I do love it but in this case I was merely saying a new thread would be better because this one has over 220 pages. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkoV
Printable View
I do love it but in this case I was merely saying a new thread would be better because this one has over 220 pages. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkoV
Reading lots of negative opinions about mytrueancestry here, is there some feature from this site that can actually be considered OK for reference?
Here are some of my results anyways:
Full civilization breakdown:
Attachment 126738
Ancient sample breakdown:
Attachment 126739
Chromosome contribution:
Attachment 126740
Closest ancient populations:
Attachment 126741
P.S. I am also 90% sample match closer than any other users with the Hunyadi Dynasty and share 23 cM DNA with Louis XVI, but reading this topic, I guess I shouldn't believe these stats ;)
I have analyzed four autosomal samples from genetically unrelated individuals originating from Croatia, all indicating White Croats in their ancestry. There may be inaccuracies, but I believe this service is not meant for mockery.
The closest autosomal archaeological results to Louis XVI are from Macedonia, which is a neighboring country to Bulgaria.
Attachment 126744
Results closest to Croatians are from Croatia, without specifying the country of origin during registration.
Attachment 126743CONFIG]126745[/ATTACH]
Too bad there’s some issue with logging into my accounts. I’m wondering if my mother is still in the #3 spot or whatever it was in closeness to Srubnaya on there, lol.
I like My True Ancestry.com :thumb001:
Roman City Viminacium
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...vIMINACIUM.JPG
New Result
1º Mine 2º Father
https://i.postimg.cc/TPr6pSzP/Mediev...rian-PER05.jpg
And this Deep Dive was received by my brother, my father and I did not receive it, so it must have come from some ancestor through the maternal line. I don't know if I've read recently that in that area the nobility took wives from countries in what are now called southern European countries.
https://i.postimg.cc/tqBXW011/Screen...oid-chrome.jpg
N1b itself has three basal branches: N1b1, N1b2, and a third, which we labeled N1b3, represented by a single sample from Anatolia. N1b2 is found mainly in Ashkenazi Jews, and its estimated age of ∼2 ka indicates a recent founder effect among Ashkenazi ancestors. The main subclade, N1b1, dates to ∼13–14 ka ago and includes several branches from the Near East, Europe (rarely; mainly in central and eastern Mediterranean Europe), Arabia, and northern Africa (Figure 2C). HVS-I founder ages in Europe indicate a primarily Neolithic expansion (∼8 ka ago) with the f1criterion but a Late Glacial expansion (∼15 ka ago) with the f2 criterion. This last scenario is perhaps more plausible given the HVS-I network (Figure S3) and suggests that N1b2 evolved within Europe. The predominantly European subclades, which date to ∼10–13 ka ago, indicate that the expansion was indeed most likely pre-Neolithic.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276663/