You have Deff, Iberoid ancestry.Quote:
Originally Posted by MsSPF
Printable View
You have Deff, Iberoid ancestry.Quote:
Originally Posted by MsSPF
What a mutt
http://s5.postimg.org/kw6evrod3/noname.jpg
Szwab;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
Give it 20 years and it will be.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albannach
I uploaded some ancient genomes to DNA Land. "North Slavic" was there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albannach
Rathlin 1 from Early Bronze Age Ireland scores 20% North Slavic:
http://s4.postimg.org/tnjgp0cct/Rathlin_1.png
But Hinxton 4 from Iron Age Britain scores only 2% North Slavic:
http://s9.postimg.org/43oxcbmrj/Hinxton_4.png
why Kalash?Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
fixedQuote:
Originally Posted by Annie999
Name "North Slavic" is a bit misleading, since this component is not limited just to Slavs.
It is actually Northeast European minus Finnish, and it peaks among ethnic Lithuanians.
Many ancient Celtic samples score Kalash. Many modern Brits often also score Kalash.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick
Some connection must be there. Something from Proto-Indo-European times maybe.
Nein! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by noricum
I'm at least 94% Polish (among 16 great-great grandparents, only 1 had a Non-Polish surname - and even that with a surname of Non-Polish origin AFAIK identified as an ethnic Pole already at that time; I'm not sure about the generation of 32 great-great-great grandparents - I haven't yet got there with genealogy).
Of course nobody knows "what was there" before people started using their surnames.
But I suppose that in my region other people are also getting very similar results.
Eastern Poles are getting more of North Slavic though. Especially if they are from Kresy.
WOW! You really are a mixture of everything there is to be mixed! :thumb001:Quote:
Originally Posted by ramo
Over 1/4 Native American - a lot! Do you know from which tribe(s) were your native ancestors?
On GedMatch it say's Pima and Mayan. Not sure how accurate that is though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
http://imgur.com/UetiYfn.png
Interesting results, but I'm not sure how much faith to put in this test. The Euro part seems to be a bit of a mess. As far as I know I don't have any ancestry from the Mediterranean islands and I find it surprising that I have more NW Euro ancestry than anyone else who has posted, but maybe it all balances out to equal my mix of British and Spanish mix (plus minor Basque, French, and Swedish).
The 1% Amazonian is interesting, as it points to my Amerindian ancestry being from a more Southern source. I've always wondered if my Amerindian ancestry was from the Caribbean or North America. Considering the Caribbean Natives were thought to have come up the islands from the Amazon, this result seems to suggest the former which is very cool.
Aren't you atypical for a pole? From your thread:Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
What do you look like phenotypically?Quote:
Single Population Sharing:
# Population(source) Distance
1 Polish 2.06
2 Swedish 4.03
3 Norwegian 6.35
4 North_German 6.79
I think I'm typical in my region of Poland, but I haven't seen results of other people from my region.Quote:
Aren't you atypical for a pole?
I guess it depends on calculator. In PuntDNAL K15 I'm getting 1 Polish, 2 Swedish and 3 Norwegian.Quote:
From your thread:
# Population(source) Distance
1 Polish 2.06
2 Swedish 4.03
3 Norwegian 6.35
4 North_German 6.79
But in some other calculators:
(Eurogenes gives me South_Polish first, which is weird because I'm from a rather northern region):
Eurogenes K13:
# Population (source) Distance
1 South_Polish 2.52
2 Polish 5
3 Ukrainian 5.19
4 Ukrainian_Lviv 5.45
Eurogenes EUtest V2 K15:
# Population (source) Distance
1 South_Polish 3.38
2 Polish 4.37
3 Ukrainian 5.96
4 Ukrainian_Lviv 6.15
Ancient Eurasia K6:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Ukrainian 2.07
2 Norwegian 2.41
3 Czech 2.78
4 Scottish 3.08
Eurasia K9 ASI:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Scottish 2.96
2 Ukrainian 3.12
3 Czech 3.66
4 Norwegian 3.71
Gedrosia K15:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Hungarian 5.62
2 Czech 7.44
3 Croatian 8.45
4 Norwegian 8.54
Eurasia K14 Neolithic:
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 74% Unetice_BA1 + 26% Hungarian_BA5 @ 3.52
Near East Neolithic K13:
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 87.9% Scottish + 12.1% Steppe_IA @ 2.43
2 86.1% Czech + 13.9% Steppe_IA @ 2.83
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Bulgarian +50% Estonian @ 4.954492
puntDNAL K12 Ancient:
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Corded_Ware_Estonia_RISE00 +50% Bell_Beaker_Germany_I1549 @ 3.245664
Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Sintashta_MBA_RISE_386 +25% Bell_Beaker_Germany_I1549 +25% Vatya_SG_RISE479 @ 2.009034
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 59.4% Sintashta_MBA_RISE_386 + 40.6% Vatya_SG_RISE479 @ 1.97
World9 Oracle:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Ukranians (Yunusbayev) 2.4
2 Dutch (Dodecad) 4.18
3 German (Dodecad) 4.19
4 Argyll (1000 Genomes) 4.27
5 Polish (Dodecad) 4.31
6 CEU30 (1000Genomes) 4.98
7 Irish (Dodecad) 5.19
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Dutch +50% Ukranians @ 2.129017
Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Polish +25% Lithuanians +25% Bulgarians @ 1.517354
Dodecad K12b:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Hungarians (Behar) 7.62
2 German (Dodecad) 9.92
3 Polish (Dodecad) 10.01
4 Swedish (Dodecad) 12.49
5 Ukranians (Yunusbayev) 12.55
6 Mixed_Slav (Dodecad) 12.9
7 Norwegian (Dodecad) 15.01
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Mixed_Germanic + 50% Russian_B @ 2.829949
Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Hungarians +25% Lithuanians +25% Mixed_Germanic @ 2.241698
Using 4 populations approximation:
1 German + Mixed_Germanic + Russian_B + Ukranians @ 2.008708
2 Belorussian + German + Mixed_Germanic + Ukranians @ 2.156967
3 German + Mixed_Germanic + Mixed_Slav + Ukranians @ 2.211182
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 58.1% Ukranians (Yunusbayev) + 41.9% Mixed_Germanic (Dodecad) @ 1.9
I could pass in North-Eastern, Central and Northern Europe I think.Quote:
What do you look like phenotypically?
Mine is incredibly boring.
http://i63.tinypic.com/2reu07n.jpg
You are the most "North-Western" result I have seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley
Do you know which part of Ireland are you from ???
It's weird, look my results:Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley
https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/11...923/zZHoWe.png
I have 1,9% ambiguous, but Dna Land indicates that i'm 100% West Eurasian ; you, you have 1,8% ambiguous, but you are 98% European according Dna Land xD
My father's family was from Sligo/Roscommon so sort of north-western Ireland and my mother was from North Tipperary. It's pretty extreme but all my results are. I have other family members on dna.land who have a few extra categories in their results.Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
I would like a chart like that. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Enflamme
Grace, your "opposite" is ancient DNA sample RISE598 from Late Bronze Age Lithuania:
He scores 100% North-Eastern European (which includes "North Slavic" and "Finnish"):
https://s21.postimg.io/iaa9n28yv/RISE598.png
https://s21.postimg.io/iaa9n28yv/RISE598.png
That explains it. I'm a fossil. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
There are various kinds of Ambiguous. If you are 100% West Eurasian then it means that your Ambiguous is also West Eurasian, but hard to say what it is (it could be anything from West Eurasia).Quote:
Originally Posted by Enflamme
Yeah, according Dna Land:Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
"Ambiguous West Eurasian:
West Eurasian is a very general category containing Arab/Egyptian, Ashkenazi/Levantine, Central Asian, Northeast European, South Asian, South European, Northwest European, Southwestern European and Central Indoeuropean."
Eurasian 100% Northwest European 61%
Southwestern European 19%
Balkan 15%
Northeast European 4% North Slavic 2.1%
Finnish 1.9%
Since these were deleted
Mine
http://i66.tinypic.com/2w1uzhl.png
Brother
http://i64.tinypic.com/2m79r2v.jpg
I SEE THE SOUTH/CENTRAL USED TO BE 'ITALIAN' BEFORE
http://i65.tinypic.com/169fd01.jpg
Do you think the appearance of Sardinian is recent Italian ancestry such as from the Roman Empire or from an even older time when Etruscans were still migrating out of Anatolia?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloe
It's not too recent, 23andme gives me only 2% Italian.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aemilius
Iron Age Bulgarian P192_1 :
100% Mediterranean Islander
Bronze Age Montenegro RISE 595 (mtDNA U5a2d):
https://snag.gy/eafGiV.jpg
Iron Age Montenegro RISE 596 (mtDNA X):
https://snag.gy/nMWtwG.jpg
RISE 595 seems to cluster with Sicilians, when the guys at anthrogenica included the sample on pca it was below Albanian and Greek members.
Why do you have 25% NW European?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick
The bronze age sample is practically a replica of my result on DNA.land. I only have a bit more Northeast Europe and ambiguous. The iron age sample is weird with a lot of North Slavic, however.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ylla
I DONT KNOW. ID RATHER KNOW WHY I HAVE 8.7 ASHKENAZI :flynch:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloe
I uploaded mine again because i got so much ambiguous before:
http://i63.tinypic.com/2qdwrqe.png
Indo-EuR1opean confirmed
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/494961dnzlk.png
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/994156dnzlm.png