Nope, that stems from Turkish state propaganda. Mehrdad Izady states the names of some Kurdified Turkish tribes, and the Qoçgiri are not amongst them.
Printable View
There are like 10 results here in this thread. Alevi Kurds seem to have have evaluated eurasian if you compare them to Yezidis.
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...-Alevi-results
Are Kurds in Turkey all Turkish-speaking and/or bilingual?
Not sure how reliable this is but I found this. Mostly L and G which makes sense for a neolithic/Caucasian population
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qpDBHPbdh.../ydnatablo.png
Thank you. Difference between West Trabzon and East Trabzon is interesting too. West almost has no haplogroup L.
West:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GLip8G_MP...%2Btrabzon.png
East:
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PoLF5V-Yd...%2Btrabzon.png
Bunalim's father from Trabzon is J2a, I believe.
It depends on individual cases. But for example most of Kurdish villages in the home city of my parents are turkified, but everyone knows who is a kurd or who not.
I don’t want to ignite a discussion so i wont respond to this question anymore. Tribes in Turkey are well researched, regardless of your ethnicity. Claiming here that scientifical research is just propaganda of a state is bullshit and sometimes i cannot respond to this kind of bullshit anymore, honestly discussions aren’t enriching anymore with those kind of backwardness. Not everyone must have the same opinion or thoughts, i know but at some point this cool threads/discussions lose the charm. Turkey is interested in to spot the distribution of all ethnicities and their origin since last years. Reason for that is for example some stupid maps like some members have in their signatures. That is often criticized as partitioning or whatever. Here i must to laud Turkush historians for their great work about that and i say that as someone who often criticizes Turks in this science. I know many are just trolling, i am here as someone who is interested in history and genetics. But that shit becomes boring...