This is the best for me so far. I'm going by the percentage result on the left. Could someone let me know? I'm just trying to understand what is a good result in these models.
https://i.postimg.cc/ZKq60Qz1/Screen...-22-165020.png
Printable View
This is the best for me so far. I'm going by the percentage result on the left. Could someone let me know? I'm just trying to understand what is a good result in these models.
https://i.postimg.cc/ZKq60Qz1/Screen...-22-165020.png
High Yamnaya. How feasible is this model?
https://i.postimg.cc/NMnJtzMv/Screen...-23-144018.png
Here are some of my recent results
https://i.postimg.cc/R0QXS3Cs/image.png
https://i.postimg.cc/V6Kgt3CX/image.png
https://i.postimg.cc/kX0cWNBY/image.png
there is still something to improve here
https://i.postimg.cc/0QXGjDTf/image.png
VK202 from Scotland is apparently a local Pictish individual with no Scandinavian ancestry. So, I did some models of myself with him.
Here is how he is labeled in the dataset:
Attachment 142986
Here you all will see a bit of a difference between G25 and qpAdm.
Attachment 142979
Distance to: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
0.02821931 Scotland_Viking:VK202__AD_950__Cov_57.86%
0.18920718 Lebanon_EjJaouze_Phoenician.SG
Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0228% / 0.02275620
91.8 Scotland_Viking
8.2 Lebanon_EjJaouze_Phoenician.SG
Attachment 142980
Distance to: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
0.02821931 Scotland_Viking:VK202__AD_950__Cov_57.86%
0.16307509 Italy_Pompeii_Roman:f1R__AD_79__Cov_33.78%
Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0240% / 0.02397695
91.6 Scotland_Viking
8.4 Italy_Pompeii_Roman
Attachment 142981
Distance to: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
0.02821931 Scotland_Viking:VK202__AD_950__Cov_57.86%
0.11782058 Italy_Basilicata_Venosa
Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0218% / 0.02181276
86.6 Scotland_Viking
13.4 Italy_Basilicata_Venosa
Attachment 142982
Distance to: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
0.02821931 Scotland_Viking:VK202__AD_950__Cov_57.86%
0.25568171 Syria_TellQarassa_Umayyad
Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0232% / 0.02324438
94.1 Scotland_Viking
5.9 Syria_TellQarassa_Umayyad
Attachment 142983
Distance to: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
0.02821931 Scotland_Viking:VK202__AD_950__Cov_57.86%
0.22606617 Egyptian_LateKingdomPeriod_JK2134_JK2911_avg
Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0228% / 0.02284658
93.1 Scotland_Viking
6.9 Egyptian_LateKingdomPeriod_JK2134_JK2911_avg
And then I modeled VK202's Steppe+ANF/EEF+WHG admixture:
Attachment 142984
With the exact same references, I modeled my own Steppe+EEF+WHG admixture:
Attachment 142985
Pre Yamnaya model:
Attachment 143029
I'm having great difficult getting good models for Iron Age and Medieval periods. All my models have a large statistical error.
Attachment 143031
Attachment 143032
Attachment 143033
You can try these ^
With those references I did this model:
Attachment 143034
Attachment 143035
Attachment 143036
Attachment 143037
You can also try this reference list too. It was with this list that I did this model:
Attachment 143038
If you try either of those two lists, you may need to remove or substitute a related population one at a time.
First model didn't work but 2nd one did. :thumb001:
https://i.postimg.cc/DZ7W04Np/Screen...-25-131642.png
https://i.postimg.cc/sxybtsvh/Screen...-25-133037.png
I no doubt have real ancestry from Kilteasheen as my father has long term ancestry from close to where these genomes were buried and is R1b-M222. I just can't find the right model for them.
On MyHeritage Ancient Origins I'm closest to Kilteasheen KIL001.
My No 1 two way fit on Illustrative dna is below.
https://i.postimg.cc/QdT281tp/Screen...-25-160036.png
My No 2 is with the Pict and No 3 with Kilteasheen.
https://i.postimg.cc/HkMkqJ1N/Screen...-25-161530.png