tuvinian + Tuvinian + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.077109
8 Altaian + Ket + Tuvinian + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.094432
9 Buryat + Buryat + Ket + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.121552
10 Ket + Oroqen + Selkup + Ulchi @ 8.292628
11 Buryat + Hakas + Ket + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.297212
12 Buryat + Khant + Tuvinian + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.311689
13 Hakas + Ket + Oroqen + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.332044
14 Buryat + Ket + Selkup + Ulchi @ 8.521254
15 Buryat + Ket + Mongolian + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.534410
16 Buryat + Kalmyk + Ket + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.539923
17 Buryat + Khant + Oroqen + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.562801
18 Ket + Oroqen + Tuvinian + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.571683
19 Kalmyk + Ket + Ket + Ulchi @ 8.583029
20 Nenets_Tundra + Oroqen + Tubalar + Yukagir_Tundra @ 8.610031
and some other Karasuk results https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1540247964
http://i.hizliresim.com/rQb1rz.png
Ah..so not the ancestors of Persians, but more like Mongoloids...? Turkic is a language family to me, I don't know what the ethnicity of the Karasuk culture people would have been...Mongoloid? But on the wiki it says they were 'Europoid' with light eyes. I am not sure what to think of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
yes they had light eyes and . you see also the results. they were clearly Turkic close to Bashkir's . higher E.Asian admix. comes in later examples of recent periodsQuote:
Originally Posted by Grünmann
Interesting. So my ancestors were Turkic :)Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
http://s7.postimg.org/lim7x4gcr/arch...EB4566_gif.jpg
Kit Num: F999953 RISE505
Using 1 population approximation:
1 Swede_Saami @ 15.485921
:p
how did you do this?Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
l have just runned the kit number of my match on gedmatch with MdlpK23 oracle , you can see the kit numbers on left of your match pageQuote:
Originally Posted by Chloe
I thought you were joking. It's too far , right? My first one was at 4.23 (Sicilian of course :D)Quote:
Originally Posted by gültekin
I'm joining the party!
3.0cM
http://i.imgur.com/aYx8tOy.png
no no i was talking about the kit of archaic matches, for example one them of yours is LBK Stuttgard, kit number is F999916. just try to run on gedmatch with your favor oracle:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloe
i'm jelly for your and Chloe's Karasuk matches :shakefistQuote:
Originally Posted by Marshmallow Fluff