@Lucas please remove Kyrgyz_Bishkek from Dodecad, it's crap and I don't know who added it. One Kyrgyz would suffice.
Printable View
@Lucas please remove Kyrgyz_Bishkek from Dodecad, it's crap and I don't know who added it. One Kyrgyz would suffice.
most of the current Serb regional averages have way too little samples, less than 10. And they are all very similar to each other, so they can easily overflood one's oracles.
I merged regions that are identical or very similar into these 4 simplified averages:
the approximate geographic distribution of these averages:Code:Serb_north,25.11,30.70,16.57,9.04,14.65,1.53,0.53,0.32,0.57,0.43,0.43,0.06,0.04
Serb_central,25.13,29.35,17.05,8.71,15.72,1.62,0.57,0.26,0.66,0.50,0.28,0.10,0.05
Serb_south,23.36,27.16,17.57,9.33,18.39,1.96,0.44,0.18,0.84,0.35,0.28,0.00,0.15
Montenegrin,24.61,25.37,18.18,10.20,17.36,2.35,0.13,0.25,0.75,0.43,0.27,0.02,0.06
Serb,24.71,29.16,17.05,9.00,16.03,1.69,0.51,0.26,0.67,0.44,0.33,0.07,0.07
https://i.imgur.com/zwZK2xE.png
i think these should replace the current averages, if everybody agrees. but then the averages for other ethnicities should be simplified too.
Excellent idea, I want to do same for Croatian averages but am unable to do so myself.
My idea is as following:
Southern (Dalmatia, Lika, all of BiH)
North and Central (Zagorje, central)
Eastern (Slavonia)
Western (Istria and Primorje, Gorski kotar)
+ one general average
If you wish, you can do them. I posted few results recently in south Slav (Commonsense did too) thread that need to be added as well (from page 46 to the end)
Lukasz, please finish the latest Creoda update :)