I think it works in your case, too. The problem is the Greek samples. I don't believe they represent proper Greek genetic as i always said. You may think i stuck with it lol. Anyway, let's investigate it.
Target: Thracian
Distance: 7.2152% / 7.21524088 | ADC: 1x
66.6 Greek_Macedonia_Thrace
17.6 Romanian
14.6 Greek_Peloponnese
1.2 Tadjik
Target: Thracian_I
Distance: 3.6034% / 3.60338105 | ADC: 0.5x
37.2 Romanian
31.8 Greek_Macedonia_Thrace
21.2 Greek_Andros_Island
7.8 Tadjik
2.0 Turkmen_Uzbekistan
These models are spot on. Romanian + Andros will make Macedonia Thrace and the rest is from the Turk part.
The thing which i didn't understand is your Greek admixture in these models and in most of the calculators, how is that possible to score such high while you don't have an ancestor from Greece? Or any town which is not highly populated by Greeks? You were thinking it is about your side which is from Kardzhali. Because they were identifying as "Dağlı"(Mountaineer) as an addition to their Turk identity and this was making them different than the others, i also remember we talked potential Sarakatsani-Dağlı connection in the past.
But after some time thinking about this, i can say that there are one more possible way to explain it. Because Dağlı results don't fit our imagination. See:
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 Baltic 18.37
2 West_Asian 17.42
3 East_Med 17.18
4 North_Atlantic 15.65
5 West_Med 15.33
6 Siberian 7.75
7 Red_Sea 3.97
8 East_Asian 3.47
9 Oceanian 0.47
10 Northeast_African 0.4
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Bulgarian 12.54
2 Greek_Thessaly 13.48
3 Romanian 13.51
4 Central_Greek 16.27
5 Serbian 16.55
6 Italian_Abruzzo 16.7
7 East_Sicilian 17.5
8 West_Sicilian 18.93
9 Moldavian 19.39
10 Tuscan 19.48
11 Ashkenazi 19.54
12 South_Italian 20.08
13 Nogay 20.12
14 North_Italian 21.76
15 Turkish 22.07
16 Tatar 22.94
17 Croatian 23.09
18 Hungarian 23.1
19 Sephardic_Jewish 24.77
20 Kumyk 24.79
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 62.6% Bulgarian + 37.4% Nogay @ 4.5
2 60.9% Greek_Thessaly + 39.1% Nogay @ 4.94
3 69.5% Bulgarian + 30.5% Afghan_Turkmen @ 5.03
4 59.2% Central_Greek + 40.8% Tatar @ 5.16
5 53.5% South_Italian + 46.5% Tatar @ 5.17
6 61% Romanian + 39% Nogay @ 5.38
7 67.9% Greek_Thessaly + 32.1% Afghan_Turkmen @ 5.45
8 57.3% East_Sicilian + 42.7% Tatar @ 5.58
9 72.5% Bulgarian + 27.5% Uzbeki @ 5.82
10 75.8% Bulgarian + 24.2% Hazara @ 5.85
11 67.7% Central_Greek + 32.3% Chuvash @ 5.91
12 55.4% Tatar + 44.6% Cyprian @ 6
13 73.9% Bulgarian + 26.1% Aghan_Hazara @ 6.02
14 62.4% South_Italian + 37.6% Chuvash @ 6.03
15 52.1% Tatar + 47.9% Sephardic_Jewish @ 6.37
16 70.4% Central_Greek + 29.6% Mari @ 6.39
17 68.5% Romanian + 31.5% Afghan_Turkmen @ 6.41
18 58.8% Italian_Abruzzo + 41.2% Tatar @ 6.41
19 71.1% Greek_Thessaly + 28.9% Uzbeki @ 6.44
20 67.3% Italian_Abruzzo + 32.7% Chuvash @ 6.46
This person identifies as Dağlı. If i remember well, their migration date to Turkey is similar to your family and again, if i remember well, you two live in the same city in Turkey. And you two also matched. Despite we thought they had Greek admixture instead of Bulgarian and probably has little Turkic admixture, he has one of the most legit Bulgarian-Oghuz results i have ever seen.
On the other hand, you also have Gevgelija ancestry from Northern Macedonia. I searched languages spoken in this town during the Ottoman Empire and saw that there were primary schools in which their teachers are not assigned by the Ottoman government. But Greek schools already connected to the government, then?
Map is from 1886
https://i.ibb.co/LxJZMzq/vl.jpg
Then i checked the situation in today
https://i.ibb.co/HYQkLM5/vl2.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...len-map-en.png
You may also interested in with it:
You may think 5000 is small. But Macedonia has around 1000, Greece has around 4000 and Romania has around 1000. So this means half of their population converted. The ones who migrated to Turkey known as "Karacaovalılar"
Even if your ancestor is not convert but ethnic Turk, this map is from the 18th century and shows that the native population of the region were Vlachs, they didn't migrate from anywhere to there. So their admixture will be Vlach.
https://i.ibb.co/2YgmGp0/vl3.jpg
Your Kardzhali & Gevgelija side seems legit now and we can see the potential reason for your low East Eurasian and high Greco-Roman(NA) influence here.