It must be connected with gigantic dinaric dudes who are so fucking clanish and nationalistic. I call it proto Ustaša-Četnik-Balija marker and it's totally unique among Slavs, nobody else has big amount of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pribislav
Printable View
It must be connected with gigantic dinaric dudes who are so fucking clanish and nationalistic. I call it proto Ustaša-Četnik-Balija marker and it's totally unique among Slavs, nobody else has big amount of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pribislav
https://mytrueancestry.com/img/SampleMapArch.jpg
Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
1. Central Roman (590 AD) (10.85)
2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (11.46)
3. Central Roman (590 AD) (12.12)
4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (12.67)
5. Central Roman / Mixed (590 AD) (14.52)
6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (15.42)
7. Central Roman (590 AD) (15.59)
8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (16.6)
9. Mycenaean (1350 BC) (16.61)
Check your Archeogenetic matches in the tab Ancient Samples. You'll get an incomplete list but it will show some of your top matches.Quote:
Originally Posted by NielsW
And it's very low in Greece/Bulgaria/Macedonia which is interesting. It really is just a Serb/Croat/Bosniak clade in the vast majority of cases. Saying that, I have a Belarussian match, but he claims his paternal ancestor was a Kosovan Serb horsemen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić
Answer:Quote:
Originally Posted by talombo
Blue dots link to a clearly defined set of ancient peoples. Red dots refer to ancient samples where identity is difficult to determine based on archaelogical evidence.
Faded dots mean distant connection, brighter dots mean very close DNA distance to you.
Epic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
The Avar sample used is Szolad from Hungary. It was a female and similar to belarussiansQuote:
Originally Posted by Bosniensis
Very true. :) :1127:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić
I tried it now, it hasn't changed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey