Distance to: Francisco_scaled
0.93469132 Clint_Chimpanzee
Target: Francisco_scaled
Distance: 93.4691% / 0.93469132
100.0 Clint_Chimpanzee
Printable View
Distance to: Francisco_scaled
0.93469132 Clint_Chimpanzee
Target: Francisco_scaled
Distance: 93.4691% / 0.93469132
100.0 Clint_Chimpanzee
Distance to: VASILIKI_scaled
0.93735246 Clint_Chimpanzee
What the heck... San people are closer than some half a million year old non sapiens species.Quote:
Originally Posted by cass
Sometimes i really wonder if that much got out of Africa and it was not the other way for the most part. The recent "OoA" samples didn't look African, no more than the 50ky old people already present there. What if Eurasians of the first OoA came back and mixed with some chimp/human hybrids down there? South Africa's San/Ju Hoan look suspiciously like Naledi/Turkana (Erectus). That doesn't even violate uniparental markers.
https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/bc/5d/63/...2d0743f289.jpg
Distance to: Anatolya_scaled
0.92644990 Clint_Chimpanzee
Distance to: Kruzek_scaled
0.95048400 Clint_Chimpanzee
far away:rolleyes:
There is a tiny club of 95's but the European variation is not huge, something like 2-3 by the look of it, compared to SSA that is crazy high in the last 2000 years apparently (10 to 50), even if there is a calculator effect.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wend-Kruzek
What are your normal distances to Africans and other non euro? It's linked
Code:Oceanian_Papuan,-0.0459844,-0.2410866,-0.2637584,0.3092414,0.2069308,-0.509589,-0.001974,0.0070152,-0.041273,-0.0119546,-0.018902,0.000869,0.0013974,-0.00311,0.0001628,-0.0003186,-0.0021906,-0.0018498,-0.001081,-0.0015256,0.0023458,0.0018052,0.0012324,0.0018314, 0.0016048
Amerindian_Native,0.0529278,-0.328016,0.1120048,0.0774392,-0.1061738,-0.0184068,-0.1983488,-0.2347978,-0.0037325,-0.020137,0.0082817,-0.0034098,0.0063925,6.87e-05,-0.0151328,-0.004508,-0.0005215,0.0032622,0.0115015,0.0073472,0.0038682,-0.0107578,0.0027115,0.0062055,0.0092805
East_Asian,0.0229543,-0.445479,0.0130733,-0.059109,0.0362118,0.0093428,0.003525,0.0005768,-0.0065105,0.0106607,-0.0740492,-0.0074685,0.011546,-0.0070647,-0.0110612,-0.004464,0.0003042,0.0035895,0.001676,-0.0092547,0.0270355,-0.01659,0.0049093,0.003374,-0.0419723
African_Nigerian,-0.6321452,0.064613,0.02324,0.0182899,-0.0031929,0.0146768,-0.0412151,0.0464115,-0.0510541,0.0350349,0.0082612,-0.0014613,0.0233582,0.0032685,0.012147,-0.0095133,0.0067475,0.003294,0.006065,-0.0035332,0.0003899,0.0012829,-0.000724,-0.0002561,-0.000928
Distance to: Ylla_scaled
0.93483383 Clint_Chimpanzee
I'm a whole chimp then.
Distance to: G25noricum_scaled
0.94467304 Clint_Chimpanzee
Distance to: G25noricum_scaled
0.08185429 Aryan_God
0.20097930 Short_Gracile_Neolithic_people
0.26218465 Levantine
0.34741861 Tall_Robust_Mesolithic_people
0.46527637 South_Asian
0.47912166 North_African
0.61356735 East_Asian
0.67121179 Native_American
0.77462777 African
0.94467304 Clint_Chimpanzee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upsilander
If hybridization really occurred ca 4,000 years ago, no mainstream scientist will confirm it.
Distance to: unmoggable
0.94209870 Clint_Chimpanzee
0.94384017 Clint_Chimpanzee
Distance to: Repent:RealG25_scaled
0.94485853 Clint_Chimpanzee
I will admit that I do not agree that I humans came from monkeys. Or any other evolutionist stuff.
Distance to: Mallisharrit
0.93775385 Clint_Chimpanzee
Am i a chimp or how should i interpret the result?:D
Humans don't descend from Chimps but a much older common ancestor 7 Millions years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Repent
I guess that wouldn't change your belief anyway. Did we land magically on earth a few thousands years ago? From where, and what about the other species? What about the attempts at a reconciling doctrine of the Church on that subject? (it still doesn't make any sense but at least it tries to)
First of all, the result is very far from chimpanzee. Secondly, depends on your believes, but I won't recommend to believe in a evolution cause this is stupid. I can't even really say if those coordinates are real (animals).Quote:
Originally Posted by Mallisharrit
What is written in the beginning of the Old Testament is the start of the humans for me. I do not have to explain it. I believe it, I'm not curious to check the basics with 100% proof, because I do believe my Creator and this is way more brave and way more wiser decision than to believe something else. There are difference between a curiosity (when a person thinks that they are smarter than God, or they do actually need to know that stuff that is pointless and useless and not the greatest question ever or something (that can be named like that because of their vanity or because they are oblivious), especially like to prove it, scepticism is good as long as it about false prophets, heresy, sin; but this is an empty scepticism / curiosity). For everything that is true there should be a lie, so of course evolution theory exists as a lie.Quote:
Originally Posted by Petalpusher
New King James Version
A wise man fears and departs from evil, But a fool rages and is self-confident.
Proverbs 14:16.
It's very simple questions, i don't need your "proofs are bad". So you believe Humans are just divine creations according to the Old Testament but reject the more contemporary stances?Quote:
Originally Posted by Repent
No, sir, I am not here to serve you with how I do write my posts, I am only serving Jesus Christ. Take it or leave it. I did answer the question already.Quote:
Originally Posted by Petalpusher
I just straight away believe that God created us. Nothing complex I am not here to play a pseudo-intellectual. It doesn't matter. What does matter is to develop scepticism to sin, so I am not looking for material evidence I do not suffer from Thomas the Apostle type of disbelief (when he didn't believe that Jesus Christ was resurrected, untill he saw Him in the flesh), that's not my issue and if it is yours issues ask God to help you to solve that issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by BabtistJohn
Jesus Christ was quoting Old Testament to show the people that He is the Messiah, so it is a legit Book. So the God from the Old Testament is legit.
You said evolution is stupid so im testing the (holy) water on what exactly is your view. The Orthodox Church is no less lenient about it, as in Evolution is allowed as long as God is behind it, so there isn't only one view in the theologians of Orthodoxy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Repent
I do not follow evolution. I may agree that degradation is trying to be put on as adaptation / evolution.Quote:
Originally Posted by Petalpusher
So, does that mean that the Bichon sample is 100% Homo-Sapien or very very close to 100% Homo-Sapien? Did WHGs have Neanderthal admix? Or just that sample happened to carry none?Quote:
Originally Posted by Upsilander
I am not paranoid, I do believe in God, I am not that we have to have 100% right Bible in our hands first edition fanatic guy. I've already answered your first question in my reply before. I didn't read them and I do not plan to. Noah didn't have the Bible and he was the one who make the humans worth saving, before Jesus Christ made His sacrifice. So be with God and talk to God (Jesus Christ), ask God (Jesus Christ) to provide for your mind, body, heart and soul and do not sin, if you did sin — repent from your sin. And let the Holy Spirit to guide you.Quote:
Originally Posted by BabtistJohn
This question is a bad question (not an uncomfortable or not the one that cannot be answered), go and ask God to learn that, I do not own you are anything to answer every of your question, because I do respect my time, I am not a nerd or your baby sitter for your religious baby sitter. Respect your own self too, if you were here too out me as a fake Jesus Christ follower or an idiot you should do it in the first question, only a coward will set up a trap, since humans are not animals and there is not hunt or completions between humans. Humans should strive for goodness and not be the best (God have no competition, so why should I have it, since I am human, there is no completion), the completion is fake and a lie. Humans are equal in Jesus Christ. Those who are with Jesus Christ are saved and they are not lottery ticket winners or special, everybody can be like that. And those who are with Satan and lying, well untill they are sinners they are doomed, so repent then again untill it is not too late. And if you know that is not enough, you are not a hard drive disk just remember knowledge and go to another one, go and understand why what I am saying important in general not to me or the others.Quote:
Originally Posted by BabtistJohn
Trust wise man, not smart man. A wise man will never use his knowledge for a bad cause or a scam, a smart one is always quite opposite one because he is an idiot actually hiding behind the mask of pseudo-important knowledge.
No, I won't just say no. I'm not here to please you, brother. I say how I think I should say, if I am making myself I will pay for it and I will have chance to change that, because those who rejects hope = rejects Jesus Christ. If I did a wise move or I am sort of a fool for Jesus Christ, of course I will take that as long as the Holy Spirit will guide me to do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by BabtistJohn
Humble yourself down, while it is a forum that made for discussion and debates, a person might say no to you and to your question and might do it in their own way.
I might not even know the answer for that question, it doesn't matter, since right now I am saying that God (Jesus Christ) is good, that God (Jesus Christ) is real and God (Jesus Christ) is the only way and the truth. It doesn't matter that I didn't discover it in a I will study everything and everywhere, faith is more important. And faith is something that is growing and the growth of faith is more important that asking me a question in an interview style or knowing my opinion, I didn't come here as authority, cause every human being is the same for God (Jesus Christ).
Your expectation is your fantasy and your problems. I remind people about Jesus Christ, how good He is and how He can change everybody's life for good as soon as you start to believe in Him. It is enough for me, I am humble and not trying to be the best at what I am doing, with acknowledging loss and gain. I am not an idealist or a perfectionist, cause God is forgiving and I do not devalue His priority to forgive by trying to hard or to be perfect, nor trying to abuse it by sinning and returning to sin.
Sir, if I am not answering your question directly or do not answer it, it doesn't mean what your think it is, it does mean that I don't think that what are you talking about right now is important. You think that question is that important? Share your answer, help the people and leave me alone with your questions (not the content of the question, the reason why you do ask and try to excuse you). I've never claim to be all knowing (only God (Jesus Christ is) and I do not have to, what I am doing is believing and put my faith in Jesus Christ.
I didn't came for interrogation, look you have questions for me, but I don't have question for you that I am looking for you to answer. If I all ask a question, then I will ask someone who respect themselves and others in God (Jesus Christ), not a random man on the internet since I didn't recognize you as a respectful person, more like polite one, by how I did read your reply to me. But being polite is always a cowardice, because this is the way for bad people to gain what they want and a trap, mind game, to show their disrespect in the end after tolerating someone for something (I was that way and you can try to focus people's attention on my past, but this is a weak man's move to fool everybody, cause I am with Jesus Christ now, I do bash my self for my sin (being open and saying that what I do is bad and worth shame and guilt, and forgiveness from God (Jesus Christ) on internet and IRL and it means (I did call myself a hypocrite at least a few times and this forum, focus on that too, to show people that I ain't perfect, I won't care, I am free now, all thanks to Jesus Christ). Quit acting, praise the Lord (Jesus Christ).
The other way, WHGs and WHG rich population are high Neanderthal, and less basal. Bichon is the least basal, that makes him the most distant to Chimps, and Iran meso/neo the closest. The op results are coherent with studies:Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie
https://i.postimg.cc/kM2tGG4W/Capture455.png
Well, thanks for clarification. I forgot Denisovans were related to Neanderthals and OP shouldn’t have used “furthest” for Natives and Papuans.Quote:
Originally Posted by Petalpusher
Yes if you consider Denisovans, changes a bit but the general idea stays the same, either Neanderthal or Denisovan pulls you a bit away from Chimps. We are talking small differences of course in Eurasia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie
https://i.postimg.cc/VvG8Lh8H/PCA-an...pper-right.png