Here's a model with insanely bloated Syria_MBA. I couldn't find Sidon sample and used Syria instead.
Attachment 142722
Printable View
Here's a model with insanely bloated Syria_MBA. I couldn't find Sidon sample and used Syria instead.
Attachment 142722
A two-way model I've seen on IllustrativeDNA in the bronze age section of deep ancestry:
Attachment 142733
G25:
Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0352% / 0.03515623
84.1 Czech_EBA_Unetice
15.9 Greece_Manika_Helladic_EBA.SG
I'm just looking at this in dribs and drabs and trying to familiarise myself with it's use. I've now realised you don't have to use single samples and I've done this FST distance chart. I'm presuming the negative is a closer distance? I selected the AADR dataset for the populations. There isn't a lot of modern populations to choose from.
Orcadians showing obvious drift which is why they are more distant.
https://i.postimg.cc/HxdhFbNw/Screen...-18-155537.png
I used the Human Origins dataset for this one which has more modern populations. I understand the distances better now. I think when I asked previously I didn't notice that the top pops where negative.
https://i.postimg.cc/XNcQTZKL/PopFST1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/J4pKz92B/PopFST2.png
This is my best model using moderns so far others were coming up False.
https://i.postimg.cc/fRY02P0r/Screen...-18-180254.png
This one is not as close but more realistic than French.
https://i.postimg.cc/nhwc1Y3P/Screen...-18-181606.png
https://i.postimg.cc/C1Hjdx0Y/Screen...-18-192815.png
I'll try other models and will try some ancient ones that are in this thread.
Here's another model that I used
Attachment 142734
Sources 6 / 10
Turkey_Marmara_Barcin_N.AG
Iran_Wezmeh_N.SG
Georgia_Kotias_Mesolithic.SG
Russia_YuzhniyOleniyOstrov_Mesolithic.AG
Israel_Natufian.AG
Mongolia_North_N.AG
References 13 / 30
Mbuti.DG
Austria_Gravettian.AG
Russia_MA1_UP.SG
Russia_LakeBaikal_N.SG
Russia_LenaRiver_N.SG
Turkey_Central_Pinarbasi_Epipaleolithic.AG
Morocco_EN.WGC.SG
Turkey_Central_Boncuklu_PPN.WGC.SG
Russia_Sidelkino_HG.SG
China_Xinjiang_Xiaohe_BA.AG
Georgia_Satsurblia_LateUP.SG
Iran_TepeAbdulHosein_N.SG
India_GreatAndaman_100BP.SG
From what I understand there is really no such thing as negative. It means 0 and very close.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley
It seems you really have Natufian admixture despite the fact that your ancestry is NW Euro.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
5.05% Natufian with 5.93% error margin this component irrelevant for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie
Here's another model that I used this one seems better than the previous.
Attachment 142736
Sources 5 / 10
Turkey_Marmara_Barcin_N.AG
Georgia_Kotias_Mesolithic.SG
Iran_GanjDareh_N.AG
Russia_Murzikha_Eneolithic_Sidelkino.AG
Mongolia_North_N.AG
References 13 / 30
Mbuti.DG
Austria_Gravettian.AG
Russia_MA1_UP.SG
Russia_LakeBaikal_N.SG
Russia_LenaRiver_N.SG
Turkey_Central_Pinarbasi_Epipaleolithic.AG
Morocco_EN.WGC.SG
Turkey_Central_Boncuklu_PPN.WGC.SG
Russia_Sidelkino_HG.SG
China_Xinjiang_Xiaohe_BA.AG
Georgia_Satsurblia_LateUP.SG
Iran_TepeAbdulHosein_N.SG
India_GreatAndaman_100BP.SG
Since barcin might mask some Natufian. I used Aktopraklik instead and the margion of error is lower than the percentage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie
Attachment 142737